On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:19:38 GMT, Don White wrote:

HarryKrause wrote:
*JimH* wrote:


Maybe you should recruit Chuck. He used to sell used cars and would
be perfect for your company.



It's mildly interesting that you and several other right-wing
trashmeisters here steadfastly refuse to discuss what it is you do for a
living, but never hesitate to knock what others do for a living.

This is a fairly consistent pattern among many (not all) of the
right-wingers here...knock the other other on what he does, where lives,
how he lives, et cetera, but don't post any "revealing" information
about yourself.

And, of course, you take it a step farther: you knock the boats of
others, without actually having a boat yourself.

You are some piece of work, Mr. Moped.


Imagine...a boatless 'Natural Born Liar' with a Moped and a blowup
dinghy stuffed in his attic, trashing another member because of the
modest size on his sailboat.
This guy is shameless. This newsgroup should have minimal standards for
membership.

The standards *are* minimal! Pressing buttons on a keyboard is not the
equivalent of the GRE.


--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:44:39 -0400, John H. wrote:

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:19:38 GMT, Don White wrote:

HarryKrause wrote:
*JimH* wrote:


Maybe you should recruit Chuck. He used to sell used cars and would
be perfect for your company.



It's mildly interesting that you and several other right-wing
trashmeisters here steadfastly refuse to discuss what it is you do for a
living, but never hesitate to knock what others do for a living.

This is a fairly consistent pattern among many (not all) of the
right-wingers here...knock the other other on what he does, where lives,
how he lives, et cetera, but don't post any "revealing" information
about yourself.

And, of course, you take it a step farther: you knock the boats of
others, without actually having a boat yourself.

You are some piece of work, Mr. Moped.


Imagine...a boatless 'Natural Born Liar' with a Moped and a blowup
dinghy stuffed in his attic, trashing another member because of the
modest size on his sailboat.
This guy is shameless. This newsgroup should have minimal standards for
membership.

The standards *are* minimal! Pressing buttons on a keyboard is not the
equivalent of the GRE.

Will someone hurry up and say, "You should know, John, you barely meet 'em!"

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Harry,
The difference between my word and yours, is I have never lied in rec.boats.
Your persona in rec.boats is nothing but a lie.

So why didn't you go to Rutgers? Were you SAT too low to get into a good
state school?


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Real Name wrote:
Harry,

I know that,

Sorry, but I don't take the word of anonymous posters.

NYOB,
I would give 100 to 1 odds that Harry never owned Global Crossing Stock.


"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Real Name" wrote in message
...
Harry,
In one of your bragging moments you bragged about how much money you
made with Ullico stock.


No. He bragged about making money on Global Crossing...which is the
Democrat's "Enron"...and a company that ULLICO and Terry McAuliffe
profited on from insider trading.



That's correct, but I didn't make any money because of "insider" trading.

So says you.

Harry,
No one believes my name is "Real Name" or any other handle I have used in
here. I have not told anyone that any of the handles I have used is my real
name. It has always been very obvious to everyone, including you, when I
change handles, hence I have never lied.

You on the other hand are a compulsive liar. The question I have is why?

I am really curious why you chose U of Kansas. Certainly there are some
better 3rd state schools you could have attended.




"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Real Name wrote:
Harry,
The difference between my word and yours, is I have never lied in
rec.boats.

This from a dipstick who has posted here under 50 different handles.

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:25:13 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...


Apparently Doug equates slick public speaking with intelligence, moral
character etc.......which is why they got taken by Clintoon............if
spekaing ability were a measure of intelligence, stutters must be
stupid.,
and we all know that is not true.

"Some of these people have been trained to disassemble. That means to not
tell the truth". - George Bush

Sorry, Goff, but the boy not only screws up, but back up his mistakes with
definitions. This one was on television, by the way, not in a story from one
of the grownup news sources you like to slam.


You're not to bright, are you Doug? You were replying to a post by
Fritz, not me. A little CRS kicking in?

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 22:12:08 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

Jack Goff wrote:
?

I have hired a guy that is not well spoken, but is *very* intelligent,
and is one of our top performers. We have another that is not
visually pleasing, but is very effective at his job.


You're not too "well-spoken" yourself, bubba. Check the proper usage of
"that" and "who."

I'm an engineer, not a writer. I know the usage, and would have
caught it on a careful proofread. This NG is not that important.


I have a couple of simple tests for the few people I hire from time to
time and for the writers I help clients hire.

Your "test" may work for writers, but that's about it. It's no
definitive indication of anything, and gives you but a cursory glance
at their reading, speaking, and writing abilities. Again, no real
indication of actual intelligence, reasoning ability, etc.

Maybe you can dodge reality and point out another typo or grammar rule
I violated?

Harry,
If you know of one incorrect assumption I have made let me know.

You are here for one reason, to argue politics by making personal insults to
those you disagree. You have made your education, your boats and your
wife's education and profession as a means to attack those whose political
beliefs disagree with yours.

Since I am substantially smarter than you, it is fairly easy to catch you
are your lies. You did not go to Yale, your wife is not a MD, and you don't
own a Lobster Boat. It would be very easy to prove the validity of all of
these "claims" of yours, but you don't. Let someone question if you own a
Parker, and you mail Chuck Gould a copy of the bill of sale, want to make
$1000 bets and go on and on. When people offer to make the same bet about
your Lobster Boat you back down. You said your wife is a MD, but Maryland
has never heard of a doctor with the name Karen Grear, but a Karen Grear
works at the same place you do as a in house social worker.

What incorrect assumptions have I made?






"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Mr. R. Name wrote:
Harry,
No one believes my name is "Real Name" or any other handle I have used in
here.

You ALWAYS are here under false pretenses, sailing under a false name,
never really revealing anything about yourself, but always quick to make
judgments (and usually incorrect ones) about others. You are perfectly
matched to the rest of the right-wing stunatz in he Hertvik, Robbins,
Tuuk, et cetera. You know...the empty suit crowd.

"Jack Goff" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:25:13 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...


Apparently Doug equates slick public speaking with intelligence, moral
character etc.......which is why they got taken by
Clintoon............if
spekaing ability were a measure of intelligence, stutters must be
stupid.,
and we all know that is not true.

"Some of these people have been trained to disassemble. That means to
not
tell the truth". - George Bush

Sorry, Goff, but the boy not only screws up, but back up his mistakes
with
definitions. This one was on television, by the way, not in a story from
one
of the grownup news sources you like to slam.


You're not to bright, are you Doug? You were replying to a post by
Fritz, not me. A little CRS kicking in?

And it still has nothing to do with his intelligence........doug has yet
to show any proof of a link between public speaking ability and
intelligence...

Maybe doug can learn something about his failed tactics

Bush Bashing Fizzles
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/Com..._25_05_MB.html

Harry,
Are you ashamed of yourself for
making up these stories?


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Mr. R. Name wrote:
Harry,
If you know of one incorrect assumption I have made let me know.

Since you read every word I post here, you are well aware of the
corrections to the b.s. you post here. There's no reason for me to repost
these corrections.

Further, you sail here under false colors. Therefore, *everything you
post* may be assumed to be false.

Finally, I haven't the slightest interest in playing your silly game.

At best, You are a miserably insufferable heathen and a debauched,
dandruff-eating presumptuous pejorative prattler.