|
OT Righties, who said this:
I will vote against this vitally important nomination.
Win or lose on this vote, it is essential that we act on our deepest convictions. And I refuse to vote for a Supreme Court nominee who came before the Senate intent on demonstrating his ability to deftly deflect legitimate questions about his views, opinions and philosophy. |
OK Kevin, who said this?:
=========================== Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't have a boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was awfully interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one, posting pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who really don't have one! ============================ Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here about their boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do not own one. I wonder who said that? Hmmm. |
wrote in message oups.com... I will vote against this vitally important nomination. Win or lose on this vote, it is essential that we act on our deepest convictions. And I refuse to vote for a Supreme Court nominee who came before the Senate intent on demonstrating his ability to deftly deflect legitimate questions about his views, opinions and philosophy. Harry Krause? Kevin of Georgia? |
*JimH* wrote: OK Kevin, who said this?: =========================== Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't have a boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was awfully interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one, posting pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who really don't have one! ============================ Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here about their boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do not own one. I wonder who said that? Hmmm. I'm not Kevin, dimwit. |
Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... I will vote against this vitally important nomination. Win or lose on this vote, it is essential that we act on our deepest convictions. And I refuse to vote for a Supreme Court nominee who came before the Senate intent on demonstrating his ability to deftly deflect legitimate questions about his views, opinions and philosophy. Harry Krause? Kevin of Georgia? No one pays any attention to you, because you're almost always WRONG. Hey, remember that 35hp Wankel snowmobile you claimed would go 75mph??!!! |
wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: OK Kevin, who said this?: =========================== Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't have a boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was awfully interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one, posting pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who really don't have one! ============================ Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here about their boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do not own one. I wonder who said that? Hmmm. I'm not Kevin, dimwit. Then why did you reply to my post to Kevin? |
|
Harry,
Do you empathy for someone caught at a lie? Dr. Dr., Yale, Lobster Boat? -- Starbuck .... Civilization is fun! Anyway, it keeps me busy!! "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... PocoLoco wrote: On 21 Sep 2005 11:45:49 -0700, wrote: I will vote against this vitally important nomination. Win or lose on this vote, it is essential that we act on our deepest convictions. And I refuse to vote for a Supreme Court nominee who came before the Senate intent on demonstrating his ability to deftly deflect legitimate questions about his views, opinions and philosophy. Almost as ridiculous as one who would brag about owning a non-existent motorcycle, yes? John Herring, the Desmo Drooler. -- Debate Issue: Resolved, that the voters of the United States need a mechanism to remove an incompetent President from office. An alternative: write a letter to George W. Bush at the White House and ask him to resign immediately for the good of the country and its people. |
Who is this Kevin guy and why does Mr. Noble keep responding to his
questions? Ohhhhh, it might be because they share the same email -- Starbuck .... Gardeners do it in bed. This signature was made by SigChanger. You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/ wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: OK Kevin, who said this?: =========================== Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't have a boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was awfully interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one, posting pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who really don't have one! ============================ Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here about their boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do not own one. I wonder who said that? Hmmm. I'm not Kevin, dimwit. |
wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... I will vote against this vitally important nomination. Win or lose on this vote, it is essential that we act on our deepest convictions. And I refuse to vote for a Supreme Court nominee who came before the Senate intent on demonstrating his ability to deftly deflect legitimate questions about his views, opinions and philosophy. Harry Krause? Kevin of Georgia? No one pays any attention to you, because you're almost always WRONG. Hey, remember that 35hp Wankel snowmobile you claimed would go 75mph??!!! They made my snowmobile. And how fast did your Desmo go? |
"Bill McKee" wrote in message ink.net... No one pays any attention to you, because you're almost always WRONG. Hey, remember that 35hp Wankel snowmobile you claimed would go 75mph??!!! They made my snowmobile. And how fast did your Desmo go? I don't know about your 35 hp Wankel snowmobile and the 75 MPH, but, I do know about my neighbor's Skiroule with a twin Sachs Wankel engine that would go faster than that! Back in the late 60's or very early 70's, I owned a very fast Skidoo. I thought it was the fastest snowmobile around until my neighbor's new Skiroule, with it's ice pick studded track came out onto the frozen lake and made my machine look like it was standing still when I was traveling at over 65 MPH. I am not sure of the HP of the Skiroule, but, if I remember correctly it was around the 35 or 40 HP. That Skiroule was FAST!!!! Jim |
Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Bill McKee wrote: wrote in message oups.com... I will vote against this vitally important nomination. Win or lose on this vote, it is essential that we act on our deepest convictions. And I refuse to vote for a Supreme Court nominee who came before the Senate intent on demonstrating his ability to deftly deflect legitimate questions about his views, opinions and philosophy. Harry Krause? Kevin of Georgia? No one pays any attention to you, because you're almost always WRONG. Hey, remember that 35hp Wankel snowmobile you claimed would go 75mph??!!! They made my snowmobile. And how fast did your Desmo go? They made an Evinrude snowmobile powered by a 35hp Wankel that went 75mph? Have ANY evidence of that? Answer: NO, it was an out and out lie. |
Jim Carter wrote: "Bill McKee" wrote in message ink.net... No one pays any attention to you, because you're almost always WRONG. Hey, remember that 35hp Wankel snowmobile you claimed would go 75mph??!!! They made my snowmobile. And how fast did your Desmo go? I don't know about your 35 hp Wankel snowmobile and the 75 MPH, but, I do know about my neighbor's Skiroule with a twin Sachs Wankel engine that would go faster than that! But the Evinrudes were huge, heavy beasts, powered by a single rotor Wankel, and wouldn't get anywhere NEAR 75mph. I'd wager they'd never see 50. Hell, they even had reverse, because you couldn't pick the back end up to turn it around!!! Back in the late 60's or very early 70's, I owned a very fast Skidoo. I thought it was the fastest snowmobile around until my neighbor's new Skiroule, with it's ice pick studded track came out onto the frozen lake and made my machine look like it was standing still when I was traveling at over 65 MPH. I am not sure of the HP of the Skiroule, but, if I remember correctly it was around the 35 or 40 HP. That Skiroule was FAST!!!! My fastest snowmobile was a Boa-Ski, with a twin Hirth 440. One a lot of races at the local track with that one, and it BARELY hit 75! |
PocoLoco wrote: On 21 Sep 2005 11:45:49 -0700, wrote: I will vote against this vitally important nomination. Win or lose on this vote, it is essential that we act on our deepest convictions. And I refuse to vote for a Supreme Court nominee who came before the Senate intent on demonstrating his ability to deftly deflect legitimate questions about his views, opinions and philosophy. Almost as ridiculous as one who would brag about owning a non-existent motorcycle, yes? -- John H Who said it, John? Do you really think it's a ridiculous statement?? |
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: OK Kevin, who said this?: =========================== Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't have a boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was awfully interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one, posting pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who really don't have one! ============================ Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here about their boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do not own one. I wonder who said that? Hmmm. I'm not Kevin, dimwit. Then why did you reply to my post to Kevin? Because you are replying to ME, you dumb ****!!! Do you not see that? It would be exactly the same if I read one of your idiotic posts, hit the reply button, then said, hey, Harry, quit posting off topic. My god, you are stupid. |
wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: OK Kevin, who said this?: =========================== Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't have a boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was awfully interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one, posting pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who really don't have one! ============================ Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here about their boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do not own one. I wonder who said that? Hmmm. I'm not Kevin, dimwit. Then why did you reply to my post to Kevin? Because you are replying to ME, you dumb ****!!! Do you not see that? It would be exactly the same if I read one of your idiotic posts, hit the reply button, then said, hey, Harry, quit posting off topic. My god, you are stupid. Bassy, why are you continuing to reply to posts I direct to Kevin? Seeing that you reply to these posts and your email addy is , one would think you are indeed Kevin Noble. And what is it you constantly accuse others of? Oh yes, foul language and childish insults. My, my. |
Harry:
At various times the US has had a mechanism for removing incompetent presidents. Their names were John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald (I forget the third name). |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... You're way out of line here. Assassination is never an acceptable course of action for removing a government official in this country. I agree with you Harry, but, why is it that a lot of Americans think it is OK for hired assassins to kill the government officials of other countries and the CIA funds those efforts? Jim |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... ................snip............ We really need a legal mechanism that will allow the removal of an incompetent like Bush. Waiting four years isn't good enough. What you need then, is a Parliamentary Democracy like what we have in Canada. If our country's leader screws up, he is removed by a vote of "non confidence" It has been done in the past and most likely will be done in the future. It keeps the country's leader on his/her toes. Jim |
Harry Krause wrote:
Jim Carter wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... ...............snip............ We really need a legal mechanism that will allow the removal of an incompetent like Bush. Waiting four years isn't good enough. What you need then, is a Parliamentary Democracy like what we have in Canada. If our country's leader screws up, he is removed by a vote of "non confidence" It has been done in the past and most likely will be done in the future. It keeps the country's leader on his/her toes. Jim Yes, I have stated before I am a fan of the British parliamentary system, which is used by many of the world's serious democracies. Trouble is...if the governing party has a majority they can run roughshod over us for up to 5 years. (eg Mulroney) |
"*JimH*" wrote in message ... wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: OK Kevin, who said this?: =========================== Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't have a boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was awfully interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one, posting pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who really don't have one! ============================ Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here about their boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do not own one. I wonder who said that? Hmmm. I'm not Kevin, dimwit. Then why did you reply to my post to Kevin? Because he is the "King" |
|
|
On 22 Sep 2005 05:56:54 -0700, wrote:
PocoLoco wrote: On 21 Sep 2005 11:45:49 -0700, wrote: I will vote against this vitally important nomination. Win or lose on this vote, it is essential that we act on our deepest convictions. And I refuse to vote for a Supreme Court nominee who came before the Senate intent on demonstrating his ability to deftly deflect legitimate questions about his views, opinions and philosophy. Almost as ridiculous as one who would brag about owning a non-existent motorcycle, yes? -- John H Who said it, John? Do you really think it's a ridiculous statement?? *You* said you owned a Moto Guzzi 'Desmo', and yes, it was a ridiculous statement. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: OK Kevin, who said this?: =========================== Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't have a boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was awfully interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one, posting pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who really don't have one! ============================ Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here about their boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do not own one. I wonder who said that? Hmmm. I'm not Kevin, dimwit. Then why did you reply to my post to Kevin? Because you are replying to ME, you dumb ****!!! Do you not see that? It would be exactly the same if I read one of your idiotic posts, hit the reply button, then said, hey, Harry, quit posting off topic. My god, you are stupid. Bassy, why are you continuing to reply to posts I direct to Kevin? Seeing that you reply to these posts and your email addy is , one would think you are indeed Kevin Noble. Try again, idiot, you are wrong. As usual. If you were posting something "direct to Kevin", why would you do it in a form of a reply to ME, asshole? By the way, above, I was replying to a post by you. In that reply, I called you "dumb ****", see it up there? Well, you replied, and by your idiotic way of thinking, one could say that your name IS "dumb ****", correct? |
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: OK Kevin, who said this?: =========================== Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't have a boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was awfully interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one, posting pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who really don't have one! ============================ Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here about their boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do not own one. I wonder who said that? Hmmm. I'm not Kevin, dimwit. Then why did you reply to my post to Kevin? Because you are replying to ME, you dumb ****!!! Do you not see that? It would be exactly the same if I read one of your idiotic posts, hit the reply button, then said, hey, Harry, quit posting off topic. My god, you are stupid. Bassy, why are you continuing to reply to posts I direct to Kevin? Seeing that you reply to these posts and your email addy is , one would think you are indeed Kevin Noble. And what is it you constantly accuse others of? Oh yes, foul language and childish insults. Difference is, dumb ass, I never said I'd stop. YOU did, liar. My, my. Your what? |
wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: OK Kevin, who said this?: =========================== Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't have a boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was awfully interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one, posting pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who really don't have one! ============================ Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here about their boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do not own one. I wonder who said that? Hmmm. I'm not Kevin, dimwit. Then why did you reply to my post to Kevin? Because you are replying to ME, you dumb ****!!! Do you not see that? It would be exactly the same if I read one of your idiotic posts, hit the reply button, then said, hey, Harry, quit posting off topic. My god, you are stupid. Bassy, why are you continuing to reply to posts I direct to Kevin? Seeing that you reply to these posts and your email addy is , one would think you are indeed Kevin Noble. Try again, idiot, you are wrong. As usual. If you were posting something "direct to Kevin", why would you do it in a form of a reply to ME, asshole? By the way, above, I was replying to a post by you. In that reply, I called you "dumb ****", see it up there? Well, you replied, and by your idiotic way of thinking, one could say that your name IS "dumb ****", correct? Potty mouth. So how about telling us about your boat Kevin? I cannot recall you ever posting anything on topic, so maybe me asking you about your boat (if you have one) can be a first step for you. |
wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: OK Kevin, who said this?: =========================== Oh, yeah, if you notice, he didn't use that tripe when he didn't have a boat. One can only wonder if he really does now. Seems like he was awfully interested in letting everyone know that he was looking at one, posting pictures, asking questions, etc. Usually those are the ones who really don't have one! ============================ Yep, someone actually inferred that those asking questions here about their boat and posting pictures here of their boat usually means they do not own one. I wonder who said that? Hmmm. I'm not Kevin, dimwit. Then why did you reply to my post to Kevin? Because you are replying to ME, you dumb ****!!! Do you not see that? It would be exactly the same if I read one of your idiotic posts, hit the reply button, then said, hey, Harry, quit posting off topic. My god, you are stupid. Bassy, why are you continuing to reply to posts I direct to Kevin? Seeing that you reply to these posts and your email addy is , one would think you are indeed Kevin Noble. And what is it you constantly accuse others of? Oh yes, foul language and childish insults. Difference is, dumb ass, I never said I'd stop. YOU did, liar. Yes, I did a long time ago. And yes, you never did stop. |
wrote in message oups.com... Jim Carter wrote: "Bill McKee" wrote in message ink.net... No one pays any attention to you, because you're almost always WRONG. Hey, remember that 35hp Wankel snowmobile you claimed would go 75mph??!!! They made my snowmobile. And how fast did your Desmo go? I don't know about your 35 hp Wankel snowmobile and the 75 MPH, but, I do know about my neighbor's Skiroule with a twin Sachs Wankel engine that would go faster than that! But the Evinrudes were huge, heavy beasts, powered by a single rotor Wankel, and wouldn't get anywhere NEAR 75mph. I'd wager they'd never see 50. Hell, they even had reverse, because you couldn't pick the back end up to turn it around!!! Back in the late 60's or very early 70's, I owned a very fast Skidoo. I thought it was the fastest snowmobile around until my neighbor's new Skiroule, with it's ice pick studded track came out onto the frozen lake and made my machine look like it was standing still when I was traveling at over 65 MPH. I am not sure of the HP of the Skiroule, but, if I remember correctly it was around the 35 or 40 HP. That Skiroule was FAST!!!! My fastest snowmobile was a Boa-Ski, with a twin Hirth 440. One a lot of races at the local track with that one, and it BARELY hit 75! Bwaaaahaaaaa. As to reverse, was a easy addition to the tranny. Was using it one day, and a couple was near on their sled. The lady said, I really would like that feature. And a single rotor Wankle had lots of power. As to being cold, we do not see the really cold the midwest and east coast sees. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com