P. Fritz wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On 5 Jul 2005 08:29:25 -0700, "
wrote:



P. Fritz wrote:
"Real Name" wrote in message
...
Harry,
Are you suggesting JimH and I are homosexual?

Is that an insult?


It is always funny to watch liebral pretend to be so accepting of gays,
and
then are the first to through around the insults.......typical
hypocrites


It's frequently sad to observe anybody- liberal or conserative, who
believes the entire world can be reduced to a small group of absolute
stereotypes.

I wonder if a lot of these people aren't bitterly disappointed in the
end, when the world refuses to conform to their model? Heck, I'll bet
some of them are bitter and disappointed already.

(Learn to spell "throw". "Through" is obviously not a typo,-nobody
mistypes u,g,h instead of w- and it creates a certain
impression.......)

It is awlays easy to see when chuckie's buttons are
pushed...............must have hit close to home.......the hypocrite that he
is.


"your" rite. Gettin' a self-reichus leckshure from a gei too damm
stoopid or uneddikated to spell "throw" without a u,g,h on the ind is a
reel buttin pushir.

wrote in message

..... As I recall, the Monk is built in
a community with a tradition of producing commercial fish boats- and
without re-checking specifically I believe it's in SE Canada.

Clarks Harbour, Nova Scotia; not too far from Yarmouth

.....At the
time, every Monk built underwent final a Sea Trial as each boat needed
to be moved across some decent sized body of water to some port where
they could be loaded for truck transport.

Right. Most are run on their own bottom across the Gulf of Maine to an east
coast (US) location. This constitutes as fine a sea trial as you could come
up with anywhere. AFAIK, they only build about 2 a year.

JG

John Gaquin wrote:
wrote in message


..... As I recall, the Monk is built in
a community with a tradition of producing commercial fish boats- and
without re-checking specifically I believe it's in SE Canada.


Clarks Harbour, Nova Scotia; not too far from Yarmouth


.....At the
time, every Monk built underwent final a Sea Trial as each boat needed
to be moved across some decent sized body of water to some port where
they could be loaded for truck transport.


Right. Most are run on their own bottom across the Gulf of Maine to an east
coast (US) location. This constitutes as fine a sea trial as you could come
up with anywhere. AFAIK, they only build about 2 a year.

JG



Might be something in here...
http://nsonline.com/Sports_and_Recre.../complete.html

Harry if you were not implying or stating Hertvik and I were homosexuals
what were you implying? That we were heterosexuals who liked to engage in
homosexual behavior?


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
wrote:

P. Fritz wrote:
"Real Name" wrote in message
...
Harry,
Are you suggesting JimH and I are homosexual?

Is that an insult?

It is always funny to watch liebral pretend to be so accepting of gays,
and
then are the first to through around the insults.......typical
hypocrites


It's frequently sad to observe anybody- liberal or conserative, who
believes the entire world can be reduced to a small group of absolute
stereotypes.

I wonder if a lot of these people aren't bitterly disappointed in the
end, when the world refuses to conform to their model? Heck, I'll bet
some of them are bitter and disappointed already.

(Learn to spell "throw". "Through" is obviously not a typo,-nobody
mistypes u,g,h instead of w- and it creates a certain
impression.......)



Indeed. I did not state or imply Smithers and Hertvik were homosexuals.
The fact is, if they were, they would be far better people than they are.

--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

Gould
Hopefully Harry does not come close to representing liberals. It is funny
that Harry likes to pretend he is liberal, but then thinks a homosexual jab
is a insult.


wrote in message
oups.com...


P. Fritz wrote:
"Real Name" wrote in message
...
Harry,
Are you suggesting JimH and I are homosexual?

Is that an insult?


It is always funny to watch liebral pretend to be so accepting of gays,
and
then are the first to through around the insults.......typical hypocrites


It's frequently sad to observe anybody- liberal or conserative, who
believes the entire world can be reduced to a small group of absolute
stereotypes.

I wonder if a lot of these people aren't bitterly disappointed in the
end, when the world refuses to conform to their model? Heck, I'll bet
some of them are bitter and disappointed already.

(Learn to spell "throw". "Through" is obviously not a typo,-nobody
mistypes u,g,h instead of w- and it creates a certain
impression.......)

"Real Name" wrote in message
...
Harry if you were not implying or stating Hertvik and I were homosexuals
what were you implying? That we were heterosexuals who liked to engage in
homosexual behavior?

I think harry was having one of his homoerotic fantasies.



"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
wrote:

P. Fritz wrote:
"Real Name" wrote in message
...
Harry,
Are you suggesting JimH and I are homosexual?

Is that an insult?

It is always funny to watch liebral pretend to be so accepting of
gays,
and
then are the first to through around the insults.......typical
hypocrites


It's frequently sad to observe anybody- liberal or conserative, who
believes the entire world can be reduced to a small group of absolute
stereotypes.

I wonder if a lot of these people aren't bitterly disappointed in the
end, when the world refuses to conform to their model? Heck, I'll bet
some of them are bitter and disappointed already.

(Learn to spell "throw". "Through" is obviously not a typo,-nobody
mistypes u,g,h instead of w- and it creates a certain
impression.......)



Indeed. I did not state or imply Smithers and Hertvik were homosexuals.
The fact is, if they were, they would be far better people than they
are.

--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

Kevin,
What do you think the question means? Do you think he was implying that
Hertik and I get together to throw a baseball back and forth? What do you
think he was implying? Think abstractly now. I know you are up to it.


wrote in message
oups.com...


Real Name wrote:
So what were you suggesting Harry?

Learn to read, Smithers. He wasn't suggesting ANYTHING. He was asking a
question:
"I am curious about one thing, though. When you and Hertvik play with
each other, do you pitch or catch?"

"Real Name" wrote in message
...
Gould
Hopefully Harry does not come close to representing liberals. It is
funny
that Harry likes to pretend he is liberal, but then thinks a homosexual
jab
is a insult.

Unfortunately, harry appears to be typical of the type of liebral that is
now controlling the DNC



wrote in message
oups.com...


P. Fritz wrote:
"Real Name" wrote in message
...
Harry,
Are you suggesting JimH and I are homosexual?

Is that an insult?


It is always funny to watch liebral pretend to be so accepting of gays,
and
then are the first to through around the insults.......typical
hypocrites


It's frequently sad to observe anybody- liberal or conserative, who
believes the entire world can be reduced to a small group of absolute
stereotypes.

I wonder if a lot of these people aren't bitterly disappointed in the
end, when the world refuses to conform to their model? Heck, I'll bet
some of them are bitter and disappointed already.

(Learn to spell "throw". "Through" is obviously not a typo,-nobody
mistypes u,g,h instead of w- and it creates a certain
impression.......)

"Real Name" wrote in message
...
Kevin,
What do you think the question means? Do you think he was implying that
Hertik and I get together to throw a baseball back and forth? What do you
think he was implying? Think abstractly now. I know you are up to it.

And yet Kevin got so upset when I asked a simply question of
him.........................



wrote in message
oups.com...


Real Name wrote:
So what were you suggesting Harry?

Learn to read, Smithers. He wasn't suggesting ANYTHING. He was asking a
question:
"I am curious about one thing, though. When you and Hertvik play with
each other, do you pitch or catch?"

On 6 Jul 2005 08:52:55 -0700, " wrote:



Chuck, have you ever done a write-up on the Monk 36 trawler?

--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD

Yes, but it has been a few years and I'd have to dig through some old
disks to find it.

I took a close look at a traditional tri-cabin layout, master stateroom
aft, and noticed, generally, that the Monk maintains most of the
advantages and lovable characteristics of the ubiquitous "Taiwan
trawler" while solving a number of
the most common problems. Better windows and deck hardware, much lower
maintenance exteriors, identifiable brand-name systems, better wiring
than some of the cheap-and dirty Taiwan boats used to feature. (Some
Taiwan boats are very nicely wired). As I recall, the Monk is built in
a community with a tradition of producing commercial fish boats- and
without re-checking specifically I believe it's in SE Canada. At the
time, every Monk built underwent final a Sea Trial as each boat needed
to be moved across some decent sized body of water to some port where
they could be loaded for truck transport.

If I were looking for a new, 36-foot trawler I would include the Monk
in the deliberations. I'm surprised the boat isn't more widely
available, but that may be due to limited factory capacity rather then
slack demand.

Thanks, Chuck, I appreciate the time. I've fallen in love with the Monk 36 (from
Nova Scotia, btw). Now I have to think about money!! That'll take some time.


--
John H.
On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD