| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know. Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him. -- Charlie Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have more than one father in law? YOU said it... You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed. Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Choice "E"...all of the above.
"Charles" wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know. Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him. -- Charlie Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have more than one father in law? YOU said it... You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed. Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wonder if he is now feeling foolish or if he is going to start a diatribe
to "prove" himself correct (i.e. whiskey and Gore-Tex) "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... Choice "E"...all of the above. "Charles" wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... basskisser wrote: Charles wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: My Republican father-in-law Which one? -- Charlie Are you really that stupid? You can only have one father-in-law legally in the United States. Bigamy is against the law you know. Each and every day your stupidity reaches a new high. That's our b'asskisser, yes sir, that's him. -- Charlie Well, then, Charlie, please....explain to the group how you can have more than one father in law? YOU said it... You are indeed a dolt. I don't need to explain it to the NG, they already know. I need to explain it to you because your stupidity is unsurpassed. Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John Smith" wrote in message news:ZlZIc.69581$MB3.38576@attbi_s04...
I wonder if he is now feeling foolish or if he is going to start a diatribe to "prove" himself correct (i.e. whiskey and Gore-Tex) I proved both of those, AND this one. Are you accusing Harry of being a bigamist? Do you realize that I STATED, from the beginning, that I bigamy is illegal in the United States? You see, stupid person, that because I stated such, I KNEW you people would try to accuse someone of something that is simply not true to try to make an idiotic case. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net...
Choice "E"...all of the above. A little common sense would serve you well, NOYB. You DO realize that bigamy is illegal in the United States, don't you? You do realize that I stated originally, that bigamy is illegal in the United States, don't you? You do realize that you are now accusing someone of being a bigamist, don't you? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"basskisser" wrote in message m... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Choice "E"...all of the above. A little common sense would serve you well, NOYB. You DO realize that bigamy is illegal in the United States, don't you? You do realize that I stated originally, that bigamy is illegal in the United States, don't you? You do realize that you are now accusing someone of being a bigamist, don't you? I accused you of being stupid, not a bigamist. If you *were* a bigamist--and I never claimed that you were--then you'd be a stupid bigamist. Since you claim not to be a bigamist, then you're just plain ol' stupid. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Charles" wrote in message ... Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie ** Not so fast Charlie...what if the mormon married two, three or four sisters. How many fathers-in-law then? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don White wrote: "Charles" wrote in message ... Ready? A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 -- Charlie ** Not so fast Charlie...what if the mormon married two, three or four sisters. How many fathers-in-law then? I thought the answer would be obvious to you Don, but I'll slow down for you. If the the sisters were all step-sisters, and not all legally adopted by one man, then the answer would be 2, 3, or 4. -- Charlie |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Charles wrote:
A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 The correct answer is: E) A mormon can't be married to 9 women and still remain a mormon. Shawn. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Shawn Willden wrote: Charles wrote: A mormon married to 9 women. Multiple choice extra credit for dummies: How many father-in-laws does that man have? A) 9 B) 9 C) 9 D) 9 The correct answer is: E) A mormon can't be married to 9 women and still remain a mormon. Shawn. Fact is, Shawn, all denials aside, mormon polygamy exists. But I understand the need to put the good public face on it. -- Charlie |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Harry reveals his true colors! | General | |||
| OT - FLIP-FLOPPING MAY HAVE INJURED KERRY’S SHOULDER | General | |||
| A lump of coal for Bush | General | |||
| OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. | General | |||