Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks. Now you have ME worried, since I'll be fishing in such a lake in 3
weeks. It's not like I didn't have enough to think about, ya know? Fish finders are fascinating because of their ability to *sometimes* find fish, and to remind you that no matter how much technocrap you put on your boat, fishing is still very much a random thing. There are places where fish will park 9 times out of 10, but sometimes....not, and who the hell knows why? Other times, the device does nothing but let you see all the fish that you cannot catch on a certain day. Frustrating, until you remember that your main purpose in being there is not to catch fish, but to have a beer and try to convince your significant other to remove her clothes. "Bryan" wrote in message .. . I have a couple of man-made lakes nearby. They were natural canyons until they were dammed. Consequently the lake is filled with submerged trees and rocks. I'm wondering how useful a fish-finder would be to visualize below the surface in order to avoid submerged trees including dropping an anchor into a tree instead of mud. I'd rather not buy a new anchor and rode everytime I drop the hook in some quiet water. Has my imagination created a problem that doesn't exist and tree filled reservoirs aren't really anchor-thiefs? Thanks Bryan |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Mercury in fish | General |