Terrorism UP under Bush Regime
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 11:10:27 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 01:36:24 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:


"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Butch Davis wrote:
Harry,

Your logic is, as ever, faultless. It's clear to every moron
that
it's
Bush
who is at fault for incorrect information being realeased.


The Bush misAdministration has been feeding us misinformation from
the
idiot's first day in office, especially on its fraudulent War on
Terrorism.

http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtri...reaking_1.html



Repeat after me:

1) I'm Bert, and I don't understand why my president intentionally
gave
Saddam so much time to ship his weapons elsewhere.

2) I'm Bert, and I have no idea why I posted this in response to an
article
about the measurement of terrorist activities.


Your President wasted too much time seeking the approval of the UN and
Congress
before he took action. That was a boo-boo.

John H

U.N.: Dead issue at this point.

Congress: That's the law. We know he'd like to function outside of it,
but
as things stand, he has to follow protocol.

Nevertheless, your dead issue provided all the time Saddam needed to do
whatever
he wanted with his weapons.

John H

Bush knew he was not going to wait for U.N. blessings. Rather than go
through the motions, he should've jumped, rather than spend 8 months talking
like a cowboy. But, none of this really matters. It was actually better for
Bush's handlers if things got worse. Surely you understand why.

Terrorism UP under Bush Regime
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

Bush knew he was not going to wait for U.N. blessings. Rather than go
through the motions, he should've jumped, rather than spend 8 months
talking
like a cowboy. But, none of this really matters. It was actually better
for
Bush's handlers if things got worse. Surely you understand why.


Un****ingbelievable.

Terrorism UP under Bush Regime
 

On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 08:38:10 -0400, DSK wrote:


This is just great... now it's the darn libby-rulls fault that we can't
those WMDs... we gave Saddam too much time to hide 'em!

Never never never could be even remotely considered that they didn't
exist.

The sites referred to were looted. Hopefully by Iraqis trying to make a
buck, and not by terrorists. Begs the question why the coalition forces
didn't guard them or dismantle them. Perhaps, they weren't the threat
once thought.

http://www.iraq.net/displayarticle4166.html

Terrorism UP under Bush Regime
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Butch Davis wrote:
Harry,

Your logic is, as ever, faultless. It's clear to every moron that it's
Bush
who is at fault for incorrect information being realeased.


The Bush misAdministration has been feeding us misinformation from the
idiot's first day in office, especially on its fraudulent War on
Terrorism.


Furthermore, who
but the most moronic could have any doubt that his actions are the
driving
force behind international terrorism in Spain, Africa, Asia and the
Middle
East. Who else could we blame for this mess? Certainly Al Queda has
had no
part in the slaughter?

Ahhhh. You think there is no connection between Bush's attacks on
Afghanistan and invasion of Iraq and the escalation of terrorist
activities?



Funny that you mention Afghanistan in the same breath as Iraq. So you think
we shouldn't have gone into Afghanistan because it has caused an "escalation
of terrorist activities"?

Terrorism UP under Bush Regime
 

"Joe" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

Bush knew he was not going to wait for U.N. blessings. Rather than go
through the motions, he should've jumped, rather than spend 8 months
talking
like a cowboy. But, none of this really matters. It was actually better
for
Bush's handlers if things got worse. Surely you understand why.


Un****ingbelievable.


Doug is quite the conpiracist, Joe. I guess he was getting jealous of
basskisser holding the "stupidest-poster-on-rec.boats" title all to himself.

Terrorism UP under Bush Regime
 

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Butch Davis wrote:

Harry,

Your logic is, as ever, faultless. It's clear to every moron that it's

Bush

who is at fault for incorrect information being realeased.


The Bush misAdministration has been feeding us misinformation from the
idiot's first day in office, especially on its fraudulent War on

Terrorism.


Furthermore, who

but the most moronic could have any doubt that his actions are the

driving

force behind international terrorism in Spain, Africa, Asia and the

Middle

East. Who else could we blame for this mess? Certainly Al Queda has

had no

part in the slaughter?

Ahhhh. You think there is no connection between Bush's attacks on
Afghanistan and invasion of Iraq and the escalation of terrorist
activities?




Funny that you mention Afghanistan in the same breath as Iraq. So you think
we shouldn't have gone into Afghanistan because it has caused an "escalation
of terrorist activities"?




For the first few days after 9-11, my government had me convinced the
country of Afghanistan was the perpetrator of that particular horror.
But then we started receiving some facts and it became apparent that
Afghanistan was not to blame.

I'm not sure why we went into Afghanistan, other than to give the Bush
misAdministration a chance to show Americans it was doing "something
about terrorism." Oh...and we picked up a few of Osama's boys and
toppled an incompetent, repressive government that didn't like us so we
could replace it with an incompetent, repressive government that doesn't
like us a little less.

Terrorism UP under Bush Regime
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Joe" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

Bush knew he was not going to wait for U.N. blessings. Rather than go
through the motions, he should've jumped, rather than spend 8 months
talking
like a cowboy. But, none of this really matters. It was actually
better
for
Bush's handlers if things got worse. Surely you understand why.


Un****ingbelievable.


Doug is quite the conpiracist, Joe. I guess he was getting jealous of
basskisser holding the "stupidest-poster-on-rec.boats" title all to
himself.



I'm not suggesting a conspiracy, child.

Back to the facts I stated above: We all (including you) know that the
situation in Iraq BEFORE the war wasn't nearly as hideous as your leader
suggested. Virtually all his reasons have melted away. Of course, he knew
this beforehand, so it made sense to rattle his sabre for as long as
possible in order to give various factions time to get warmed up.

This is what happens when a president formulates foreign policy (and perhaps
his entire world view) around the movie "Hang 'em High".

Terrorism UP under Bush Regime
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

So you think
we shouldn't have gone into Afghanistan because it has caused an
"escalation
of terrorist activities"?

At your trade school, did you learn anything about COMPLEX SYSTEMS? If so,
how do you suppose it might apply to your question, above?

Terrorism UP under Bush Regime
 

Doug Kanter wrote:

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Joe" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...


Bush knew he was not going to wait for U.N. blessings. Rather than go
through the motions, he should've jumped, rather than spend 8 months

talking

like a cowboy. But, none of this really matters. It was actually

better

for

Bush's handlers if things got worse. Surely you understand why.


Un****ingbelievable.


Doug is quite the conpiracist, Joe. I guess he was getting jealous of
basskisser holding the "stupidest-poster-on-rec.boats" title all to

himself.



I'm not suggesting a conspiracy, child.

Back to the facts I stated above: We all (including you) know that the
situation in Iraq BEFORE the war wasn't nearly as hideous as your leader
suggested. Virtually all his reasons have melted away. Of course, he knew
this beforehand, so it made sense to rattle his sabre for as long as
possible in order to give various factions time to get warmed up.

This is what happens when a president formulates foreign policy (and perhaps
his entire world view) around the movie "Hang 'em High".




That simple-minded view of the world is shared by most of the righties
here, in case you haven't noticed. The sort of terrorism we're facing
today is the result of a myriad of complexities. This is not the war of
our fathers and grandfathers, where we were facing the evil Germans and
Japanese, and we knew where they were and most everyone wore some sort
of uniform. Today's terrorism is the result of right-wing religious
hatred and simple-mindedness, poverty, jealousy, ignorance, desperation,
starvation, decades of indignities (real and perceived) and much
more. Unfortunately, the simple-minded twits running the US government
these days only recognize black or white and, in reality, they don't
perceive those "colors" too well, either.

Hopefully, this fall we'll have a regime change in Washington, D.C.

Terrorism UP under Bush Regime
 

On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 09:56:32 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Doug Kanter wrote:

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Joe" wrote in message
.. .

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...


Bush knew he was not going to wait for U.N. blessings. Rather than go
through the motions, he should've jumped, rather than spend 8 months

talking

like a cowboy. But, none of this really matters. It was actually

better

for

Bush's handlers if things got worse. Surely you understand why.


Un****ingbelievable.


Doug is quite the conpiracist, Joe. I guess he was getting jealous of
basskisser holding the "stupidest-poster-on-rec.boats" title all to

himself.



I'm not suggesting a conspiracy, child.

Back to the facts I stated above: We all (including you) know that the
situation in Iraq BEFORE the war wasn't nearly as hideous as your leader
suggested. Virtually all his reasons have melted away. Of course, he knew
this beforehand, so it made sense to rattle his sabre for as long as
possible in order to give various factions time to get warmed up.

This is what happens when a president formulates foreign policy (and perhaps
his entire world view) around the movie "Hang 'em High".




That simple-minded view of the world is shared by most of the righties
here, in case you haven't noticed. The sort of terrorism we're facing
today is the result of a myriad of complexities. This is not the war of
our fathers and grandfathers, where we were facing the evil Germans and
Japanese, and we knew where they were and most everyone wore some sort
of uniform. Today's terrorism is the result of right-wing religious
hatred and simple-mindedness, poverty, jealousy, ignorance, desperation,
starvation, decades of indignities (real and perceived) and much
more. Unfortunately, the simple-minded twits running the US government
these days only recognize black or white and, in reality, they don't
perceive those "colors" too well, either.

Hopefully, this fall we'll have a regime change in Washington, D.C.

Bull hockey! These terrorists are not starving, poverty ridden, ignorant,
desperate, etc. etc. That is garbage. Quit trying to make terrorism sound as
though it's our fault. What tripe.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!