|
Can Tow from Florida to Northeast for $$
|
Can Tow from Florida to Northeast for $$
|
Can Tow from Florida to Northeast for $$
|
Can Tow from Florida to Northeast for $$
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 16 Sep 2003 06:21:21 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message In this case, what matters is whether you can be guilty of neglect and guilty of more than neglect at the same time. If someone claims they were guilty of neglect and then also claims they were guilty of more than neglect, that does not in any way mean they were lying when they claimed they were guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere I've said that I was NOT guilty of neglect. THAT is what's necessary for you to be correct in saying I was lying. If you can't do that (and you haven't yet) then you owe me an apology. Then why did you say this: Ah, so here we have more proof that you think "neglect" means the same thing at "forgot". I'll be nice to you today and teach you something... Hint, they don't mean the same thing. In fact, they aren't even related. You don't have a point, do you. One has nothing to do with the other. Forget and neglect don't mean the same thing. So what. That has nothing to do with the fact that someone can be guilty of neglect and more than neglect at the same time. You have yet to show anywhere that I said I wasn't guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere that I lied long after you said you could. You still owe me an apology. Steve It has EVERYTHING to do with it, you twit. I said you were a liar. Why? Because you stated that you were "guilty of neglect". Then, when I said something about it, you retorted with you simply forgot. And, as you have pointed out FOR me, "one has nothing to do with the other". So, alas, you ARE a liar. Now, which one WAS the lie? Was it the part where you said that you WERE guilty of neglect, or the part where you said you "simply forgot"? Remember, now, you've just stated AGAIN, they are two entirely different things. |
Can Tow from Florida to Northeast for $$
On 17 Sep 2003 04:20:35 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 16 Sep 2003 06:21:21 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message In this case, what matters is whether you can be guilty of neglect and guilty of more than neglect at the same time. If someone claims they were guilty of neglect and then also claims they were guilty of more than neglect, that does not in any way mean they were lying when they claimed they were guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere I've said that I was NOT guilty of neglect. THAT is what's necessary for you to be correct in saying I was lying. If you can't do that (and you haven't yet) then you owe me an apology. Then why did you say this: Ah, so here we have more proof that you think "neglect" means the same thing at "forgot". I'll be nice to you today and teach you something... Hint, they don't mean the same thing. In fact, they aren't even related. You don't have a point, do you. One has nothing to do with the other. Forget and neglect don't mean the same thing. So what. That has nothing to do with the fact that someone can be guilty of neglect and more than neglect at the same time. You have yet to show anywhere that I said I wasn't guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere that I lied long after you said you could. You still owe me an apology. It has EVERYTHING to do with it, you twit. I said you were a liar. Why? Because you stated that you were "guilty of neglect". Then, when I said something about it, you retorted with you simply forgot. And, And that's where you're wrong. I NEVER said I simply forgot. More proof that you're not smart enough to follow a simple conversation and make up strawmen for you to argue against. Or is it your drunken stupor causing you to imagine I said things that I never did? as you have pointed out FOR me, "one has nothing to do with the other". So, alas, you ARE a liar. Now, which one WAS the lie? Was it the part where you said that you WERE guilty of neglect, or the part where you said you "simply forgot"? Remember, now, you've just stated AGAIN, they are two entirely different things. First you have to show where I said I "simply forgot" to change it. If you can't do that, then you defintely owe me an apology for calling me a liar. |
Can Tow from Florida to Northeast for $$
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 17 Sep 2003 04:20:35 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 16 Sep 2003 06:21:21 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message In this case, what matters is whether you can be guilty of neglect and guilty of more than neglect at the same time. If someone claims they were guilty of neglect and then also claims they were guilty of more than neglect, that does not in any way mean they were lying when they claimed they were guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere I've said that I was NOT guilty of neglect. THAT is what's necessary for you to be correct in saying I was lying. If you can't do that (and you haven't yet) then you owe me an apology. Then why did you say this: Ah, so here we have more proof that you think "neglect" means the same thing at "forgot". I'll be nice to you today and teach you something... Hint, they don't mean the same thing. In fact, they aren't even related. You don't have a point, do you. One has nothing to do with the other. Forget and neglect don't mean the same thing. So what. That has nothing to do with the fact that someone can be guilty of neglect and more than neglect at the same time. You have yet to show anywhere that I said I wasn't guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere that I lied long after you said you could. You still owe me an apology. It has EVERYTHING to do with it, you twit. I said you were a liar. Why? Because you stated that you were "guilty of neglect". Then, when I said something about it, you retorted with you simply forgot. And, And that's where you're wrong. I NEVER said I simply forgot. More proof that you're not smart enough to follow a simple conversation and make up strawmen for you to argue against. Or is it your drunken stupor causing you to imagine I said things that I never did? as you have pointed out FOR me, "one has nothing to do with the other". So, alas, you ARE a liar. Now, which one WAS the lie? Was it the part where you said that you WERE guilty of neglect, or the part where you said you "simply forgot"? Remember, now, you've just stated AGAIN, they are two entirely different things. First you have to show where I said I "simply forgot" to change it. If you can't do that, then you defintely owe me an apology for calling me a liar. You idiot, you really DON'T get it, do you? I am VERY surprised, I had given you way too much credit in my mind. I honestly thought you had at least SOME sense, but alas, I see that is not true, you are dumber than a chimp!!! |
Can Tow from Florida to Northeast for $$
On 18 Sep 2003 04:19:29 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 17 Sep 2003 04:20:35 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 16 Sep 2003 06:21:21 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message In this case, what matters is whether you can be guilty of neglect and guilty of more than neglect at the same time. If someone claims they were guilty of neglect and then also claims they were guilty of more than neglect, that does not in any way mean they were lying when they claimed they were guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere I've said that I was NOT guilty of neglect. THAT is what's necessary for you to be correct in saying I was lying. If you can't do that (and you haven't yet) then you owe me an apology. Then why did you say this: Ah, so here we have more proof that you think "neglect" means the same thing at "forgot". I'll be nice to you today and teach you something... Hint, they don't mean the same thing. In fact, they aren't even related. You don't have a point, do you. One has nothing to do with the other. Forget and neglect don't mean the same thing. So what. That has nothing to do with the fact that someone can be guilty of neglect and more than neglect at the same time. You have yet to show anywhere that I said I wasn't guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere that I lied long after you said you could. You still owe me an apology. It has EVERYTHING to do with it, you twit. I said you were a liar. Why? Because you stated that you were "guilty of neglect". Then, when I said something about it, you retorted with you simply forgot. And, And that's where you're wrong. I NEVER said I simply forgot. More proof that you're not smart enough to follow a simple conversation and make up strawmen for you to argue against. Or is it your drunken stupor causing you to imagine I said things that I never did? as you have pointed out FOR me, "one has nothing to do with the other". So, alas, you ARE a liar. Now, which one WAS the lie? Was it the part where you said that you WERE guilty of neglect, or the part where you said you "simply forgot"? Remember, now, you've just stated AGAIN, they are two entirely different things. First you have to show where I said I "simply forgot" to change it. If you can't do that, then you defintely owe me an apology for calling me a liar. You idiot, you really DON'T get it, do you? I am VERY surprised, I had given you way too much credit in my mind. I honestly thought you had at least SOME sense, but alas, I see that is not true, you are dumber than a chimp!!! From the above, it's obvious that you can't show where I said I "simply forgot" because if you could, you would have. Now you finally realize in that shriveled vestigial brain of yours that you were wrong when you called me a liar. But you're to much of a wimp to admit it. So instead you write the meaningless crap above. What a dumb wimp you are. Steve |
Can Tow from Florida to Northeast for $$
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ...
On 18 Sep 2003 04:19:29 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 17 Sep 2003 04:20:35 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 16 Sep 2003 06:21:21 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message In this case, what matters is whether you can be guilty of neglect and guilty of more than neglect at the same time. If someone claims they were guilty of neglect and then also claims they were guilty of more than neglect, that does not in any way mean they were lying when they claimed they were guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere I've said that I was NOT guilty of neglect. THAT is what's necessary for you to be correct in saying I was lying. If you can't do that (and you haven't yet) then you owe me an apology. Then why did you say this: Ah, so here we have more proof that you think "neglect" means the same thing at "forgot". I'll be nice to you today and teach you something... Hint, they don't mean the same thing. In fact, they aren't even related. You don't have a point, do you. One has nothing to do with the other. Forget and neglect don't mean the same thing. So what. That has nothing to do with the fact that someone can be guilty of neglect and more than neglect at the same time. You have yet to show anywhere that I said I wasn't guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere that I lied long after you said you could. You still owe me an apology. It has EVERYTHING to do with it, you twit. I said you were a liar. Why? Because you stated that you were "guilty of neglect". Then, when I said something about it, you retorted with you simply forgot. And, And that's where you're wrong. I NEVER said I simply forgot. More proof that you're not smart enough to follow a simple conversation and make up strawmen for you to argue against. Or is it your drunken stupor causing you to imagine I said things that I never did? as you have pointed out FOR me, "one has nothing to do with the other". So, alas, you ARE a liar. Now, which one WAS the lie? Was it the part where you said that you WERE guilty of neglect, or the part where you said you "simply forgot"? Remember, now, you've just stated AGAIN, they are two entirely different things. First you have to show where I said I "simply forgot" to change it. If you can't do that, then you defintely owe me an apology for calling me a liar. You idiot, you really DON'T get it, do you? I am VERY surprised, I had given you way too much credit in my mind. I honestly thought you had at least SOME sense, but alas, I see that is not true, you are dumber than a chimp!!! From the above, it's obvious that you can't show where I said I "simply forgot" because if you could, you would have. Now you finally realize in that shriveled vestigial brain of yours that you were wrong when you called me a liar. But you're to much of a wimp to admit it. So instead you write the meaningless crap above. What a dumb wimp you are. Steve Again, punk, if I'm such a "wimp", let's meet up. We can put your Karate experience to the test, okay? |
Can Tow from Florida to Northeast for $$
On 19 Sep 2003 03:46:28 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:
(Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 18 Sep 2003 04:19:29 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 17 Sep 2003 04:20:35 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message ... On 16 Sep 2003 06:21:21 -0700, (basskisser) wrote: (Steven Shelikoff) wrote in message In this case, what matters is whether you can be guilty of neglect and guilty of more than neglect at the same time. If someone claims they were guilty of neglect and then also claims they were guilty of more than neglect, that does not in any way mean they were lying when they claimed they were guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere I've said that I was NOT guilty of neglect. THAT is what's necessary for you to be correct in saying I was lying. If you can't do that (and you haven't yet) then you owe me an apology. Then why did you say this: Ah, so here we have more proof that you think "neglect" means the same thing at "forgot". I'll be nice to you today and teach you something... Hint, they don't mean the same thing. In fact, they aren't even related. You don't have a point, do you. One has nothing to do with the other. Forget and neglect don't mean the same thing. So what. That has nothing to do with the fact that someone can be guilty of neglect and more than neglect at the same time. You have yet to show anywhere that I said I wasn't guilty of neglect. You have yet to show anywhere that I lied long after you said you could. You still owe me an apology. It has EVERYTHING to do with it, you twit. I said you were a liar. Why? Because you stated that you were "guilty of neglect". Then, when I said something about it, you retorted with you simply forgot. And, And that's where you're wrong. I NEVER said I simply forgot. More proof that you're not smart enough to follow a simple conversation and make up strawmen for you to argue against. Or is it your drunken stupor causing you to imagine I said things that I never did? as you have pointed out FOR me, "one has nothing to do with the other". So, alas, you ARE a liar. Now, which one WAS the lie? Was it the part where you said that you WERE guilty of neglect, or the part where you said you "simply forgot"? Remember, now, you've just stated AGAIN, they are two entirely different things. First you have to show where I said I "simply forgot" to change it. If you can't do that, then you defintely owe me an apology for calling me a liar. You idiot, you really DON'T get it, do you? I am VERY surprised, I had given you way too much credit in my mind. I honestly thought you had at least SOME sense, but alas, I see that is not true, you are dumber than a chimp!!! From the above, it's obvious that you can't show where I said I "simply forgot" because if you could, you would have. Now you finally realize in that shriveled vestigial brain of yours that you were wrong when you called me a liar. But you're to much of a wimp to admit it. So instead you write the meaningless crap above. What a dumb wimp you are. Again, punk, if I'm such a "wimp", let's meet up. We can put your Karate experience to the test, okay? Well, at least you realize you're to stupid to engage verbally. And to much of a baby to apologize when you know you should. Steve |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com