Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message

Bush should resign.
LOL. Yeah, whatever.
Yeah, we'll be in terrific shape when Bush's term ends. We should wait
until then for the Bush cancer to remove itself from our body politic.
Harry,

There's a lot of interesting stuff that's about to be released in the
next several weeks that will turn the entire 9/11 Commission Report
completely on its ear.

This "Able Danger" story is growing legs, and even the news media is
starting to ask questions again as to why so many important items were
left out the 9/11 report.

When you tie in the "Able Danger" story with the Sandy Berger
sentencing, and the just-released-to-Congress report from Goss on CIA
intel failures, the airwaves will be flooded with news about an
enormous coverup headed by the likes of Berger, ben Veniste, and Jamie
Gorelick.

Nobody will care about Chavez, or Plamegate, or Bush's poll numbers,
or...




Yout boy Bush is an utter failure as a president. Trying to shift the
blame to the Clinton Administration is beyond old.


Shifting the blame isn't the intent of rehashing the issue.

"It's not the crime. It's the coverup"

I'm willing to let the cards fall as they may. If Bush administration
officials were involved in covering up intelligence failures, then they
should burn. If Clinton officials and Dems like ben Veniste and Gorelick
were involved, then they should burn.



The Bush Administration has been involved in one disaster after another,
and to date about all you have done is rationalize those failures and
attempt to pin them on the previous administration.


Clinton officials spent 7 years in office trying to make it appear as if
terrorist attacks within our borders were not state-sponsored.

There were coverups after the '93 WTC bombing, the '95 OKC bombing, the '96
downing of TWA800, and the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole.

FOI Act lawsuits surrounding those events are running into continuous
stone-walling from the FBI, DoD, NTSB, CIA, and State Departments.

Goss is purging the dead wood from the intel agencies, and the new folks
won't be so eager to cover the rear ends of their predecessors.

Lt. Shaffer is the first example of the new atmosphere emerging among the
intel community.



  #2   Report Post  
Chris
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

Clinton officials spent 7 years in office trying to make it appear as if
terrorist attacks within our borders were not state-sponsored.


If this is the case, why has it taken so long to figure it out, and release
the information? It seems suspiciously "timely".

FOI Act lawsuits surrounding those events are running into continuous
stone-walling from the FBI, DoD, NTSB, CIA, and State Departments.


You mean a potential defendant's agents and organizations moving to block a
lawsuit that could be damaging to their parent agency? Wow. That's just
unheard of.

Goss is purging the dead wood from the intel agencies, and the new folks
won't be so eager to cover the rear ends of their predecessors.


I have never seen anyone with the loyalty to cover the incompetent or
directly criminal intentions of previous employees, especially when there's
no need. It's not in their best interest, should that person's job become
up for grabs.

I find it unlikely that Bush was not knowledgeable of any or all of these
events, and as you've stated in effect, coverups can be as important as the
crimes themselves.

So why shouldn't Bush resign?

He's either incompetent, with an incompetent or misleading staff, and should
be removed, or he's a deliberately criminal man, who has assisted the
coverup already in effect.

Either way, his approval rating is low, his ethics are sad and fully
questionable, and he has lost any touch he may have ever had with the common
citizen. He is not for the people, of the people, and by the people.

Personally, I think any President, or candidate, that even mentions
something to the effect of "vote for me, or there will be an attack on the
country" (which he did during his last campaign for re-election) should be
tried, and executed for treason.

He's a liar, and a traitor.



  #3   Report Post  
NOYB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chris" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

Clinton officials spent 7 years in office trying to make it appear as if
terrorist attacks within our borders were not state-sponsored.


If this is the case, why has it taken so long to figure it out, and
release
the information?



Because Goss just took the reigns a couple of months ago.



  #4   Report Post  
Chris
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Chris" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

Clinton officials spent 7 years in office trying to make it appear as

if
terrorist attacks within our borders were not state-sponsored.


If this is the case, why has it taken so long to figure it out, and
release
the information?



Because Goss just took the reigns a couple of months ago.


And who has been the President up until, as well as beyond that time?


  #5   Report Post  
Bert Robbins
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chris" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Chris" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

Clinton officials spent 7 years in office trying to make it appear as

if
terrorist attacks within our borders were not state-sponsored.

If this is the case, why has it taken so long to figure it out, and
release
the information?



Because Goss just took the reigns a couple of months ago.


And who has been the President up until, as well as beyond that time?


Have you ever worked in a beauracracy? I didn't think so!




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Get yourself some cheap sunglasses? (Oh yeah!) *JimH* General 45 July 21st 05 05:48 PM
FS: some cheap boats in Ontario, Canada news Marketplace 0 July 5th 04 02:03 PM
DAMMIT ICOM WHY SO CHEAP?!! Larry Cruising 18 September 14th 03 11:42 PM
DAMMIT ICOM WHY SO CHEAP?!! Larry Electronics 23 September 14th 03 11:42 PM
WTB: cheap center console 17' or larger in New Jersey M.Katsoris Marketplace 0 August 3rd 03 06:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017