| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
OT Bush losing Republican voters
This pretty much tells the story:
Bush loses a lifelong Republican Joan Ryan Thursday, July 8, 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My parents, like all parents who grew up in New York, live in Florida. They have voted down-the-line Republican in every election since they came of age. Despite their shared Catholicism, they couldn't stand John or Bobby Kennedy. Don't even talk to them about Ted. They still believe Nixon got a raw deal. Needless to say, they supported the Bush brothers in their respective elections, George for president and Jeb for governor. But a funny thing has happened on the way to the 2004 election. George Bush is managing to do what no politician has done before him -- drive my mother and father and others like them from their well-worn seats on the GOP bus. "I can't vote for him,'' my father said as we sat in the Florida room of their adult-community condo. I nearly dropped the bottle of beer I had pressed to my forehead. ("What, you're hot?'' my mother had asked. The air conditioning was indeed on, as she assured me it was, set to a frosty 80 degrees.) "He completely underestimated how the Iraqis would respond,'' my father said. We generally avoid politics when I visit. I'm from the gay-marrying, war- protesting, Michael Moore-loving republic of the San Francisco Bay Area. We tend to limit our current-events discussions to the Giants' chances in the National League West. "They thought all these people were going to jump up and praise them,'' my father said. "There have been too many mistakes. We're supposed to have control over there, and our boys keep getting killed. It's a mishmash. The whole thing is a mishmash. He's backed himself into a corner by trying to liberate a country, and the people don't want you to be liberating them.'' His anger is about more than a difference of opinion with the president about how and why he waged this particular war. There is a corrosive quality to this presidency that has eaten away at what my father believes his country stands for. Anecdotal evidence suggests he is not alone. Republican leaders, however, will tell you the faithful aren't wavering. As evidence, they point to a bipartisan poll conducted for National Public Radio in May that found just 6 percent of Republicans say they plan to vote for Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry. But the poll means little. It asked the wrong question. My father would also have told them he doesn't plan to vote for Kerry. He'd cut off his finger before using it to cast a vote for a limousine liberal like Kerry. But his dislike for Kerry does not diminish his disillusionment with Bush. He won't vote for either of them, he says, leaving the top lines of his ballot blank for the first time in his life. "Maybe I'll write in your mother's name,'' he said. America's bloody entry into Iraq, with the torture and beheadings and charred bodies and gushing torrents of taxpayer money, is prompting a nation to take stock of who it is and what it believes in. I want to think that the war is diluting the blues and reds on the national political maps, that people are sloughing off their color-coded cloaks as Republicans and Democrats, conservatives and liberals, and recognizing the common ideals that bind us as Americans. Those ideals -- among them, compassion, freedom, diplomacy, liberty, rule of law -- have been battered by a president who still can't produce a compelling reason to have sent our men and women into battle against a country that never attacked us. He tosses aside civil liberties as if they were Kleenex, denies basic due process even to American citizens -- a conceit the Supreme Court recently judged unacceptable -- and believes the Geneva Conventions apply only when he says they do. My father has always enjoyed quoting the late Al Capp, the creator of the comic strip "Li'l Abner,'' who defended his conservatism in the 1960s by saying that he was and always had been a moderate. He only seemed conservative, he said, because the rest of the country had shifted to the left. There was a code of living in Capp's world, and in my father's. They believed in consistency bordering on stasis, even if it meant becoming a walking anachronism in your own lifetime. My father and others like him who have always been more or less middle-of- the-road Republicans now feel out of step with this Republican president. It is not because their own ideals have shifted but because their president's have. "It's terrible that in this country of so many good people,'' my father said, "how an election can come down to the lesser of two evils. You have to vote this time for who will do the least harm. Not the most good, but the least harm.'' Sometimes we settle for a president who isn't inspiring or visionary or all that brilliant. But we should never settle for one who diminishes America by flouting its core ideals. The election is four months away. My father could change his mind and, in the end, vote for Bush. But I'm hoping my mother's name shows up on at least one ballot in Palm Beach County. |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
"basskisser" wrote in message m... Palm Beach County. He'd probably punch the wrong chad anyhow. |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
In article , atl_man2
@yahoo.com says... "I can't vote for him,'' my father said as we sat in the Florida room of their adult-community condo. Same reaction I got from a Kansas City based gentleman who, I believe, always goes for the Republican side of the ballot. I asked him if he'd vote for Kerry and he said "oh, no. I'll just stay home." jps |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
"jps" wrote in message ... In article , atl_man2 @yahoo.com says... "I can't vote for him,'' my father said as we sat in the Florida room of their adult-community condo. Same reaction I got from a Kansas City based gentleman who, I believe, always goes for the Republican side of the ballot. I asked him if he'd vote for Kerry and he said "oh, no. I'll just stay home." jps Makes me wonder how Mario Cuomo would do right about now....... |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
My mother was a life long Republican. She was a school teacher. She
resisted unionization of her job in the early 1970's (despite making the same salary for 4 years)... Dad was a W.W.II vet. Captured by the Nazi's in Holland. Spent several months in a POW camp in Poland, Stalag IIb (a very large, violent, old camp full of some 15,000 Russians and Poles). Was liberated by the Red Army in April of 1945. Was reunited with his original unit in Hanover, Germany, ironically the same town his paternal grandparents had come from 50 years prior... They couldn't vote for Truman. They liked Ike. My maternal grandmother spent many hours volunteering for Ike. They had no use for Kennedy or Johnson. They mildly supported Nixon and Ford/Dole when they lost to Carter. They mildly supported Reagan/Bush in 1980. They seemed neutral in 1984. In 1988 they supported Dukakis mildly. What? What they hell happened? I'm not exactly sure...Dad died in 1990. In 1992 mom was a volunteer and activist for Clinton/Gore. In 1996, she stopped volunteering, due to health issues. She cut a nice check instead. Same in 2000. In 2004, despite a very frail body, mom is VERY active in supporting Kerry. Why? The realization that they had spent a lifetime supporting a corrupt and evil group of elitists who had moved their party further and further to the right. Mom is volunteering now because my older sister has a 17 year old son and simply put, mom doesn't want to see him become cannon fodder for BushCo's sensless war. That and all the other crap he's pulled... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... In article , atl_man2 says... "I can't vote for him,'' my father said as we sat in the Florida room of their adult-community condo. Same reaction I got from a Kansas City based gentleman who, I believe, always goes for the Republican side of the ballot. I asked him if he'd vote for Kerry and he said "oh, no. I'll just stay home." jps Makes me wonder how Mario Cuomo would do right about now....... |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
"NOYB" wrote in message link.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message m... Palm Beach County. He'd probably punch the wrong chad anyhow. So, in your ignorant world, because a person lives in a certain county, they are more likely to punch the wrong chad? Man, you are stupid. |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
Sailing Fan wrote in message ...
My mother was a life long Republican. She was a school teacher. She resisted unionization of her job in the early 1970's (despite making the same salary for 4 years)... Dad was a W.W.II vet. Captured by the Nazi's in Holland. Spent several months in a POW camp in Poland, Stalag IIb (a very large, violent, old camp full of some 15,000 Russians and Poles). Was liberated by the Red Army in April of 1945. Was reunited with his original unit in Hanover, Germany, ironically the same town his paternal grandparents had come from 50 years prior... They couldn't vote for Truman. They liked Ike. My maternal grandmother spent many hours volunteering for Ike. They had no use for Kennedy or Johnson. They mildly supported Nixon and Ford/Dole when they lost to Carter. They mildly supported Reagan/Bush in 1980. They seemed neutral in 1984. In 1988 they supported Dukakis mildly. What? What they hell happened? I'm not exactly sure...Dad died in 1990. In 1992 mom was a volunteer and activist for Clinton/Gore. In 1996, she stopped volunteering, due to health issues. She cut a nice check instead. Same in 2000. In 2004, despite a very frail body, mom is VERY active in supporting Kerry. Why? The realization that they had spent a lifetime supporting a corrupt and evil group of elitists who had moved their party further and further to the right. Mom is volunteering now because my older sister has a 17 year old son and simply put, mom doesn't want to see him become cannon fodder for BushCo's sensless war. That and all the other crap he's pulled... You should be proud of your parents. Unlike the blinded right wingers that frequent here, they are intelligent enough to realize what The Republican party has become, and are trying to change things. |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 03:58:25 GMT, Sailing Fan wrote:
My mother was a life long Republican. She was a school teacher. She resisted unionization of her job in the early 1970's (despite making the same salary for 4 years)... Dad was a W.W.II vet. Captured by the Nazi's in Holland. Spent several months in a POW camp in Poland, Stalag IIb (a very large, violent, old camp full of some 15,000 Russians and Poles). Was liberated by the Red Army in April of 1945. Was reunited with his original unit in Hanover, Germany, ironically the same town his paternal grandparents had come from 50 years prior... They couldn't vote for Truman. They liked Ike. My maternal grandmother spent many hours volunteering for Ike. They had no use for Kennedy or Johnson. They mildly supported Nixon and Ford/Dole when they lost to Carter. They mildly supported Reagan/Bush in 1980. They seemed neutral in 1984. In 1988 they supported Dukakis mildly. What? What they hell happened? I'm not exactly sure...Dad died in 1990. In 1992 mom was a volunteer and activist for Clinton/Gore. In 1996, she stopped volunteering, due to health issues. She cut a nice check instead. Same in 2000. In 2004, despite a very frail body, mom is VERY active in supporting Kerry. Why? The realization that they had spent a lifetime supporting a corrupt and evil group of elitists who had moved their party further and further to the right. Perhaps it's easier than that. She's now collecting on the government dole, and wants those in power who favor the continuation of those types of programs. She won't have to worry about increases in income tax, or the greater burdens that government sponsored healthcare will place on currently working people. Dave |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Sailing Fan wrote: My mother was a life long Republican. She was a school teacher. She resisted unionization of her job in the early 1970's (despite making the same salary for 4 years)... Dad was a W.W.II vet. Captured by the Nazi's in Holland. Spent several months in a POW camp in Poland, Stalag IIb (a very large, violent, old camp full of some 15,000 Russians and Poles). Was liberated by the Red Army in April of 1945. Was reunited with his original unit in Hanover, Germany, ironically the same town his paternal grandparents had come from 50 years prior... They couldn't vote for Truman. They liked Ike. My maternal grandmother spent many hours volunteering for Ike. They had no use for Kennedy or Johnson. They mildly supported Nixon and Ford/Dole when they lost to Carter. They mildly supported Reagan/Bush in 1980. They seemed neutral in 1984. In 1988 they supported Dukakis mildly. What? What they hell happened? I'm not exactly sure...Dad died in 1990. In 1992 mom was a volunteer and activist for Clinton/Gore. In 1996, she stopped volunteering, due to health issues. She cut a nice check instead. Same in 2000. In 2004, despite a very frail body, mom is VERY active in supporting Kerry. Why? The realization that they had spent a lifetime supporting a corrupt and evil group of elitists who had moved their party further and further to the right. Mom is volunteering now because my older sister has a 17 year old son and simply put, mom doesn't want to see him become cannon fodder for BushCo's sensless war. That and all the other crap he's pulled... My Republican father-in-law is so disgusted with bush and Cheney, he won't discuss politics, and politics is one of his favorite subjects. I'm sure he won't vote for Kerry; my feeling is that he is going to sit out this election. My father won't discuss the current candidates, which is a far cry from 4 years ago when he thought Bush was way cool. All he'll say is he thinks that all else being equal, it might not be a bad idea to elect someone who's so wealthy that he's untouchable. |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 03:58:25 GMT, Sailing Fan wrote: My mother was a life long Republican. She was a school teacher. She resisted unionization of her job in the early 1970's (despite making the same salary for 4 years)... Dad was a W.W.II vet. Captured by the Nazi's in Holland. Spent several months in a POW camp in Poland, Stalag IIb (a very large, violent, old camp full of some 15,000 Russians and Poles). Was liberated by the Red Army in April of 1945. Was reunited with his original unit in Hanover, Germany, ironically the same town his paternal grandparents had come from 50 years prior... They couldn't vote for Truman. They liked Ike. My maternal grandmother spent many hours volunteering for Ike. They had no use for Kennedy or Johnson. They mildly supported Nixon and Ford/Dole when they lost to Carter. They mildly supported Reagan/Bush in 1980. They seemed neutral in 1984. In 1988 they supported Dukakis mildly. What? What they hell happened? I'm not exactly sure...Dad died in 1990. In 1992 mom was a volunteer and activist for Clinton/Gore. In 1996, she stopped volunteering, due to health issues. She cut a nice check instead. Same in 2000. In 2004, despite a very frail body, mom is VERY active in supporting Kerry. Why? The realization that they had spent a lifetime supporting a corrupt and evil group of elitists who had moved their party further and further to the right. Perhaps it's easier than that. She's now collecting on the government dole, and wants those in power who favor the continuation of those types of programs. She won't have to worry about increases in income tax, or the greater burdens that government sponsored healthcare will place on currently working people. Dave What an intensely stupid thing to say. |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
Perhaps it's easier than that. She's now collecting on the government
dole, and wants those in power who favor the continuation of those types of programs. She won't have to worry about increases in income tax, or the greater burdens that government sponsored healthcare will place on currently working people. Dave What an intensely stupid thing to say. Some people cannot visualize anybody ever doing or believing anything without a selfish ulterior motive. I won't go in to why that is so often true, but the answer becomes obvious with only a moment's deliberation. |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "basskisser" wrote in message m... Palm Beach County. He'd probably punch the wrong chad anyhow. So, in your ignorant world, because a person lives in a certain county, they are more likely to punch the wrong chad? Man, you are stupid. No, the people living in that county are stupid. |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 15:31:49 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: Perhaps it's easier than that. She's now collecting on the government dole, and wants those in power who favor the continuation of those types of programs. She won't have to worry about increases in income tax, or the greater burdens that government sponsored healthcare will place on currently working people. Dave What an intensely stupid thing to say. Are you suggesting that this is not a possible scenario? I personally KNOW people who changed their stripes when they went from payer to collector of government services. Wake up and breath in a dose of reality. Dave |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
|
OT Bush losing Republican voters
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 15:31:49 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: Perhaps it's easier than that. She's now collecting on the government dole, and wants those in power who favor the continuation of those types of programs. She won't have to worry about increases in income tax, or the greater burdens that government sponsored healthcare will place on currently working people. Dave What an intensely stupid thing to say. Are you suggesting that this is not a possible scenario? I personally KNOW people who changed their stripes when they went from payer to collector of government services. Wake up and breath in a dose of reality. Dave The vast majority of old folks receive some sort of government assistance. You assume granny is wealthy and taking society's money anyway. |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 19:05:32 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 09 Jul 2004 15:31:49 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: Perhaps it's easier than that. She's now collecting on the government dole, and wants those in power who favor the continuation of those types of programs. She won't have to worry about increases in income tax, or the greater burdens that government sponsored healthcare will place on currently working people. Dave What an intensely stupid thing to say. Are you suggesting that this is not a possible scenario? I personally KNOW people who changed their stripes when they went from payer to collector of government services. Wake up and breath in a dose of reality. Dave The vast majority of old folks receive some sort of government assistance. You assume granny is wealthy and taking society's money anyway. I assume nothing. All I know is that I've known people who for years that while they were working, have complained about the government taking money from them to pay out to "the needy". Now that they are on the receiving end of S.S. or other government benefits, they tend to loose their righteous indignation toward the role of public assistance. Considering the nature of human behavior it's not hard to understand how people change their viewpoints when the shoe is on the other foot. Dave |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
"NOYB" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "basskisser" wrote in message m... Palm Beach County. He'd probably punch the wrong chad anyhow. So, in your ignorant world, because a person lives in a certain county, they are more likely to punch the wrong chad? Man, you are stupid. No, the people living in that county are stupid. Ah, yes, your narrow mindedness shows through yet once again... |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
Charles wrote in message ...
Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know. |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know. Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him. -- Charlie |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know. Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him. -- Charlie Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have more than one father in law? YOU said it... |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know. Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him. -- Charlie Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have more than one father in law? YOU said it... You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed. Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
Choice "E"...all of the above.
"Charles" wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know. Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him. -- Charlie Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have more than one father in law? YOU said it... You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed. Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
I wonder if he is now feeling foolish or if he is going to start a diatribe
to "prove" himself correct (i.e. whiskey and Gore-Tex) "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... Choice "E"...all of the above. "Charles" wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know. Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him. -- Charlie Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have more than one father in law? YOU said it... You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed. Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
"Charles" wrote in message ... Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie ** Not so fast Charlie...what if the mormon married two, three or four sisters. How many fathers-in-law then? |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
Charles wrote:
A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 The correct answer is: E) A mormon can't be married to 9 women and still remain a mormon. Shawn. |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know. Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him. -- Charlie Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have more than one father in law? YOU said it... You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed. Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie You stupid buffoon!! I STATED that bigamy is illegal in the United States. Are you stating that Harry is, indeed a bigamist, or are you just dumb? |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net...
Choice "E"...all of the above. A little common sense would serve you well, NOYB. You DO realize that bigamy is illegal in the United States, don't you? You do realize that I stated originally, that bigamy is illegal in the United States, don't you? You do realize that you are now accusing someone of being a bigamist, don't you? |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
"John Smith" wrote in message news:ZlZIc.69581$MB3.38576@attbi_s04...
I wonder if he is now feeling foolish or if he is going to start a diatribe to "prove" himself correct (i.e. whiskey and Gore-Tex) I proved both of those, AND this one. Are you accusing Harry of being a bigamist? Do you realize that I STATED, from the beginning, that I bigamy is illegal in the United States? You see, stupid person, that because I stated such, I KNEW you people would try to accuse someone of something that is simply not true to try to make an idiotic case. |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
Shawn Willden wrote: Charles wrote: A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 The correct answer is: E) A mormon can't be married to 9 women and still remain a mormon. Shawn. Fact is, Shawn, all denials aside, mormon polygamy exists. But I understand the need to put the good public face on it. -- Charlie |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know. Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him. -- Charlie Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have more than one father in law? YOU said it... You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed. Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie You stupid buffoon!! I STATED that bigamy is illegal in the United States. I thought you might try to extricate yourself from your stupid mistake using this equally stupid argument. Know how I knew that? Because stupid is as stupid does. Are you stating that Harry is, indeed a bigamist, or are you just dumb? Your punctuation in the above sentence is a bit dubious, but I think I understand what you are trying to stammer out. Calm down. Take a deep breath. You made another whopper mistake but we do not expect otherwise from you, and it's not really possible for anyone to think less of you than they already do. To answer your question, in a certain sense, krause is, indeed, a big-a-mist, because he's always trying to cloud issues with his personal vitriol against any who dare to disagree with him. You, on the other hand, have long been lost in a big-a-mist of marijuana smoke and I do not expect you to emerge from it anytime soon. (How are those marijuana plants doing?) Speaking of dumb, I do have some good news for you! We have found your long lost brother, the AWOL one, JAXAshby. We found him checking spark plugs on diesel powered fishing trawlers in his skivvies. Well, mama always said life is like a box of chocolates, never know what you're gonna get, but you two seem to have eaten of the same brownie... -- Charlie |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
Don White wrote: "Charles" wrote in message ... Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie ** Not so fast Charlie...what if the mormon married two, three or four sisters. How many fathers-in-law then? I thought the answer would be obvious to you Don, but I'll slow down for you. If the the sisters were all step-sisters, and not all legally adopted by one man, then the answer would be 2, 3, or 4. -- Charlie |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know. Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him. -- Charlie Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have more than one father in law? YOU said it... You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed. Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie You stupid buffoon!! I STATED that bigamy is illegal in the United States. I thought you might try to extricate yourself from your stupid mistake using this equally stupid argument. Know how I knew that? Because stupid is as stupid does. Are you stating that Harry is, indeed a bigamist, or are you just dumb? Your punctuation in the above sentence is a bit dubious, but I think I understand what you are trying to stammer out. Calm down. Take a deep breath. You made another whopper mistake but we do not expect otherwise from you, and it's not really possible for anyone to think less of you than they already do. To answer your question, in a certain sense, krause is, indeed, a big-a-mist, because he's always trying to cloud issues with his personal vitriol against any who dare to disagree with him. You, on the other hand, have long been lost in a big-a-mist of marijuana smoke and I do not expect you to emerge from it anytime soon. (How are those marijuana plants doing?) You said "bigamist". That is a person who is married more than once, at the same time. What to HELL does that have to do with the above blather? Speaking of dumb, I do have some good news for you! We have found your long lost brother, the AWOL one, JAXAshby. We found him checking spark plugs on diesel powered fishing trawlers in his skivvies. Well, mama always said life is like a box of chocolates, never know what you're gonna get, but you two seem to have eaten of the same brownie... -- Charlie God, you are stupid. |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
"basskisser" wrote in message m... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Choice "E"...all of the above. A little common sense would serve you well, NOYB. You DO realize that bigamy is illegal in the United States, don't you? You do realize that I stated originally, that bigamy is illegal in the United States, don't you? You do realize that you are now accusing someone of being a bigamist, don't you? I accused you of being stupid, not a bigamist. If you *were* a bigamist--and I never claimed that you were--then you'd be a stupid bigamist. Since you claim not to be a bigamist, then you're just plain ol' stupid. |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know. Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him. -- Charlie Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have more than one father in law? YOU said it... You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed. Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie You stupid buffoon!! I STATED that bigamy is illegal in the United States. I thought you might try to extricate yourself from your stupid mistake using this equally stupid argument. Know how I knew that? Because stupid is as stupid does. Are you stating that Harry is, indeed a bigamist, or are you just dumb? Your punctuation in the above sentence is a bit dubious, but I think I understand what you are trying to stammer out. Calm down. Take a deep breath. You made another whopper mistake but we do not expect otherwise from you, and it's not really possible for anyone to think less of you than they already do. To answer your question, in a certain sense, krause is, indeed, a big-a-mist, because he's always trying to cloud issues with his personal vitriol against any who dare to disagree with him. You, on the other hand, have long been lost in a big-a-mist of marijuana smoke and I do not expect you to emerge from it anytime soon. (How are those marijuana plants doing?) You said "bigamist". No, I never said bigamist, you said bigamist. I said 'big-a-mist'. Take that knot out of the thing you call your brain, dunce. That is a person who is married more than once, at the same time. What to HELL does that have to do with the above blather? Now I'm confused. Are you saying that krause is a bigamist or a big-a-mist? Speaking of dumb, I do have some good news for you! We have found your long lost brother, the AWOL one, JAXAshby. We found him checking spark plugs on diesel powered fishing trawlers in his skivvies. Well, mama always said life is like a box of chocolates, never know what you're gonna get, but you two seem to have eaten of the same brownie... -- Charlie God, you are stupid. Just because you're stupid, it doesn't mean God is stupid. -- Charlie |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know. Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him. -- Charlie Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have more than one father in law? YOU said it... You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed. Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie You stupid buffoon!! I STATED that bigamy is illegal in the United States. I thought you might try to extricate yourself from your stupid mistake using this equally stupid argument. Know how I knew that? Because stupid is as stupid does. Are you stating that Harry is, indeed a bigamist, or are you just dumb? Your punctuation in the above sentence is a bit dubious, but I think I understand what you are trying to stammer out. Calm down. Take a deep breath. You made another whopper mistake but we do not expect otherwise from you, and it's not really possible for anyone to think less of you than they already do. To answer your question, in a certain sense, krause is, indeed, a big-a-mist, because he's always trying to cloud issues with his personal vitriol against any who dare to disagree with him. You, on the other hand, have long been lost in a big-a-mist of marijuana smoke and I do not expect you to emerge from it anytime soon. (How are those marijuana plants doing?) You said "bigamist". No, I never said bigamist, you said bigamist. I said 'big-a-mist'. Take that knot out of the thing you call your brain, dunce. That is a person who is married more than once, at the same time. What to HELL does that have to do with the above blather? Now I'm confused. Are you saying that krause is a bigamist or a big-a-mist? If you are confused, then you are dumber than I thought, because it was YOU who called Harry both a bigamist, and a big-a-mist. Speaking of dumb, I do have some good news for you! We have found your long lost brother, the AWOL one, JAXAshby. We found him checking spark plugs on diesel powered fishing trawlers in his skivvies. Well, mama always said life is like a box of chocolates, never know what you're gonna get, but you two seem to have eaten of the same brownie... -- Charlie God, you are stupid. Just because you're stupid, it doesn't mean God is stupid. -- Charlie Again, let's get back to your original point, shall we? How can Harry have more than one father in law? Bigamy is illegal in the United States. Are you saying that he is commiting a crime? |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
basskisser wrote: If you are confused, then you are dumber than I thought, because it was YOU who called Harry both a bigamist, and a big-a-mist. Please quote where I said krause was a bigamist. Of course you can't. You jumped to a conclusion about something I wrote and have been running with it ever since as if that is what I meant. Your conclusion is wrong, however, carry on. Maybe your daddy warbucks will come to your defence again. Again, let's get back to your original point, shall we? The only point here is the one on the top of your head. Time to quit smoking the weed there, boy. -- Charlie |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote: If you are confused, then you are dumber than I thought, because it was YOU who called Harry both a bigamist, and a big-a-mist. Please quote where I said krause was a bigamist. Of course you can't. You jumped to a conclusion about something I wrote and have been running with it ever since as if that is what I meant. Your conclusion is wrong, however, carry on. Maybe your daddy warbucks will come to your defence again. Again, let's get back to your original point, shall we? The only point here is the one on the top of your head. Time to quit smoking the weed there, boy. -- Charlie Please show any evidence you have that I have, or do smoke weed. Do you have any? |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: If you are confused, then you are dumber than I thought, because it was YOU who called Harry both a bigamist, and a big-a-mist. Please quote where I said krause was a bigamist. Of course you can't. You jumped to a conclusion about something I wrote and have been running with it ever since as if that is what I meant. Your conclusion is wrong, however, carry on. Maybe your daddy warbucks will come to your defence again. Again, let's get back to your original point, shall we? The only point here is the one on the top of your head. Time to quit smoking the weed there, boy. -- Charlie Please show any evidence you have that I have, or do smoke weed. You demonstrate the effect of it daily. Do you have any? Pot? Nope. Why, do you need more? -- Charlie |
OT Bush losing Republican voters
Charles wrote in message ...
basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: If you are confused, then you are dumber than I thought, because it was YOU who called Harry both a bigamist, and a big-a-mist. Please quote where I said krause was a bigamist. Of course you can't. You jumped to a conclusion about something I wrote and have been running with it ever since as if that is what I meant. Your conclusion is wrong, however, carry on. Maybe your daddy warbucks will come to your defence again. Again, let's get back to your original point, shall we? The only point here is the one on the top of your head. Time to quit smoking the weed there, boy. -- Charlie Please show any evidence you have that I have, or do smoke weed. You demonstrate the effect of it daily. Do you have any? Pot? Nope. Why, do you need more? -- Charlie Ah, I see that, because you can't put any fact with your wild, unfounded allegations, that you've stooped even lower by snipping my words. Quit being such a baby. That's a little kid's trick. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:25 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com