"NOYB" wrote in message
...
Shouldn't you be on your way to Chicago for the AFL-CIO Convention
tomorrow?

Right after he visits Washington for a little R & R
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...8_farm16m.html



Or are you part of the 4 million members who will be leaving them?


http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050724/D8BI21R80.html




"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Jack Goff wrote:
?

I have hired a guy that is not well spoken, but is *very* intelligent,
and is one of our top performers. We have another that is not
visually pleasing, but is very effective at his job.


You're not too "well-spoken" yourself, bubba. Check the proper usage of
"that" and "who."

I have a couple of simple tests for the few people I hire from time to
time and for the writers I help clients hire.

I listen to them speak. If they speak poorly, they don't get to stage
two.

Stage two is the same test I wanted George W. Bush and Al Gore to take:
read aloud from a page selected at random from a high-school level
novel.
If they cannot read aloud flawlessly, that's the end of the test.
Typically, I pick a page from something Dickens or Melville wrote.

Stage three is a writing test. I give them a writing assignment and a
day
to complete it. If I'm not satisfied with the results, that's the end of
the test.

George W. Bush is nothing more than an affable dummy. He was a failure
in
business. The job of governor of Texas is a non-job. And he's been a
miserable, dangerous failure as POTUS.

wrote in message
oups.com...
How hilarious! There's an "on-line poll" at the website you linked. I
thought it would be interersting to participate. Apparently there is a
built in "liberal alarm" depending on the nature of the answers on the
first couple of pages. To avoid getting any opinions that might skew
the desired outcome, the poll just simply shuts down about halfway
through with a blank page and a note that the remainder of the survey
is "unavailable". Is this truly a technical glitch, or are you guys so
used to screwing with the truth you can't even run a legit suvey? :-)
It must be a "glitch" as I just took the poll and it went all the way to the
end.
Jim

"Real Name" wrote in message
...
Harry,
YOU are the one who started insulting people based upon what boat they
owned, where they lived, what they did for a living, where they went to
school etc.

That is the liebral way...........whine about others doing what they are
guilty of


You are just upset because the straw house you built based upon what boat
you owned, where you went to school, what your wife does for a living and
where you went to school has been proven to be a complete fabrication.

He's upset that we won't divulge enough information for him to stalk



"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:


Maybe you should recruit Chuck. He used to sell used cars and would be
perfect for your company.


It's mildly interesting that you and several other right-wing
trashmeisters here steadfastly refuse to discuss what it is you do for a
living, but never hesitate to knock what others do for a living.

This is a fairly consistent pattern among many (not all) of the
right-wingers here...knock the other other on what he does, where lives,
how he lives, et cetera, but don't post any "revealing" information
about
yourself.

And, of course, you take it a step farther: you knock the boats of
others,
without actually having a boat yourself.

You are some piece of work, Mr. Moped.

Harry,

Most people prefer pretty women to dogs, but most men do not use physical
attributes as the number one description of their wife. You have always
gone to great lengths to talk about your wife's physical beauty and age
difference.

Considering the misinformation you have given us about her education, it is
safe to assume she is old and ugly as sin.






"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
P. Fritz wrote:

Just like harry when he descirbes women.


Indeed, Fritz, I prefer pretty women to dogs, especially when I'm married.
Your mileage obviously differs. One question, though: was your wife pretty
before you beat her up?

Harry,

I find it extremely amusing to burst your bubble.


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Real Name wrote:
Harry,
Please don't place your hang-ups on me.

You're the obsessed one, dipstick.



Since you want to know more about me, let me tell you. I am married to a
wonderful woman, I have children who I am very proud of, I own a boat, I
own a car, and I graduated from college.

Sorry, I have no reason to believe any of that.


I even told you my name, or at least I
told you how to find it.


I already knew your name, dipstick.

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...


Apparently Doug equates slick public speaking with intelligence, moral
character etc.......which is why they got taken by Clintoon............if
spekaing ability were a measure of intelligence, stutters must be
stupid.,
and we all know that is not true.

"Some of these people have been trained to disassemble. That means to not
tell the truth". - George Bush

Sorry, Goff, but the boy not only screws up, but back up his mistakes with
definitions. This one was on television, by the way, not in a story from one
of the grownup news sources you like to slam.



I had a stutterer work for me for a couple of years.......the guy was one
of
the most intelligent honest people I have ever dealt with.

Stuttering (which is now called "fluency" by speech pathologists) has
nothing to do with intelligence, and certainly not honesty. No idea why you
threw in that last idea, and I'm sure you don't, either.

"Real Name" wrote in message
...
Harry,

Most people prefer pretty women to dogs, but most men do not use physical
attributes as the number one description of their wife. You have always
gone to great lengths to talk about your wife's physical beauty and age
difference.

Harry's has exposed himself as a sexist pig.......I wonder what NOW would
think of him.


Considering the misinformation you have given us about her education, it
is
safe to assume she is old and ugly as sin.






"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
P. Fritz wrote:

Just like harry when he descirbes women.


Indeed, Fritz, I prefer pretty women to dogs, especially when I'm
married.
Your mileage obviously differs. One question, though: was your wife
pretty
before you beat her up?

HarryKrause wrote:
*JimH* wrote:


Maybe you should recruit Chuck. He used to sell used cars and would
be perfect for your company.



It's mildly interesting that you and several other right-wing
trashmeisters here steadfastly refuse to discuss what it is you do for a
living, but never hesitate to knock what others do for a living.

This is a fairly consistent pattern among many (not all) of the
right-wingers here...knock the other other on what he does, where lives,
how he lives, et cetera, but don't post any "revealing" information
about yourself.

And, of course, you take it a step farther: you knock the boats of
others, without actually having a boat yourself.

You are some piece of work, Mr. Moped.


Imagine...a boatless 'Natural Born Liar' with a Moped and a blowup
dinghy stuffed in his attic, trashing another member because of the
modest size on his sailboat.
This guy is shameless. This newsgroup should have minimal standards for
membership.

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
Shouldn't you be on your way to Chicago for the AFL-CIO Convention
tomorrow?

Or are you part of the 4 million members who will be leaving them?

If I go, it'll just be for a day, and just to say "hello." I've done a
lot of work over the years for the federation and some of its
affiliates, but never get involved in their internal politics.

But if you don't go, how will you pitch the idea of a "soldier's union"
to them?



It was a joke; I had hoped you would "get" it.

I "got" it. I was just using the example to probe as to why you weren't in
Chicago.


Besides, if there were such a move, it would be most appealing to the
Service Employees, and that group seems intent on marching out of the
federation for reasons I wouldn't discuss here.


I thought you said that you "never get involved in their internal
politics". So how do you know the reason why groups with 4 million members
are leaving the AFL-CIO?

It sounds like all you are looking for is a well spoken shyster who can
sweet talk and scam people out of their money and then write up a good
report of the transaction......sort of like your old job where you stole
money from union members....can you say Ullico?

Maybe you should recruit Chuck. He used to sell used cars and would be
perfect for your company.


Attempt to start snot fight noted. Again.

What's that whine-line you trot out when people take your bait,
something about obsession? I wish you'd revive that old chestnut you
used to rely on, "It must suck to be you!" A little variety would be
appreciated.

Cast elsewhere, a tiny nibble but no bite here.