Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:48:32 +0000, NOYB wrote:
Because of the CIA's long history of recruiting its assets at Oxford? http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/CLIN-CIA.HTM Hmm, so he wasn't a draft dodger. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "thunder" wrote in message news ![]() On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:48:32 +0000, NOYB wrote: Because of the CIA's long history of recruiting its assets at Oxford? http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/CLIN-CIA.HTM Hmm, so he wasn't a draft dodger. Just because it was the CIA that kept him out of the war, doesn't mean he wasn't a draft dodger. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "thunder" wrote in message news ![]() On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:48:32 +0000, NOYB wrote: Because of the CIA's long history of recruiting its assets at Oxford? http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/CLIN-CIA.HTM Hmm, so he wasn't a draft dodger. Just because it was the CIA that kept him out of the war, doesn't mean he wasn't a draft dodger. Let's see if I have this straight. FYI, Nixon's cover was blown by 1970. It was clear that he was not playing with a full deck. Anyone who was honest knew the war was a sham, and the reasons behind it had been discredited at least 5 years earlier. The secretary of defense even said the whole thing was ridiculous. Clinton hooks up with the CIA, which is looking FORWARD toward the next issue, and that's not a way of serving his country? Are you emptying out the drug cabinet into your arm all day long? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "thunder" wrote in message news ![]() On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:48:32 +0000, NOYB wrote: Because of the CIA's long history of recruiting its assets at Oxford? http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/CLIN-CIA.HTM Hmm, so he wasn't a draft dodger. Just because it was the CIA that kept him out of the war, doesn't mean he wasn't a draft dodger. Let's see if I have this straight. FYI, Nixon's cover was blown by 1970. It was clear that he was not playing with a full deck. Anyone who was honest knew the war was a sham, and the reasons behind it had been discredited at least 5 years earlier. The secretary of defense even said the whole thing was ridiculous. Clinton hooks up with the CIA, which is looking FORWARD toward the next issue, and that's not a way of serving his country? Are you emptying out the drug cabinet into your arm all day long? Wow! And I thought you guys would rise to the bait by blasting me for the suggestion that Clinton was recruited by the CIA while at Oxford. Instead, you bite...but in a totally different way. "He was serving his country by working for the CIA". I was suggesting it tongue-in-cheek...and you guys are serious!?!? LOL. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NOYB" wrote in message
k.net... Just because it was the CIA that kept him out of the war, doesn't mean he wasn't a draft dodger. Let's see if I have this straight. FYI, Nixon's cover was blown by 1970. It was clear that he was not playing with a full deck. Anyone who was honest knew the war was a sham, and the reasons behind it had been discredited at least 5 years earlier. The secretary of defense even said the whole thing was ridiculous. Clinton hooks up with the CIA, which is looking FORWARD toward the next issue, and that's not a way of serving his country? Are you emptying out the drug cabinet into your arm all day long? Wow! And I thought you guys would rise to the bait by blasting me for the suggestion that Clinton was recruited by the CIA while at Oxford. Instead, you bite...but in a totally different way. "He was serving his country by working for the CIA". I was suggesting it tongue-in-cheek...and you guys are serious!?!? LOL. The CIA does not recruit mindless idiots like your president. It comes as no surprise that they went after Clinton. They need people who are able to think outside the box.* *The use of the word "box" is not an invitation to cheap humor. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 22:30:29 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... Just because it was the CIA that kept him out of the war, doesn't mean he wasn't a draft dodger. Let's see if I have this straight. FYI, Nixon's cover was blown by 1970. It was clear that he was not playing with a full deck. Anyone who was honest knew the war was a sham, and the reasons behind it had been discredited at least 5 years earlier. The secretary of defense even said the whole thing was ridiculous. Clinton hooks up with the CIA, which is looking FORWARD toward the next issue, and that's not a way of serving his country? Are you emptying out the drug cabinet into your arm all day long? Wow! And I thought you guys would rise to the bait by blasting me for the suggestion that Clinton was recruited by the CIA while at Oxford. Instead, you bite...but in a totally different way. "He was serving his country by working for the CIA". I was suggesting it tongue-in-cheek...and you guys are serious!?!? LOL. The CIA does not recruit mindless idiots like your president. It comes as no surprise that they went after Clinton. They need people who are able to think outside the box.* *The use of the word "box" is not an invitation to cheap humor. Maybe not, but it *was* pretty cheap humor! John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOYB wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message news ![]() On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:48:32 +0000, NOYB wrote: Because of the CIA's long history of recruiting its assets at Oxford? http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/CLIN-CIA.HTM Hmm, so he wasn't a draft dodger. Just because it was the CIA that kept him out of the war, doesn't mean he wasn't a draft dodger. Straining a bit more every day, eh? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Hey Hairball, Kerry is a Joke | General | |||
OT Hanoi John Kerry | General | |||
OT Kerry: Poodle for Rich Women | General | |||
) OT ) Bush's "needless war" | General | |||
Help, Harry, I don't understand (little OT) | General |