I am not running a older OMC Johnson it's a newer Suzuki 25. it may sit in
the water just right with this motor, the pitch of the prop may be just
right, and possibly the lake was too calm when I ran the test, all I know is
it just ran great and better than I expected.I'm sorry you guys don't
believe me.
"Del Cecchi" wrote in message
...

"HankCoen" wrote in message
...
Planet earth Tom. I just came back from Greenwood lake and used the
speedo I
ran 32mph across the lake. It's possible the Lund cuts water better
once
it's up on plane than what you are used to. Sorry you don't agree.
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:56:28 GMT, "HankCoen"
wrote:

Listen bud don't let the speed deamons scare you. I have an 18ft lund
explorer and it's probably heavier than your bayrunner. it has a 25
and a
9.9 on it. The 25 runs that rig at about 30-35 mph depending on
conditions
and the 9.9 will push it to around 20 it's because of the prop on the
newer
engines that you get these results.

You have a 18ft Lund Explorer that has a 25 hp engine and it will do
30/35 mph along with a 9.9 that will push it to 20 mph.

What planet did you say you live on?

My friend had, up until this year, a 35 johnson from 1980, the same model
that is now a 25. It would do 24 mph wide open, by GPS. Perhaps yours
is a lot faster, or perhaps you need a new speedometer.

del cecchi

"HankCoen" wrote in message
...
Guys, Guys. we are all in this together. First off my Lund is a 97
model and
is not as wide or as heavy as the newer ones. and it is only rated for
a 40
tiller not the 150 you said.. I may possibly need a new speedo but not
because of this issue. I guess you guys that are questioning me are
probably
made about my crack about being a real fisherman and not being
interested in
speed just catch. Sorry if that bothered you it's just my opinion. And
lets
try helping eachother instead of slinging hash. OK
"louis" wrote in message
oups.com...
That's what I heard from his wife and kid. I heard he's always
catching fishing and loved the waters. Hopefully, the current setup
will push me plus one atleast 15 mph. I'll know this weekend.

HankCoen wrote:
Listen bud don't let the speed deamons scare you. I have an 18ft
lund
explorer and it's probably heavier than your bayrunner. it has a 25
and
a
9.9 on it. The 25 runs that rig at about 30-35 mph depending on
conditions
and the 9.9 will push it to around 20 it's because of the prop on
the
newer
engines that you get these results. Your 15 on that boat should do
just
fine. It all depends on how fast you need to get where you are going
that is
the real story here. The guy you bought from like me was probably a
true
fisherman, and not someone who had to get to the other side of the
lake
first. Relax and enjoy the 15.
"louis" wrote in message
oups.com...
I picked up a used 18' Bayrunner (aluminum boat) from a kind lady
that
her husband owned. He passed away. He placed a 15 hp outboard
and
from the size of the boat it seems a bit small.

His son told me that with him and his dad they can cruise at 15-20
mph
and cut through wind with no problem so his dad never thought
about
placing a larger motor.

If I'm in choppy water (1'-2') would this motor be large enough
for me
and a friend to ride in? It can get windy where I'm at. I'm not
looking for a speed boat but I don't want to be underpowered for
safety
reasons.

Any experience would be appreciated.



I don't know about the rest, but I'm not mad. It is just that my
experience and my friend's experience contradicts your claims. Who am I
going to believe, you or my lying eyes? And my buddies 16 foot lund is a
1979 or 80 model. Another buddy has a Alumacraft "backtroller" with a
merc 50 and it goes in the low 30's.

So why should I believe you and not my lying eyes?

del

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:23:56 GMT, "HankCoen"
wrote:


I am not running a older OMC Johnson it's a newer Suzuki 25. it may sit in
the water just right with this motor, the pitch of the prop may be just
right, and possibly the lake was too calm when I ran the test, all I know is
it just ran great and better than I expected.I'm sorry you guys don't
believe me.


Like I said, I'll take you at your word.

But...

I have a 14 foot Princecraft Yukon with a 2005 Johnson carbed two
stroke with a non-standard prop. With me, 150 pounds of gear, a
transom mount transducer and stern mounted trolling motor, I can just
barely turn 25 mph. That's with a strong tail wind.

So there you go.






There's also the fact that speedometers tend to be inaccurate.
Check your speed with a GPS unit and you will probably find that
it's not quite 32 mph. If so, that's not lying, that's an
inaccurate speedometer.

I know when I took my eighteen year old grandson out for the
first time he said, "We've got to be going 40, at least." The
GPS said 20.

-Raf

--
Misifus-
Rafael Seibert

http://www.ralphandsue.com

this is getting funny now. I don't know who you should believe either. but
the next time I get a chance I will try to get radar clocked if I can. Also
somewhere there is a major power to weight ratio drop. if his 50 does low
30's and it is probably 50 lbs heavier than mine and possibly his motor
shaft is not as deep down as the Suzuki this thing looks at least 3" longer
than my 9.9 long shaft. that gives you better plane and the prop pitch is
different anything is possible. Happy fishing guy whatever the reason is it
really makes no difference when you come right down to it. I just hope the
guy that started this is happy with his new boat. I'm getting tired of
typing.
"Del Cecchi" wrote in message
...

"HankCoen" wrote in message
...
Guys, Guys. we are all in this together. First off my Lund is a 97
model and
is not as wide or as heavy as the newer ones. and it is only rated for
a 40
tiller not the 150 you said.. I may possibly need a new speedo but not
because of this issue. I guess you guys that are questioning me are
probably
made about my crack about being a real fisherman and not being
interested in
speed just catch. Sorry if that bothered you it's just my opinion. And
lets
try helping eachother instead of slinging hash. OK
"louis" wrote in message
oups.com...
That's what I heard from his wife and kid. I heard he's always
catching fishing and loved the waters. Hopefully, the current setup
will push me plus one atleast 15 mph. I'll know this weekend.

HankCoen wrote:
Listen bud don't let the speed deamons scare you. I have an 18ft
lund
explorer and it's probably heavier than your bayrunner. it has a 25
and
a
9.9 on it. The 25 runs that rig at about 30-35 mph depending on
conditions
and the 9.9 will push it to around 20 it's because of the prop on
the
newer
engines that you get these results. Your 15 on that boat should do
just
fine. It all depends on how fast you need to get where you are going
that is
the real story here. The guy you bought from like me was probably a
true
fisherman, and not someone who had to get to the other side of the
lake
first. Relax and enjoy the 15.
"louis" wrote in message
oups.com...
I picked up a used 18' Bayrunner (aluminum boat) from a kind lady
that
her husband owned. He passed away. He placed a 15 hp outboard
and
from the size of the boat it seems a bit small.

His son told me that with him and his dad they can cruise at 15-20
mph
and cut through wind with no problem so his dad never thought
about
placing a larger motor.

If I'm in choppy water (1'-2') would this motor be large enough
for me
and a friend to ride in? It can get windy where I'm at. I'm not
looking for a speed boat but I don't want to be underpowered for
safety
reasons.

Any experience would be appreciated.



I don't know about the rest, but I'm not mad. It is just that my
experience and my friend's experience contradicts your claims. Who am I
going to believe, you or my lying eyes? And my buddies 16 foot lund is a
1979 or 80 model. Another buddy has a Alumacraft "backtroller" with a
merc 50 and it goes in the low 30's.

So why should I believe you and not my lying eyes?

del

Let me add this to this discussion that's gone off track.

The shape of the hull will make all the difference. A flat bottom dory
will get a much higher speed than a deep v hull. Just look at C-Dorys
and their HP requirements and compare the same to a deep v power boat.

I haven't had the chance to take the boat out for a spin yet. Go
figure. It's been over a week now since I purchased it. The Bayrunner
looks to flatten out quite a bit in the stern and since aluminum is
much lighter than fiberglass or wood I would expect mine to go atleast
15 MPH.

Now consider a 3,500 lbs sailboat with a full lead keel being pushed
around the water with a 9.9 hp at 6 knots. I don't find it that
difficult to believe that the other fellow is getting close to 20 mph
on his aluminum boat that weight probably a 1/3 of the weight.

I'm really itching to take her out for a spin and I do hope this great
weather that we're having in the SF Bay will hold up throught the
weekend.


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:19:09 GMT, "HankCoen"
wrote:

this is getting funny now. I don't know who you should believe either. but
the next time I get a chance I will try to get radar clocked if I can.

Borrow a GPS from somebody - that will give you a pretty accurate
reading.

Also
somewhere there is a major power to weight ratio drop. if his 50 does low
30's and it is probably 50 lbs heavier than mine and possibly his motor
shaft is not as deep down as the Suzuki this thing looks at least 3" longer
than my 9.9 long shaft. that gives you better plane and the prop pitch is
different anything is possible.

That's true enough, but the 9.9 claim seems a little, well, odd for
the same reason - power/weight ratio.

Try the GPS thing - that the easiest way to determine speed and
compare it to your speedo.

I wish I had a GPS!

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On 30 Aug 2005 14:07:23 -0700, "louis" wrote:

Let me add this to this discussion that's gone off track.

The shape of the hull will make all the difference. A flat bottom dory
will get a much higher speed than a deep v hull. Just look at C-Dorys
and their HP requirements and compare the same to a deep v power boat.

I haven't had the chance to take the boat out for a spin yet. Go
figure. It's been over a week now since I purchased it. The Bayrunner
looks to flatten out quite a bit in the stern and since aluminum is
much lighter than fiberglass or wood I would expect mine to go atleast
15 MPH.

Now consider a 3,500 lbs sailboat with a full lead keel being pushed
around the water with a 9.9 hp at 6 knots. I don't find it that
difficult to believe that the other fellow is getting close to 20 mph
on his aluminum boat that weight probably a 1/3 of the weight.

I'm really itching to take her out for a spin and I do hope this great
weather that we're having in the SF Bay will hold up throught the
weekend.

Enjoy - use your GPS, then go catch a sturgeon. :)

louis wrote:

I wish I had a GPS!

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:

On 30 Aug 2005 14:07:23 -0700, "louis" wrote:


Let me add this to this discussion that's gone off track.

The shape of the hull will make all the difference. A flat bottom dory
will get a much higher speed than a deep v hull. Just look at C-Dorys
and their HP requirements and compare the same to a deep v power boat.

I haven't had the chance to take the boat out for a spin yet. Go
figure. It's been over a week now since I purchased it. The Bayrunner
looks to flatten out quite a bit in the stern and since aluminum is
much lighter than fiberglass or wood I would expect mine to go atleast
15 MPH.

Now consider a 3,500 lbs sailboat with a full lead keel being pushed
around the water with a 9.9 hp at 6 knots. I don't find it that
difficult to believe that the other fellow is getting close to 20 mph
on his aluminum boat that weight probably a 1/3 of the weight.

I'm really itching to take her out for a spin and I do hope this great
weather that we're having in the SF Bay will hold up throught the
weekend.

Enjoy - use your GPS, then go catch a sturgeon. :)




My brother gave me one for Christmas a couple of years ago. I
think it cost him less than $100.

-Raf

--
Misifus-
Rafael Seibert

http://www.ralphandsue.com

Around 8/30/2005 3:36 PM, louis wrote:

I wish I had a GPS!

Here you go:
http://www.superpawn.com/product.asp...t_id=2040 890

--
~/Garth - 1966 Glastron V-142 Skiflite: "Blue-Boat"
"There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing
as simply messing about in boats."
-Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows

Finally took her own. It was 92 degrees in the SF bay...unusually hot
for this part of the country.

Just like the owner's son told me it does about 20. I would say more
like 17-18. I noticed that the tilt pin was on the lowest position so
I moved it two notches up. I also noticed that the outboard was
running rich (thick smoke) so I adjusted the mixture. With these two
changes there was a noticable pick up in overall speed.

I guess if one uses it in a small lake the outboard is ok but out in
the bay there's lot of water to cover. My boston whaler with a 40
really flew and it's a bit of an adjustment to this. And the noise.
Wow, that little beast sure screams. I'm definitly going to change it
to a 30+ hp. On the plus side I motored and trolled for 7 hours and it
only burned 4 gallons. It's a great clean smooth outboard.

And I got skunked. No bite.

Garth Almgren wrote:
Around 8/30/2005 3:36 PM, louis wrote:

I wish I had a GPS!

Here you go:
http://www.superpawn.com/product.asp...t_id=2040 890

--
~/Garth - 1966 Glastron V-142 Skiflite: "Blue-Boat"
"There is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing
as simply messing about in boats."
-Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows