Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Sobieski wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, "Bryan" wrote: I have a couple of man-made lakes nearby. They were natural canyons until they were dammed. Consequently the lake is filled with submerged trees and rocks. I'm wondering how useful a fish-finder would be to visualize below the surface in order to avoid submerged trees including dropping an anchor into a tree instead of mud. I'd rather not buy a new anchor and rode everytime I drop the hook in some quiet water. Has my imagination created a problem that doesn't exist and tree filled reservoirs aren't really anchor-thiefs? Thanks Bryan If they are US Army Corp of Engineers flood control projects, they clean out the trees before they let the reservoir fill. For us fisherman, that is bad. I have boated on flood control lakes for over 30 years and never lost an anchor. Finding the fish was the toughest part. An old saying, 90% of the fish live in 10% of the lake. Yes, a fishfinder can find trees, but you only need 1 to hang up on. Pretty hard to notice that single tree that got washed out in a flood and now sits water logged at the bottom. If you are really worried, don't use that nice expensive Fortress. If it isn't windy cove you anchor in, just tie on a coffee can full of cement or a concrete block ![]() Beat wishes! Regards, SOB Lake Hartwell on the SC/GA border is a Army corps lake, they left trees in some areas and have then marked with hazzard markers. On maps they are "Fish attractor" areas. Capt Jack R. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Mercury in fish | General |