Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
There are many links between Terrorists and Saddamn, so ES&D
http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...nion&4&wvx-300 Bob Kerrey, a former Democratic senator from Nebraska and now a member of the commission, said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America" he believes Clinton should have been more aggressive in going after al-Qaeda following the ship attack. "I think he did have enough proof to take action," Kerrey said. "That's a difference of opinion." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
mono sect wrote:
There are many links between Terrorists and Saddamn, so ES&D http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...nion&4&wvx-300 Bob Kerrey, a former Democratic senator from Nebraska and now a member of the commission, said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America" he believes Clinton should have been more aggressive in going after al-Qaeda following the ship attack. "I think he did have enough proof to take action," Kerrey said. "That's a difference of opinion." Bill O'Reilly? Nothing more than another Limbaugh-type entertainer. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... mono sect wrote: There are many links between Terrorists and Saddamn, so ES&D http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...nion&4&wvx-300 Bob Kerrey, a former Democratic senator from Nebraska and now a member of the commission, said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America" he believes Clinton should have been more aggressive in going after al-Qaeda following the ship attack. "I think he did have enough proof to take action," Kerrey said. "That's a difference of opinion." Bill O'Reilly? Nothing more than another Limbaugh-type entertainer. So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
jim-- wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... mono sect wrote: There are many links between Terrorists and Saddamn, so ES&D http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...nion&4&wvx-300 Bob Kerrey, a former Democratic senator from Nebraska and now a member of the commission, said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America" he believes Clinton should have been more aggressive in going after al-Qaeda following the ship attack. "I think he did have enough proof to take action," Kerrey said. "That's a difference of opinion." Bill O'Reilly? Nothing more than another Limbaugh-type entertainer. So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message. Look here, buttwipe, I have no interest in what you think is or is not credible. Got it? O'Reilly is just another right-wing rabble rouser. You may think he spews "the truth," but that's because you're a neocon wanna-be. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... mono sect wrote: There are many links between Terrorists and Saddamn, so ES&D http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...nion&4&wvx-300 Bob Kerrey, a former Democratic senator from Nebraska and now a member of the commission, said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America" he believes Clinton should have been more aggressive in going after al-Qaeda following the ship attack. "I think he did have enough proof to take action," Kerrey said. "That's a difference of opinion." Bill O'Reilly? Nothing more than another Limbaugh-type entertainer. So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message. Look here, buttwipe, I have no interest in what you think is or is not credible. Got it? O'Reilly is just another right-wing rabble rouser. You may think he spews "the truth," but that's because you're a neocon wanna-be. I never stated anything about O'Reilly and whether I believe in what he says. I simply asked you to address points of the message he gave that are not true, something that you still cannot do. You then attack me and call me childish names for doing so. This is your typical MO when you are again caught in a corner. Laughable. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"Harry Krause" wrote in message Look here, buttwipe, I have no interest in what you think is or is not credible. Got it? O'Reilly is just another right-wing rabble rouser. You may think he spews "the truth," but that's because you're a neocon wanna-be. A standard Krause response - focused, relevent, succinct. LOL |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in theteeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
John Gaquin wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message Look here, buttwipe, I have no interest in what you think is or is not credible. Got it? O'Reilly is just another right-wing rabble rouser. You may think he spews "the truth," but that's because you're a neocon wanna-be. A standard Krause response - focused, relevent, succinct. LOL Indeed, and perhaps someday you'll learn to think, write, and spell. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
"John Gaquin" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message Look here, buttwipe, I have no interest in what you think is or is not credible. Got it? O'Reilly is just another right-wing rabble rouser. You may think he spews "the truth," but that's because you're a neocon wanna-be. A standard Krause response - focused, relevent, succinct. LOL Indeed....he has yet to address the initial question. It is fun though making Krause twist and turn like a puppet. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
Harry Krause wrote in message ...
jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... mono sect wrote: There are many links between Terrorists and Saddamn, so ES&D http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player...nion&4&wvx-300 Bob Kerrey, a former Democratic senator from Nebraska and now a member of the commission, said Friday on ABC's "Good Morning America" he believes Clinton should have been more aggressive in going after al-Qaeda following the ship attack. "I think he did have enough proof to take action," Kerrey said. "That's a difference of opinion." Bill O'Reilly? Nothing more than another Limbaugh-type entertainer. So what exactly did he say that was incorrect Harry? If you want to be credible do not attack the messenger...attack the message. Look here, buttwipe, I have no interest in what you think is or is not credible. Got it? O'Reilly is just another right-wing rabble rouser. You may think he spews "the truth," but that's because you're a neocon wanna-be. Ahhh.. name calling. The last bastion of the intellectually inferior. The final argument for the wiseguy without an arguement. "Neocon wanna-be"... Perhaps you could enlighten me as to what EXACTLY a neocon wanna-be really is? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Bill O'Reilly's Talking Points kicks Liberal lying sacks in the teeth on al-Qaida Saddamn links
|