On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:39:40 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...


Do the folks on Air America not define who is good and who is bad?

Are they truly fair and balanced, Chuck?

About as much as (or as little as) Limbaugh and his audience of retarded
swine.

You really don't get it do you? People support Limbaugh by listening to
him which draws advertisements, which sells a myriad of products. This
results in people being employed to make those products, deliver those
products to stores, and where stores sell thoses products.

Limbaugh is an economic engine in the USA.

People don't care if he is right or worng they just like to listen to him.

They also base voting decisions on what he says. That's sloppy, but not
surprising.


You shouldn't make voting decisions based on what Limbaugh says, Doug. You
should try to think for yourself, as do most Conservatives.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:36:40 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
. ..

Do the folks on Air America not define who is good and who is bad?

Are they truly fair and balanced, Chuck?

About as much as (or as little as) Limbaugh and his audience of
retarded swine.

So, Doug, are you trying to refute Chuck's statements about Air America?
--
John H

No. AA's listeners are better, smarter and always right. Limbaugh's
aren't.

No - they are always left. :)

drum crash

"Is this an audience or an oil painting?" -Henny Youngman

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:36:40 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
.. .

Do the folks on Air America not define who is good and who is
bad?

Are they truly fair and balanced, Chuck?

About as much as (or as little as) Limbaugh and his audience of
retarded swine.

So, Doug, are you trying to refute Chuck's statements about Air
America?
--
John H

No. AA's listeners are better, smarter and always right. Limbaugh's
aren't.


You're the 'Limbaugh expert' in the group. What does your assertion make
you?

Doug is just showing the typical liebral arrogance..........and then they
wonder why they leep losing elections

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:16:15 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 11:36:40 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"PocoLoco" wrote in message
. ..

Do the folks on Air America not define who is good and who is bad?

Are they truly fair and balanced, Chuck?

About as much as (or as little as) Limbaugh and his audience of
retarded swine.

So, Doug, are you trying to refute Chuck's statements about Air America?
--
John H

No. AA's listeners are better, smarter and always right. Limbaugh's aren't.

No - they are always left. :)

LOL!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

PocoLoco wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 13:15:26 GMT, Don White wrote:


Starbuck wrote:

Don,
Is it possible that Skipper and Smithers are one and the same?



In this newsgroup, I wouldn't rule anything out. In the past year or
so, I've read certain phrases etc that reminded me of the 'Snipper'...er
'Skipper'. You could be him (Smithers/Skipper for all I know.
I have a hard enough time keeping track of the 'normal people' here.


Like Harry and Kevin?

Nice that we agree on something John.
We'll squeeze that army life out and get you civilized yet!

Potland Oregon, obviously.
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:56:50 -0700, "-rick-" wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On 28 Sep 2005 13:01:57 -0700, "

Air America ROCKS!!

Right. Keep on thinking that as it slowly disappears from any type of
outlet.

It's #1 or #2 in Portland and carried by a Clear Channel station
(am620/kpoj).

Portland where?

OlBlueEyes wrote:
Anyone who has all their money tied up in one stock deserves what they
get.

Yeah, that makes it OK for CEOs to lie, cheat, and steal. Those dummies
who invested in stocks should know better.

Good 'conservatives' spend all their money and max out their credit
cards, not to mention buying huge houses they can't really afford,
because it helps the US economy... it's the patriotic thing to do!

Only America-hating fag libby-rulls invest in stocks and they DESERVE to
get ripped off by Republican CEOs!

DSK

*JimH* wrote:
I am still waiting for an apology from Chuck after his accusation.


You will get one when and if I become convinced that I am wrong.
Can't put it any straighter than that.
Yes, there's a statistically miniscule possiblity that two posts, from
two "different" people would use the same exceptionally bizarro
formatting surrounding a quote and an identical opening line a few days
apart. The possibility gets even more remote when one considers that
going after the same third party was the intent of both posts.

You have apologized, when proven wrong, in the past. When proven wrong,
I will do the same.






"Starbuck" wrote in message
...
Chuck,

I agree the current Skipper is a sock puppet, but I have no idea who it
is. My bet is that it is not JimH, but I could be wrong. Heck it could be
Smithers. I also do not think everything "Skipper" relates is true, he
seems to have a chip on his shoulder and is going after you with both
barrels. He has related some stories I had never heard before, so this
must go back a number of years.

In article ,
says...
Eisboch wrote:
... I
realized after a while, however, that the senior management and board of
directors were under immense pressure by outside analysts and investment
managers of 401k and other investment plans to meet the quarterly numbers.
These people in turn are under pressure by the individual investor to manage
their portfolios for max returns. Collectively, all the "small" investors
(via 401k and other retirement accounts) who probably have no idea where
their money is invested, or what product the company makes, have only one
interest - how much money are they making.


Well said.

So, it's a vicious circle.

Yep. Unfortunate. And a vicious circle that we should all take an
interest in getting out of.



Fortunately for me, I was able to exit stage left, as it became more and
more frustrating to convert a labor of love into the big company "corporate"
style.


I'm in somewhat the same boat, except that I am not out of it yet and
may never be. We have managed to form an enclave of sanity within the
larger corporate structure, and at times it's better than before since
we don't have any financial cliff-hangers any more. OTOH I am getting
tired of fighting off greedy corporate hands plucking at our inventory,
our MSAs, and our annual profit sharing.

Regards


Oh Joy,

You guys really made my day. I have to face the fact that I'm going to
work forever and never purchase my fantasy island in the San Juans.

I cannot stand the thought that money-grubbing pinheads would have
control over what we've built with our blood. The alternative is to get
enough FU money out of the sale to exit, as Eisboch did.

jps