"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H wrote:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:34:47 -0400, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:
Any conservative who *was* a liberal *is* a neoconservative. Why is
Webster not
sufficient as a source any longer?

So, if this definition is correct, then Bush & Cheney not to mention
Wolfowitz etc etc all *used* to be liberals?

Interesting. When was this, exactly?

DSK

Doug, I didn't make up the definition. Go he



http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionar...ve&x=10 &y=13

I have no reason to think the dictionary got it wrong. If Bush, et
al,
are
neoconservatives, then, by definition, they were former liberals who
are
now
espousing political conservatism.

If they are not former liberals, then they are not neoconservatives,
by
definition.


John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!


What you are is an intellectually lazy, simple-minded fool.


Attacking the messenger again rather than supporting, with facts, your
arguments.



Go pee up a rope, Poop.

I see the ghost writer is off duty.