| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced navigation
ubject: Why the word "dead" is not used in the context of deduced
navigation From: (JAXAshby) Date: 08/07/2004 10:57 Pacific Standard Time Message-id: Never "wondered" around a rocky channel with compass and "knotmeter" in fog. However, used to frequently run a winding channel in fog with a compass, tach, and watch, with no problems .... does that count? Shen only in the stew ped department, shen. only in the stew ped dept. you dumb squat, you have no idea how lucky you were. like the drunk driver who made it home through traffic. Only an idiot would discount luck, totally, but there's a difference between relying on luck alone and using ALL the information available to get the job done. Since you are a product of GPS, I would not expect you to understand how this could be done regularly with less danger than allowing YOU to run the same channel WITH a GPS on a clear day. Shen |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Bush Exploits Photo of Dead Bodies | General | |||
Threaded Mode
