Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Kanter" wrote in message news ![]() "NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... "DSK" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: What positive contributions have the Arab nations made to society in the last 100 years? WTF?? Are you still on the "let's launch a holy crusade to exterminate the Arabs" kick? Let's assume, for a moment, that Arabs have not made any 'contributions to society' in the past 100 years. Does that justify a war against any or all Arab and/or Muslim nations? My comment was in reponse to the statement that all Arab nations hate us. Essentially, I'm saying "who cares"...they're irrelevant in the whole scheme of things...unless of course they attack us. Only *then* do they become relevant...and then I *do* say that their lack of contributions to society should be considered when we're deciding just how many kiloton nuke we should drop on 'em. What positive contributions have *you* made, NOBBY? Many. Let me use an anology. Were I to be arrested, for instance, the judge would look at my long list of positive contributions to my community...and his punishment would be doled out accordingly. If I were a jobless vagrant who had many run-ins with the law and never contributed anything useful to society, I'd have a lot harsher punishment. It happens all the time in our justice system. I'm saying "let's apply the same standard to nations". Time to bomb Iceland, then. Obviously the point zipped right over your head. If Iceland were turning out terrorists as rapidly as the Middle East, you'd have to weigh its positive contributions vs. its negative contributions to society when deciding what level of punishment to inflict upon them. |