Chuck doesn't apologize. He tells everyone that he is "taking a break" from
the newsgroup and by sheer force of will refrains from posting for a month
or two. He gets pushed to the point of breaking and then returns from his
"break" as vicious as ever.

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...
I am still waiting for an apology from Chuck.


"Starbuck" wrote in message
...
Chuck,

What made you think it was JimH? Somehow the writing style of Skipper
and JimH never seemed similar to me.

What is worse, calling someone of fraud or accusing someone of being a
slanderous individual?

wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Skipper wrote:
OlBlueEyes wrote:

chuckgould wrote:
:

Nominee for today's "dumb as a post" post.

Most Libs never learned HOW to think. Not much use in today's world
for
these ghetto trained "intellectuals." Little wonder this one
migrated to
selling used cars, ripping off the public and government in tax
fraud
schemes, and other assorted shyster "deals."

--
Skipper

Oh, look! It's supposedly "Skipper" again. But it isn't, as this
unwarranted personal attack was obviously penned by a deranged and
bitter a-hole. I have met Skipper, and it would be hard to describe
him
in such terms.

So, psuedo-Skipper,
Care to enthrall us with your wind-in-the-teeth tale of surviving
hurricane force winds aboard your 22-foot Bayliner in the Sea of
Cortez?
The version where you claimed to have a bunch of gas cans strapped to
the gunwales, (after some spoil sport observed that your boat doesn't
have the fuel capacity to provide the range for the cruise you
claimed
to make), would be nice. Some details of how you managed to pour the
fuel from those
portable cans into your fuel tank, bouncing around in the midst of
the
Torito hurricane would be interesting as well. (It would probably be
considered polite to spin that yarn "downwind" from the audience).

Of course, you'd need to consult the "real" Skipper for that
information.
Why not check with him, if you can find him, and get back to us?


Why the anger Chuck?


No particular reason beyond the fact that the psuedo-skipper poster
accused me of a felony. It's disgust more than anger. Have you noticed
that when some people lack the ability to discuss an issue on its
merits they turn to personal attack?

The real Skipper was the most outrageous fabricator of imaginary
boating adventures ever seen in this forum. That's no small task,
considering. It's ironic that his sockpuppet-master would make any
comments impuning the honesty of other people or alleging "fraud" while
munging Skipper's name.

I noticed that also. ;-)



"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
Chuck doesn't apologize. He tells everyone that he is "taking a break"
from the newsgroup and by sheer force of will refrains from posting for a
month or two. He gets pushed to the point of breaking and then returns
from his "break" as vicious as ever.

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...
I am still waiting for an apology from Chuck.


"Starbuck" wrote in message
...
Chuck,

What made you think it was JimH? Somehow the writing style of Skipper
and JimH never seemed similar to me.

What is worse, calling someone of fraud or accusing someone of being a
slanderous individual?

wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Skipper wrote:
OlBlueEyes wrote:

chuckgould wrote:
:

Nominee for today's "dumb as a post" post.

Most Libs never learned HOW to think. Not much use in today's world
for
these ghetto trained "intellectuals." Little wonder this one
migrated to
selling used cars, ripping off the public and government in tax
fraud
schemes, and other assorted shyster "deals."

--
Skipper

Oh, look! It's supposedly "Skipper" again. But it isn't, as this
unwarranted personal attack was obviously penned by a deranged and
bitter a-hole. I have met Skipper, and it would be hard to describe
him
in such terms.

So, psuedo-Skipper,
Care to enthrall us with your wind-in-the-teeth tale of surviving
hurricane force winds aboard your 22-foot Bayliner in the Sea of
Cortez?
The version where you claimed to have a bunch of gas cans strapped
to
the gunwales, (after some spoil sport observed that your boat
doesn't
have the fuel capacity to provide the range for the cruise you
claimed
to make), would be nice. Some details of how you managed to pour the
fuel from those
portable cans into your fuel tank, bouncing around in the midst of
the
Torito hurricane would be interesting as well. (It would probably be
considered polite to spin that yarn "downwind" from the audience).

Of course, you'd need to consult the "real" Skipper for that
information.
Why not check with him, if you can find him, and get back to us?


Why the anger Chuck?


No particular reason beyond the fact that the psuedo-skipper poster
accused me of a felony. It's disgust more than anger. Have you noticed
that when some people lack the ability to discuss an issue on its
merits they turn to personal attack?

The real Skipper was the most outrageous fabricator of imaginary
boating adventures ever seen in this forum. That's no small task,
considering. It's ironic that his sockpuppet-master would make any
comments impuning the honesty of other people or alleging "fraud" while
munging Skipper's name.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...

Do the folks on Air America not define who is good and who is bad?

Are they truly fair and balanced, Chuck?

About as much as (or as little as) Limbaugh and his audience of
retarded swine.

So, Doug, are you trying to refute Chuck's statements about Air America?
--
John H

No. AA's listeners are better, smarter and always right. Limbaugh's
aren't.

You found someone asleep while the radio was on AA didn't you?

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...


Do the folks on Air America not define who is good and who is bad?

Are they truly fair and balanced, Chuck?

About as much as (or as little as) Limbaugh and his audience of retarded
swine.

You really don't get it do you? People support Limbaugh by listening to
him which draws advertisements, which sells a myriad of products. This
results in people being employed to make those products, deliver those
products to stores, and where stores sell thoses products.

Limbaugh is an economic engine in the USA.

People don't care if he is right or worng they just like to listen to
him.

They also base voting decisions on what he says. That's sloppy, but not
surprising.

Wrong again Dougie!

Bert Robbins wrote:
Chuck doesn't apologize. He tells everyone that he is "taking a break" from
the newsgroup and by sheer force of will refrains from posting for a month
or two. He gets pushed to the point of breaking and then returns from his
"break" as vicious as ever.


He's just showing he's the better man by exercising control, rather than
rolling in the mud with the rat pack here.

In article ,
says...
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:13:52 -0700, jps wrote:

I cannot stand the thought that money-grubbing pinheads would have
control over what we've built with our blood. The alternative is to get
enough FU money out of the sale to exit, as Eisboch did.

Why not just give it to MoveOn.org as a donation then?

Ok, just kidding. :)

If it makes me rich you can rest assured that move.on will be among the
beneficiaries.

jps

In article ,
says...
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:16:09 -0400, DSK wrote:


Only America-hating fag libby-rulls invest in stocks and they DESERVE to
get ripped off by Republican CEOs!

Welcome to the Dark Side.

Actually, not far from the truth. I've done some personal investigation
of my friend's basis for not wanting to make the water rise for all
ships in the harbor.

I've heard more than once that "those people" aren't smart enough to
make it in the world and there's no reason to share the hard fought
earnings of us smart folks.

They fail to recognize the the odds are stacked against many less
fortunate in a more than unfair way.

That is the dark side, the dark side of human nature.

jps

Harry,
You wit and wisdom is superb. I like the way you made fun of people by
saying they were below "rats", that really was unique and original.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
Chuck doesn't apologize. He tells everyone that he is "taking a break"
from the newsgroup and by sheer force of will refrains from posting for
a month or two. He gets pushed to the point of breaking and then returns
from his "break" as vicious as ever.


He's just showing he's the better man by exercising control, rather than
rolling in the mud with the rat pack here.



You are insulting rats by comparing them to the right-wing pondscum here.

Don,
This is why I have so much fun sparing with you, you always have a razor
sharp wit.


"Don White" wrote in message
...
Starbuck wrote:
Don,
Is it possible that Skipper and Smithers are one and the same?


In this newsgroup, I wouldn't rule anything out. In the past year or so,
I've read certain phrases etc that reminded me of the 'Snipper'...er
'Skipper'. You could be him (Smithers/Skipper for all I know.
I have a hard enough time keeping track of the 'normal people' here.

Don,
Is it your assertion that Harry and Kevin are one and the same? I always
thought Harry was a tad bit smarter than Kevin, but I might be wrong.


"Don White" wrote in message
...
PocoLoco wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:15:26 GMT, Don White
wrote:


Starbuck wrote:

Don,
Is it possible that Skipper and Smithers are one and the same?



In this newsgroup, I wouldn't rule anything out. In the past year or so,
I've read certain phrases etc that reminded me of the 'Snipper'...er
'Skipper'. You could be him (Smithers/Skipper for all I know.
I have a hard enough time keeping track of the 'normal people' here.


Like Harry and Kevin?

Nice that we agree on something John.
We'll squeeze that army life out and get you civilized yet!