Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... (I think somebody is taking a beginning nav course. Will probably need it if stepping up from the cartop sail board) Two references: From the Dictionary of Nautical Literacy, published by International Marine ( a division of McGraw-Hill) Dead reckoning: The process of determining the position of a vessel by tracking course and speed for a given time. From the phrase, "deduced reckoning", the plot is called a "DR". According to this source, Jax is half right. The process is called "dead reckoning", but the hypothetical plot it produces can be called a "deduced reckoning." Then there's another source that indicates neither side of the argument has an absolute leg to stand on: From "The Sailor's Illustrated Dictionary" dead reckoning (DR): The determining of a position by course, speed, and time elapsed, but without a fix. A DR position is shownon the chart with a half cirlce and a dot and the time the vessel was calculated to be in the position. With any other information included, such as wind and current, it is called an estimated position. The term "dead reckoning" comes from "deduced reckoning" or "ded. reckoning", which later became "dead reckoning." According to this source, the hypotheticaly correct term realy is ded. reckoning, (short for deduced). Unlike an assertion that anybody who knew squat about navigation would never say "dead reckoning", those who are exposed to the practice on an actual basis, in the real world rather than by reading about boating, have probably never heard the technique called anything except "dead reckoning." Thanks for taking your time to share this information. Though I am not a world sailor, this is quite interesting. I never knew there was a difference in terminology regarding dead reckoning. Best regards |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
Thanks for taking your time to share this information. Though I am not a
world sailor, this is quite interesting. I never knew there was a difference in terminology regarding dead reckoning. oh yeah, and there is a HUGE difference in the output between Ded and Dead Reckoning. those who use ded rec are knowledgeable as to its uncertainties, while those who use dead rec are about to now, or will sometime in the future, hit the rocks. Assuming they sail at all. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
JAXAshby wrote:
Thanks for taking your time to share this information. Though I am not a world sailor, this is quite interesting. I never knew there was a difference in terminology regarding dead reckoning. oh yeah, and there is a HUGE difference in the output between Ded and Dead Reckoning. those who use ded rec are knowledgeable as to its uncertainties, while those who use dead rec are about to now, or will sometime in the future, hit the rocks. Assuming they sail at all. Give it up, Jax. You've got a ****ty little clapped out daysailer, and probably couldn't navigate from Milford to Port Jefferson on a bright sunny day with the Port Jeff stacks puffing. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
hoary, the Port Jeff stacks haven't puffed in nearly three decades.
oh yeah, and there is a HUGE difference in the output between Ded and Dead Reckoning. those who use ded rec are knowledgeable as to its uncertainties, while those who use dead rec are about to now, or will sometime in the future, hit the rocks. Assuming they sail at all. Give it up, Jax. You've got a ****ty little clapped out daysailer, and probably couldn't navigate from Milford to Port Jefferson on a bright sunny day with the Port Jeff stacks puffing. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
"JAXAshby" wrote in message ... Thanks for taking your time to share this information. Though I am not a world sailor, this is quite interesting. I never knew there was a difference in terminology regarding dead reckoning. oh yeah, and there is a HUGE difference in the output between Ded and Dead Reckoning. those who use ded rec are knowledgeable as to its uncertainties, while those who use dead rec are about to now, or will sometime in the future, hit the rocks. Assuming they sail at all. As I said, I am not a world sailor. I rely on GPS and an accurate compass to take me home. But then again, I am not more than 25 miles or so off shore. However, I have heard the term used and assumed wrongly that it meant exact knowledge of position. My hobby happens to be history and the old letters and books I have read refer to dead reckoning of a position or course. This thread is quite enlightening giving me a better understanding of the intended words. Thanks to all |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
As I said, I am not a world sailor. I rely on GPS and an accurate compass to
take me home. enjoy, john. and don't worry about it, for in today's world there is no reason not to have a gps or two onboard if there is any remote chance of needing it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
"JAXAshby" wrote in message The following of some of the definitions of the word "dead" and each shows why the word is not used in the context of the guestimated, vague navigation called Ded(uced) Reckoning: Both dead reckoning and ded reckoning are considered acceptable in common daily usage, jax. I might also point out that the method in question is not nearly so guestimated and vague as you state. Successful DR navigation depends largely on 1) accurate and detailed planning; 2) careful and accurate boat handling; and is also affected by 3) unanticipated factors, which can be ameliorated to some extent by (1). |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
Both dead reckoning and ded reckoning are considered acceptable in common
daily usage, jax. lots of things are in common usage, but that make the usage correct in its statement that "dead" reckoning is accurate. it is not. it IS "deduced" reckoning, and with all that that implies. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
JAXAshby wrote:
Both dead reckoning and ded reckoning are considered acceptable in common daily usage, jax. lots of things are in common usage... But your brain is not among these things, Jax. Perhaps you should just be satisifed with your lot in life...a rejected Speedo bathing suit model wannabe. BTW, how's that crappy little 26' sailboat of yours...did it sink at the dock...again? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
Subject: Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced
navigation From: (JAXAshby) Date: 07/20/2004 06:26 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Both dead reckoning and ded reckoning are considered acceptable in common daily usage, jax. lots of things are in common usage, but that make the usage correct in its statement that "dead" reckoning is accurate. it is not. it IS "deduced" reckoning, and with all that that implies. One question. How many times have you been the person in charge of navigation on anything but a day trip on LI Sound never out of sight of land? Shen |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bush Exploits Photo of Dead Bodies | General |