![]() |
|
Tree-filled Reservoirs and Fish Finders
I have a couple of man-made lakes nearby. They were natural canyons until
they were dammed. Consequently the lake is filled with submerged trees and rocks. I'm wondering how useful a fish-finder would be to visualize below the surface in order to avoid submerged trees including dropping an anchor into a tree instead of mud. I'd rather not buy a new anchor and rode everytime I drop the hook in some quiet water. Has my imagination created a problem that doesn't exist and tree filled reservoirs aren't really anchor-thiefs? Thanks Bryan |
Thanks. Now you have ME worried, since I'll be fishing in such a lake in 3
weeks. It's not like I didn't have enough to think about, ya know? Fish finders are fascinating because of their ability to *sometimes* find fish, and to remind you that no matter how much technocrap you put on your boat, fishing is still very much a random thing. There are places where fish will park 9 times out of 10, but sometimes....not, and who the hell knows why? Other times, the device does nothing but let you see all the fish that you cannot catch on a certain day. Frustrating, until you remember that your main purpose in being there is not to catch fish, but to have a beer and try to convince your significant other to remove her clothes. "Bryan" wrote in message .. . I have a couple of man-made lakes nearby. They were natural canyons until they were dammed. Consequently the lake is filled with submerged trees and rocks. I'm wondering how useful a fish-finder would be to visualize below the surface in order to avoid submerged trees including dropping an anchor into a tree instead of mud. I'd rather not buy a new anchor and rode everytime I drop the hook in some quiet water. Has my imagination created a problem that doesn't exist and tree filled reservoirs aren't really anchor-thiefs? Thanks Bryan |
"Bryan" wrote in message .. . I have a couple of man-made lakes nearby. They were natural canyons until they were dammed. Consequently the lake is filled with submerged trees and rocks. I'm wondering how useful a fish-finder would be to visualize below the surface in order to avoid submerged trees including dropping an anchor into a tree instead of mud. I'd rather not buy a new anchor and rode everytime I drop the hook in some quiet water. Has my imagination created a problem that doesn't exist and tree filled reservoirs aren't really anchor-thiefs? Thanks Bryan It really depends on your fish finder and how good you are at reading it..... Finding fish can be tricky, but finding structure is not all that difficult. You can find drop offs, points and rock piles. I have an older Humingbird and you can generally tell what type of bottom is down there and if there are big trees. A buddy of mine has an older more expensive brand and he can read his even better, but it looks like junk to me. It takes practice. The lake I boat on is a flood control lake so the water level fluctuates. When the water starts to get low I will not go on the lake without a fish finder. |
"Bryan" wrote in message
.. . I have a couple of man-made lakes nearby. They were natural canyons until they were dammed. Consequently the lake is filled with submerged trees and rocks. I'm wondering how useful a fish-finder would be to visualize below the surface in order to avoid submerged trees including dropping an anchor into a tree instead of mud. I'd rather not buy a new anchor and rode everytime I drop the hook in some quiet water. Has my imagination created a problem that doesn't exist and tree filled reservoirs aren't really anchor-thiefs? Thanks Bryan "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Thanks. Now you have ME worried, since I'll be fishing in such a lake in 3 weeks. It's not like I didn't have enough to think about, ya know? Fish finders are fascinating because of their ability to *sometimes* find fish, and to remind you that no matter how much technocrap you put on your boat, fishing is still very much a random thing. There are places where fish will park 9 times out of 10, but sometimes....not, and who the hell knows why? Other times, the device does nothing but let you see all the fish that you cannot catch on a certain day. Frustrating, until you remember that your main purpose in being there is not to catch fish, but to have a beer and try to convince your significant other to remove her clothes. Now that's fishing! |
"Gorf" wrote in message om... "Bryan" wrote in message .. . I have a couple of man-made lakes nearby. They were natural canyons until they were dammed. Consequently the lake is filled with submerged trees and rocks. I'm wondering how useful a fish-finder would be to visualize below the surface in order to avoid submerged trees including dropping an anchor into a tree instead of mud. I'd rather not buy a new anchor and rode everytime I drop the hook in some quiet water. Has my imagination created a problem that doesn't exist and tree filled reservoirs aren't really anchor-thiefs? Thanks Bryan It really depends on your fish finder and how good you are at reading it..... Finding fish can be tricky, but finding structure is not all that difficult. You can find drop offs, points and rock piles. I have an older Humingbird and you can generally tell what type of bottom is down there and if there are big trees. A buddy of mine has an older more expensive brand and he can read his even better, but it looks like junk to me. It takes practice. The lake I boat on is a flood control lake so the water level fluctuates. When the water starts to get low I will not go on the lake without a fish finder. Trees are my biggest concern. So I'll be trying to find an affordable fish-finder that offers great structure identification right down to small trees and large rocks. My local boat dealer says their most popular model is the Lowrance x47 and x47ex. Any comments on their qualities for my tree-filled reservoir concerns? |
"Bryan" wrote in message ... "Bryan" wrote in message .. . I have a couple of man-made lakes nearby. They were natural canyons until they were dammed. Consequently the lake is filled with submerged trees and rocks. I'm wondering how useful a fish-finder would be to visualize below the surface in order to avoid submerged trees including dropping an anchor into a tree instead of mud. I'd rather not buy a new anchor and rode everytime I drop the hook in some quiet water. Has my imagination created a problem that doesn't exist and tree filled reservoirs aren't really anchor-thiefs? Thanks Bryan "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... Thanks. Now you have ME worried, since I'll be fishing in such a lake in 3 weeks. It's not like I didn't have enough to think about, ya know? Fish finders are fascinating because of their ability to *sometimes* find fish, and to remind you that no matter how much technocrap you put on your boat, fishing is still very much a random thing. There are places where fish will park 9 times out of 10, but sometimes....not, and who the hell knows why? Other times, the device does nothing but let you see all the fish that you cannot catch on a certain day. Frustrating, until you remember that your main purpose in being there is not to catch fish, but to have a beer and try to convince your significant other to remove her clothes. Now that's fishing! I'm telling ya....it really is. :-) |
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:10:38 GMT, "Bryan" wrote:
I have a couple of man-made lakes nearby. They were natural canyons until they were dammed. Consequently the lake is filled with submerged trees and rocks. I'm wondering how useful a fish-finder would be to visualize below the surface in order to avoid submerged trees including dropping an anchor into a tree instead of mud. I'd rather not buy a new anchor and rode everytime I drop the hook in some quiet water. Has my imagination created a problem that doesn't exist and tree filled reservoirs aren't really anchor-thiefs? Thanks Bryan I used a mushroom anchor in that environment. Never lost one. -- John H. On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD |
"John Sobieski" ] wrote in message ... On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, "Bryan" wrote: I have a couple of man-made lakes nearby. They were natural canyons until they were dammed. Consequently the lake is filled with submerged trees and rocks. I'm wondering how useful a fish-finder would be to visualize below the surface in order to avoid submerged trees including dropping an anchor into a tree instead of mud. I'd rather not buy a new anchor and rode everytime I drop the hook in some quiet water. Has my imagination created a problem that doesn't exist and tree filled reservoirs aren't really anchor-thiefs? Thanks Bryan If they are US Army Corp of Engineers flood control projects, they clean out the trees before they let the reservoir fill. For us fisherman, that is bad. I have boated on flood control lakes for over 30 years and never lost an anchor. Finding the fish was the toughest part. An old saying, 90% of the fish live in 10% of the lake. Yes, a fishfinder can find trees, but you only need 1 to hang up on. Pretty hard to notice that single tree that got washed out in a flood and now sits water logged at the bottom. If you are really worried, don't use that nice expensive Fortress. If it isn't windy cove you anchor in, just tie on a coffee can full of cement or a concrete block :) My uncles used those for anchors for years. Beat wishes! Regards, SOB I don't know if the lakes/reservoirs are flood control or domestic water sources; I'll have to check it out for the sake curiosity. The two I have in mind are USACE projects. The nearest lake is full of submerged near-shore trees and the coves seem to full of submerged trees. I'm new to this kind of boating so I'm learning stuff every time I go out and getting more comfortable with everything about the boat. The last time out I just used a dock line and tied the boat to a piece of tree sticking out of the water in a cove I tucked into. A coffee can filled with cement will hold my boat in place? Thanks Bryan Sea Ray 185 |
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:10:38 GMT, "Bryan" wrote: I have a couple of man-made lakes nearby. They were natural canyons until they were dammed. Consequently the lake is filled with submerged trees and rocks. Lake of the Damned. Don't go near the water!!!! MMMUUAAAWWWAAAHHHHHAAAAA!!!!! I'm wondering how useful a fish-finder would be to visualize below the surface in order to avoid submerged trees including dropping an anchor into a tree instead of mud. I'd rather not buy a new anchor and rode everytime I drop the hook in some quiet water. Has my imagination created a problem that doesn't exist and tree filled reservoirs aren't really anchor-thiefs? I guess I'd have to ask why you need to anchor in a structure field. The whole point of having a structure field is to be able to move around. -- Later, Tom What's a structure field? The places I want to anchor are small quiet coves great for picnicking with the kids, but they are full of trees. |
"PocoLoco" wrote in message ... On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:10:38 GMT, "Bryan" wrote: I have a couple of man-made lakes nearby. They were natural canyons until they were dammed. Consequently the lake is filled with submerged trees and rocks. I'm wondering how useful a fish-finder would be to visualize below the surface in order to avoid submerged trees including dropping an anchor into a tree instead of mud. I'd rather not buy a new anchor and rode everytime I drop the hook in some quiet water. Has my imagination created a problem that doesn't exist and tree filled reservoirs aren't really anchor-thiefs? Thanks Bryan I used a mushroom anchor in that environment. Never lost one. -- John H. On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD That seems like a good idea. Thanks. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:42 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com