Harry Krause wrote:
Jim Carter wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
...............snip............

We really need a legal mechanism that will allow the removal of an
incompetent like Bush. Waiting four years isn't good enough.


What you need then, is a Parliamentary Democracy like what we have in
Canada. If our country's leader screws up, he is removed by a vote
of "non
confidence" It has been done in the past and most likely will be
done in
the future. It keeps the country's leader on his/her toes.

Jim



Yes, I have stated before I am a fan of the British parliamentary
system, which is used by many of the world's serious democracies.


Trouble is...if the governing party has a majority they can run
roughshod over us for up to 5 years. (eg Mulroney)

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
OK Kevin, who said this?:
===========================
Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't have a
boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was
awfully
interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one, posting
pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who really
don't
have one!
============================

Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here about
their
boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do not
own
one.

I wonder who said that?

Hmmm.

I'm not Kevin, dimwit.


Then why did you reply to my post to Kevin?

Because he is the "King"

On 22 Sep 2005 05:55:53 -0700, wrote:


Jim Carter wrote:
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
ink.net...

No one pays any attention to you, because you're almost always WRONG.
Hey, remember that 35hp Wankel snowmobile you claimed would go
75mph??!!!


They made my snowmobile. And how fast did your Desmo go?

I don't know about your 35 hp Wankel snowmobile and the 75 MPH, but, I do
know about my neighbor's Skiroule with a twin Sachs Wankel engine that would
go faster than that!

But the Evinrudes were huge, heavy beasts, powered by a single rotor
Wankel, and wouldn't get anywhere NEAR 75mph. I'd wager they'd never
see 50. Hell, they even had reverse, because you couldn't pick the back
end up to turn it around!!!

Back in the late 60's or very early 70's, I owned a very fast Skidoo. I
thought it was the fastest snowmobile around until my neighbor's new
Skiroule, with it's ice pick studded track came out onto the frozen lake and
made my machine look like it was standing still when I was traveling at over
65 MPH. I am not sure of the HP of the Skiroule, but, if I remember
correctly it was around the 35 or 40 HP. That Skiroule was FAST!!!!

My fastest snowmobile was a Boa-Ski, with a twin Hirth 440. One a lot
of races at the local track with that one, and it BARELY hit 75!

Did you tow the snowmobile (real?) behind your fake Guzzi?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 22 Sep 2005 05:48:23 -0700, wrote:


Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
I will vote against this vitally important nomination.

Win or lose on this vote, it is essential that we act on our deepest
convictions. And I refuse to vote for a Supreme Court nominee who came
before the Senate intent on demonstrating his ability to deftly deflect
legitimate questions about his views, opinions and philosophy.


Harry Krause? Kevin of Georgia?

No one pays any attention to you, because you're almost always WRONG.
Hey, remember that 35hp Wankel snowmobile you claimed would go
75mph??!!!


They made my snowmobile. And how fast did your Desmo go?

They made an Evinrude snowmobile powered by a 35hp Wankel that went
75mph? Have ANY evidence of that? Answer: NO, it was an out and out lie.

Have any evidence of your Desmo? Answers: NO! It was an out and out lie.

You are absolutely hilarious, especially for an adolescent.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 22 Sep 2005 05:56:54 -0700, wrote:


PocoLoco wrote:
On 21 Sep 2005 11:45:49 -0700, wrote:

I will vote against this vitally important nomination.

Win or lose on this vote, it is essential that we act on our deepest
convictions. And I refuse to vote for a Supreme Court nominee who came
before the Senate intent on demonstrating his ability to deftly deflect
legitimate questions about his views, opinions and philosophy.

Almost as ridiculous as one who would brag about owning a non-existent
motorcycle, yes?
--
John H

Who said it, John? Do you really think it's a ridiculous statement??

*You* said you owned a Moto Guzzi 'Desmo', and yes, it was a ridiculous
statement.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
OK Kevin, who said this?:
===========================
Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't have
a
boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was
awfully
interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one,
posting
pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who really
don't
have one!
============================

Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here about
their
boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do not
own
one.

I wonder who said that?

Hmmm.

I'm not Kevin, dimwit.


Then why did you reply to my post to Kevin?

Because you are replying to ME, you dumb ****!!! Do you not see that?
It would be exactly the same if I read one of your idiotic posts, hit
the reply button, then said, hey, Harry, quit posting off topic. My
god, you are stupid.


Bassy, why are you continuing to reply to posts I direct to Kevin? Seeing
that you reply to these posts and your email addy is ,
one would think you are indeed Kevin Noble.

Try again, idiot, you are wrong. As usual. If you were posting
something "direct to Kevin", why would you do it in a form of a reply
to ME, asshole? By the way, above, I was replying to a post by you. In
that reply, I called you "dumb ****", see it up there? Well, you
replied, and by your idiotic way of thinking, one could say that your
name IS "dumb ****", correct?

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
OK Kevin, who said this?:
===========================
Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't have
a
boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was
awfully
interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one,
posting
pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who really
don't
have one!
============================

Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here about
their
boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do not
own
one.

I wonder who said that?

Hmmm.

I'm not Kevin, dimwit.


Then why did you reply to my post to Kevin?

Because you are replying to ME, you dumb ****!!! Do you not see that?
It would be exactly the same if I read one of your idiotic posts, hit
the reply button, then said, hey, Harry, quit posting off topic. My
god, you are stupid.


Bassy, why are you continuing to reply to posts I direct to Kevin? Seeing
that you reply to these posts and your email addy is ,
one would think you are indeed Kevin Noble.

And what is it you constantly accuse others of?

Oh yes, foul language and childish insults.


Difference is, dumb ass, I never said I'd stop. YOU did, liar.

My, my.

Your what?

wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
OK Kevin, who said this?:
===========================
Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't
have
a
boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was
awfully
interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one,
posting
pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who
really
don't
have one!
============================

Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here
about
their
boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do
not
own
one.

I wonder who said that?

Hmmm.

I'm not Kevin, dimwit.


Then why did you reply to my post to Kevin?

Because you are replying to ME, you dumb ****!!! Do you not see that?
It would be exactly the same if I read one of your idiotic posts, hit
the reply button, then said, hey, Harry, quit posting off topic. My
god, you are stupid.


Bassy, why are you continuing to reply to posts I direct to Kevin?
Seeing
that you reply to these posts and your email addy is
,
one would think you are indeed Kevin Noble.

Try again, idiot, you are wrong. As usual. If you were posting
something "direct to Kevin", why would you do it in a form of a reply
to ME, asshole? By the way, above, I was replying to a post by you. In
that reply, I called you "dumb ****", see it up there? Well, you
replied, and by your idiotic way of thinking, one could say that your
name IS "dumb ****", correct?


Potty mouth.

So how about telling us about your boat Kevin? I cannot recall you ever
posting anything on topic, so maybe me asking you about your boat (if you
have one) can be a first step for you.

wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
OK Kevin, who said this?:
===========================
Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't
have
a
boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was
awfully
interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one,
posting
pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who
really
don't
have one!
============================

Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here
about
their
boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do
not
own
one.

I wonder who said that?

Hmmm.

I'm not Kevin, dimwit.


Then why did you reply to my post to Kevin?

Because you are replying to ME, you dumb ****!!! Do you not see that?
It would be exactly the same if I read one of your idiotic posts, hit
the reply button, then said, hey, Harry, quit posting off topic. My
god, you are stupid.


Bassy, why are you continuing to reply to posts I direct to Kevin?
Seeing
that you reply to these posts and your email addy is
,
one would think you are indeed Kevin Noble.

And what is it you constantly accuse others of?

Oh yes, foul language and childish insults.


Difference is, dumb ass, I never said I'd stop. YOU did, liar.

Yes, I did a long time ago. And yes, you never did stop.

wrote in message
oups.com...

Jim Carter wrote:
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
ink.net...

No one pays any attention to you, because you're almost always WRONG.
Hey, remember that 35hp Wankel snowmobile you claimed would go
75mph??!!!


They made my snowmobile. And how fast did your Desmo go?

I don't know about your 35 hp Wankel snowmobile and the 75 MPH, but, I do
know about my neighbor's Skiroule with a twin Sachs Wankel engine that
would
go faster than that!

But the Evinrudes were huge, heavy beasts, powered by a single rotor
Wankel, and wouldn't get anywhere NEAR 75mph. I'd wager they'd never
see 50. Hell, they even had reverse, because you couldn't pick the back
end up to turn it around!!!

Back in the late 60's or very early 70's, I owned a very fast Skidoo. I
thought it was the fastest snowmobile around until my neighbor's new
Skiroule, with it's ice pick studded track came out onto the frozen lake
and
made my machine look like it was standing still when I was traveling at
over
65 MPH. I am not sure of the HP of the Skiroule, but, if I remember
correctly it was around the 35 or 40 HP. That Skiroule was FAST!!!!

My fastest snowmobile was a Boa-Ski, with a twin Hirth 440. One a lot
of races at the local track with that one, and it BARELY hit 75!


Bwaaaahaaaaa.

As to reverse, was a easy addition to the tranny. Was using it one day, and
a couple was near on their sled. The lady said, I really would like that
feature. And a single rotor Wankle had lots of power. As to being cold, we
do not see the really cold the midwest and east coast sees.