Even the local liberal radio station was making bad comments about Pelosi's
speech. Being a leader of the Democrat party, she should stick to facts.
Not impose her demagoguery in to a speech put up as fact. Leave the spin to
Harry and his types.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message


her words are putting American
lives at risk."

(Awwwwwwwww....)


I guess I wouldn't expect you to care about American lives. Afterall,
you've already stated that those soldiers are just a bunch of dummies
who
sodomize Iraqis with broomsticks. Who knows...maybe one of 'em will
look
you up when he returns from Iraq. If you're lucky maybe the sports
store in
your area won't have a sale on glowsticks about that time.





Your dumb as a post POTUS is putting American lives at risk, Nobby, here
and abroad. No one is dead because of Pelosi's expression of freedom of
speech; lots are dead because of Bush's policies.

Calif Bill wrote:
Even the local liberal radio station was making bad comments about Pelosi's
speech. Being a leader of the Democrat party, she should stick to facts.
Not impose her demagoguery in to a speech put up as fact. Leave the spin to
Harry and his types.


Bush is the leader of the Republican Party, so he should stick to facts,
too, right? Except that he lies about everything. You lost me on that
imposing "her demagoguery" curve, though. You don't object when the
Bush-****ters resort to it. But, then, you're a Democrat (in a pig's
eye), you say.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Calif Bill wrote:
Even the local liberal radio station was making bad comments about
Pelosi's
speech. Being a leader of the Democrat party, she should stick to
facts.
Not impose her demagoguery in to a speech put up as fact. Leave the
spin to
Harry and his types.


Bush is the leader of the Republican Party, so he should stick to facts,
too, right? Except that he lies about everything. You lost me on that
imposing "her demagoguery" curve, though. You don't object when the
Bush-****ters resort to it. But, then, you're a Democrat (in a pig's
eye), you say.

I am a Democrat. Harry S. type. Not a limousine liberal who whores for
whatever group is paying for spin.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message ink.net...
Even the local liberal radio station was making bad comments about Pelosi's
speech. Being a leader of the Democrat party, she should stick to facts.



fact is, bush launched into iraq to eliminate WMDs that has yet to be
found. not enough dems have called into question bush's competence,
if you ask me.

Marty Feldman wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message ink.net...

Even the local liberal radio station was making bad comments about Pelosi's
speech. Being a leader of the Democrat party, she should stick to facts.




fact is, bush launched into iraq to eliminate WMDs that has yet to be
found. not enough dems have called into question bush's competence,
if you ask me.



A discussion about whether Bush is competent to be POTUS is relevant
under any circumstances, and at any level. The POTUS is the most
important person in the world, and if, as now, a nincompoop holds the
job, we're in a world of ****. As we are now.

Pelosi performed a valuable public service by questioning Bush's
competency. Hopefully the question will reverberate on the Sunday
discussion shows, and make its way into the general media this coming
week, despite ongoing GOP efforts to stifle free speech and sniping by
those who think it "unpatriotic" to point out the dangerous shortcomings
of the current administration.

We're less than two months out from Bush's announced Iraqi takeover of
that country. With the situation in Iraq as bad as it is today, you have
to wonder if there will be any Bush-picked "leaders" of Iraq still alive
by then to take over anything.

Personally, I don't think we'll be in Iraq long enough for it to beome
the quagmire Vietnam became, but Bush's incomptency certainly has turned
his efforts in Iraq into a debacle.

We cannot afford four more years of George W. Bush.

She has a right to question, especially as a leader of the Democratic party.
Even has a right to slant the speech, but it was a bunch of polemic
blathering.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Marty Feldman wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

Even the local liberal radio station was making bad comments about
Pelosi's
speech. Being a leader of the Democrat party, she should stick to
facts.




fact is, bush launched into iraq to eliminate WMDs that has yet to be
found. not enough dems have called into question bush's competence,
if you ask me.



A discussion about whether Bush is competent to be POTUS is relevant
under any circumstances, and at any level. The POTUS is the most
important person in the world, and if, as now, a nincompoop holds the
job, we're in a world of ****. As we are now.

Pelosi performed a valuable public service by questioning Bush's
competency. Hopefully the question will reverberate on the Sunday
discussion shows, and make its way into the general media this coming
week, despite ongoing GOP efforts to stifle free speech and sniping by
those who think it "unpatriotic" to point out the dangerous shortcomings
of the current administration.

We're less than two months out from Bush's announced Iraqi takeover of
that country. With the situation in Iraq as bad as it is today, you have
to wonder if there will be any Bush-picked "leaders" of Iraq still alive
by then to take over anything.

Personally, I don't think we'll be in Iraq long enough for it to beome
the quagmire Vietnam became, but Bush's incomptency certainly has turned
his efforts in Iraq into a debacle.

We cannot afford four more years of George W. Bush.

If you saw a movie in which a guy in colonial wardrobe was saying the exact
same thing about the British rulers, you probably would've told your kids to
come into the living room to watch it because it was inspirational.

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
nk.net...
She has a right to question, especially as a leader of the Democratic
party.
Even has a right to slant the speech, but it was a bunch of polemic
blathering.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Marty Feldman wrote:

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...

Even the local liberal radio station was making bad comments about
Pelosi's
speech. Being a leader of the Democrat party, she should stick to
facts.




fact is, bush launched into iraq to eliminate WMDs that has yet to be
found. not enough dems have called into question bush's competence,
if you ask me.



A discussion about whether Bush is competent to be POTUS is relevant
under any circumstances, and at any level. The POTUS is the most
important person in the world, and if, as now, a nincompoop holds the
job, we're in a world of ****. As we are now.

Pelosi performed a valuable public service by questioning Bush's
competency. Hopefully the question will reverberate on the Sunday
discussion shows, and make its way into the general media this coming
week, despite ongoing GOP efforts to stifle free speech and sniping by
those who think it "unpatriotic" to point out the dangerous shortcomings
of the current administration.

We're less than two months out from Bush's announced Iraqi takeover of
that country. With the situation in Iraq as bad as it is today, you have
to wonder if there will be any Bush-picked "leaders" of Iraq still alive
by then to take over anything.

Personally, I don't think we'll be in Iraq long enough for it to beome
the quagmire Vietnam became, but Bush's incomptency certainly has turned
his efforts in Iraq into a debacle.

We cannot afford four more years of George W. Bush.

"Marty Feldman" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...
Even the local liberal radio station was making bad comments about
Pelosi's
speech. Being a leader of the Democrat party, she should stick to
facts.



fact is, bush launched into iraq to eliminate WMDs that has yet to be
found. not enough dems have called into question bush's competence,
if you ask me.

How much WMD found in Iraq will satisfy you?

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ...
"Marty Feldman" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
ink.net...
Even the local liberal radio station was making bad comments about
Pelosi's
speech. Being a leader of the Democrat party, she should stick to
facts.



fact is, bush launched into iraq to eliminate WMDs that has yet to be
found. not enough dems have called into question bush's competence,
if you ask me.

How much WMD found in Iraq will satisfy you?


100 to 500 tons of it, as they claimed before the war, not to mention
iraq's "mushroom cloud" nuclear threat.

Marty Feldman wrote:

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ...

"Marty Feldman" wrote in message
.com...

"Calif Bill" wrote in message

ink.net...

Even the local liberal radio station was making bad comments about

Pelosi's

speech. Being a leader of the Democrat party, she should stick to

facts.



fact is, bush launched into iraq to eliminate WMDs that has yet to be
found. not enough dems have called into question bush's competence,
if you ask me.

How much WMD found in Iraq will satisfy you?



100 to 500 tons of it, as they claimed before the war, not to mention
iraq's "mushroom cloud" nuclear threat.


The WMD issue has no credibility. If any significant stashes are found
now, you'd have to be suspicious of the "finders."