| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Dave Hall wrote: On 23 Jun 2004 15:22:13 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote: It was even simpler than that. I just applied a chain of simple logic based on the definitions previously provided. If "neo" is new, then if someone is a "neo"conservative, that implies that they were previously something else. The most common "other" ideology would be a liberal. Therefore, a "new" conservative would most likely be an "old" liberal. Binary thinking at its finest. Only two possibilities to consider. Sometimes that's all there is. Are you familiar with Occam's razor? Dave I am. Old William called for a minimum number of points *necessary*. For issues as complex as a worldwide Islamist insurgency, black or white ain't enough. Sure it is. If you are an infidel you must convert to Islam or die by the Islamic sword. Simple, black and white and binary. |
Threaded Mode
