"Jack Goff" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 16:33:16 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"Jack Goff" wrote:

Huh? Your "short version" has nothing to do with your previous
statements. Nothing in there points to how you came to know that
"Bush wants a yes man", or that he can't recognize a conservative.
Nothing.

Your puppy is running out of groups to appeal to for votes. The one gang
he
can still depend on is BTCs - Big Time Christians, who are obsessed with
just one issue to the exclusion of all others: Abortion. Therefore, when
he
chooses judges (and more importantly, when he brags about his choices), he
MUST focus on people he can point to and make simple claims for.
Naturally,
since no sane judge really wants to be associated with Bush, except for
long
enough to get the job, only the worst candidates will make public and
simplistic statements about abortion. The qualified individuals know it's
not a simple issue.

So, your boy needs a yes man. Someone of low enough quality to appeal to
the
BTCs.


You worked yourself into quite a lather spinning that one up.
Unfortunately, it doesn't make much sense.

President Bush picked a high quality judge for his Supreme Court
nominee. One that is so non-political, he is anything but a "yes
man". He is fairly conservative, but, once again, so non-political
that he has the support of many democrats, both in the past and
present. He's a very smart pick, as he has nothing for the looney
liberal left to get traction on, but he's still conservative.

You liberals have been out-foxed by President Bush again.

BTW... you liberals claim all the time that Bush is just a puppet, and
is actually controlled by people in the background. Now you're giving
him full credit for picking a "yes man", and not being able to discern
a conservative when he appoints one. So which is it, Doug? Is
President Bush running the show, or not? You can't have it both
ways... you're obviously lying when you take one of those positions,
unless you actually can't make up your mind. Which is it in your
opinion... did our President make the choice himself, good or bad, or
is he just a mouthpiece? Careful... you'll be graded, and judged, on
your choice later.

And through it all, you've still failed to show how your opinions are
anything but that... opinions.


As I've explained to you in the past, there is no possibility that your
puppy is not damaged in some way. I know it would disturb your day to day
trance to admit it, but at some point in the future, you will. You probably
want a fancy clinical name for his condition, but I can't help you with
that. It's enough to say that if you were interviewing for a job that
required any sort of intelligence and someone like him came along, you'd
move his job application to the bottom of the pile. You know that.