Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On 23 Sep 2005 04:58:45 -0700, wrote: They may be listed as wave height, but the underlying wave is a swell, and the waves are considered wind waves on top of the swells. Thank you for making my point, that you were once again WRONG. It should probably be pointed out that "wave height" is the wave top in reference to sea level. If you were there in a boat the wave would actually be close to twice that big since there is also a valley. Wave heights on the Great Lakes are measured "From Trough to Crest". Also, if I remember correctly, Bowditch classifies wave height as the distance from the trough to the crest of a wave, equal to double the amplitude, and measured perpendicular to the direction of advance. This then, should be the correct way to measure wave height. Jim |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() PocoLoco wrote: On 23 Sep 2005 05:05:44 -0700, wrote: *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/Maps/WestGulf.shtml These are the weather bouys. 42001 is right in the path and about 50 miles away (when I typed this note) watch "Combined plot of Wind Speed, Gust, and Air Pressure" and see the storm build. I bet it goes down in the few hours. I watched Kartina come ashore on the east gulf bouys and saw them start dropping offline. Cool! At 1550 GMT, waves at 42001 were 32.5 feet, barometer falling rapidly. What is so cool about that? You twit, it IS cool, cool as hell! I find it very interesting, watching the wave height grow, the barometric pressure fall, etc. Are you really so ****ing uptight that and unconcerned about science that you don't find this stuff fascinating, hence "cool"? Why does it take you 2 or 3 tries to answer a simple question? I have now seen 3 different answers from you on this. Make up your mind already. I may find a storm interesting. I do not find a category 5 hurricane as cool though. BTW: Do you find that using extremely foul language and attacking the other person in your reply somehow makes it more credible? Do you think that folks here have more respect for you by using that language in your replies? I find that it's frustrating getting anything through your thick skull. Do you think that by lying about not posting off topic, lying about not going to call people petty, childish names, lying about not going to post negatively about others makes you more credible? Have you noticed that the only one posting in this thread, that doesn't think that watching the data from the Gulf bouys is cool, is you? Did you notice that I never said that "a category 5 hurricane (is) cool"? Did you notice the cool comment was BEFORE mentioning the data, but was a direct comment to the person posting the LINK?? Hmmm??? Is lying about motorcycles cool? -- John H Time for you to sober up, John. |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Carter" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On 23 Sep 2005 04:58:45 -0700, wrote: They may be listed as wave height, but the underlying wave is a swell, and the waves are considered wind waves on top of the swells. Thank you for making my point, that you were once again WRONG. It should probably be pointed out that "wave height" is the wave top in reference to sea level. If you were there in a boat the wave would actually be close to twice that big since there is also a valley. Wave heights on the Great Lakes are measured "From Trough to Crest". Also, if I remember correctly, Bowditch classifies wave height as the distance from the trough to the crest of a wave, equal to double the amplitude, and measured perpendicular to the direction of advance. This then, should be the correct way to measure wave height. Jim Sounds right, although someone in this discussion (and I'm too relaxed to go back and see who) believes that when your boat comes down from the crest of a wave, it only settles halfway to the trough. I'd love to know how, considering that my yacht's only 14' long and things can get "interesting" in big waves. |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "PocoLoco" wrote in message ... On 23 Sep 2005 05:05:44 -0700, wrote: *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/Maps/WestGulf.shtml These are the weather bouys. 42001 is right in the path and about 50 miles away (when I typed this note) watch "Combined plot of Wind Speed, Gust, and Air Pressure" and see the storm build. I bet it goes down in the few hours. I watched Kartina come ashore on the east gulf bouys and saw them start dropping offline. Cool! At 1550 GMT, waves at 42001 were 32.5 feet, barometer falling rapidly. What is so cool about that? You twit, it IS cool, cool as hell! I find it very interesting, watching the wave height grow, the barometric pressure fall, etc. Are you really so ****ing uptight that and unconcerned about science that you don't find this stuff fascinating, hence "cool"? Why does it take you 2 or 3 tries to answer a simple question? I have now seen 3 different answers from you on this. Make up your mind already. I may find a storm interesting. I do not find a category 5 hurricane as cool though. BTW: Do you find that using extremely foul language and attacking the other person in your reply somehow makes it more credible? Do you think that folks here have more respect for you by using that language in your replies? I find that it's frustrating getting anything through your thick skull. Do you think that by lying about not posting off topic, lying about not going to call people petty, childish names, lying about not going to post negatively about others makes you more credible? Have you noticed that the only one posting in this thread, that doesn't think that watching the data from the Gulf bouys is cool, is you? Did you notice that I never said that "a category 5 hurricane (is) cool"? Did you notice the cool comment was BEFORE mentioning the data, but was a direct comment to the person posting the LINK?? Hmmm??? Is lying about motorcycles cool? His fictional motorcycle is more interesting than your ongoing obsession with it, John. You need to get seriously drunk so you can forget. |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() PocoLoco wrote: On 23 Sep 2005 05:06:51 -0700, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Hundreds may die, millions of property damage is expected, tens of thousands may be homeless, fuel prices will certainly spike sharply.......all from this hurricane Kevin defines as "cool as hell". Unbelievable. I'm not Kevin, asshole. Are you ME? No, thank the stars. I've got a mind, and don't go off on mentally strange tangents where I repeat the same statement in hundreds of posts, over and over and over. Who are you? Why do you ask? |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... PocoLoco wrote: On 23 Sep 2005 05:05:44 -0700, wrote: *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... wrote: http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/Maps/WestGulf.shtml These are the weather bouys. 42001 is right in the path and about 50 miles away (when I typed this note) watch "Combined plot of Wind Speed, Gust, and Air Pressure" and see the storm build. I bet it goes down in the few hours. I watched Kartina come ashore on the east gulf bouys and saw them start dropping offline. Cool! At 1550 GMT, waves at 42001 were 32.5 feet, barometer falling rapidly. What is so cool about that? You twit, it IS cool, cool as hell! I find it very interesting, watching the wave height grow, the barometric pressure fall, etc. Are you really so ****ing uptight that and unconcerned about science that you don't find this stuff fascinating, hence "cool"? Why does it take you 2 or 3 tries to answer a simple question? I have now seen 3 different answers from you on this. Make up your mind already. I may find a storm interesting. I do not find a category 5 hurricane as cool though. BTW: Do you find that using extremely foul language and attacking the other person in your reply somehow makes it more credible? Do you think that folks here have more respect for you by using that language in your replies? I find that it's frustrating getting anything through your thick skull. Do you think that by lying about not posting off topic, lying about not going to call people petty, childish names, lying about not going to post negatively about others makes you more credible? Have you noticed that the only one posting in this thread, that doesn't think that watching the data from the Gulf bouys is cool, is you? Did you notice that I never said that "a category 5 hurricane (is) cool"? Did you notice the cool comment was BEFORE mentioning the data, but was a direct comment to the person posting the LINK?? Hmmm??? Is lying about motorcycles cool? -- John H Time for you to sober up, John. Doctor, we seem to have a difference of opinion for dealing with John's condition. :-) |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Kanter wrote:
Time for you to sober up, John. Doctor, we seem to have a difference of opinion for dealing with John's condition. :-) Treat him for both conditions. Something's bound to work. |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Don White wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: Time for you to sober up, John. Doctor, we seem to have a difference of opinion for dealing with John's condition. :-) Treat him for both conditions. Something's bound to work. Just put him out of his misery, like an old broken down horse. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anchor watch with GPS | General | |||
Citizen Yachting Watch - JR4xxx | General | |||
Citizen Yachting Watch - JR4xxx | ASA | |||
sailing/scuba watch | General | |||
A watch that I finally bought | General |