Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Sat, 15 May 2004 19:41:21 GMT, "Tony Thomas" wrote: First of all - I think you have drastically underestimated the weight. According to the SeaRay website - the 21' Sport has a dry weight of 3150 lbs. Add 40 gallons of fuel (240 lbs) battery, life jackets, all your stuff and your at 3500 lbs for the boat. Now add another 1000 lbs (or more) for the 21' trailer (I assume it is tandem axle w/ brakes) and your at 4500 lbs. 4500 lbs is way too much for a minivan to tow and not destroy the transmission. Look at SUVs or 4 door trucks. And remember, if the vehicle is rated for 4900 lbs, 4500 is going to be a real load at highway speeds and you will not maintain 70 mph going up an kind of a hill. You need something rated for 5500 lbs or so to make it a comfortable tow. Based on the weight calculated by Tony, you'll need a tow vehicle with a V8. BTW, for my 21' Center console I bought a LoadRite galvanized, tandem-axle trailer with disk brakes on all four wheels last fall and it weighs 1,250 pounds. The Tundra has the best reliability rating in "Consumer Reports" magazine and the Ford F-150 is next. You can get either one with an extended cab or a double-size cab. For an SUV, the Toyota 4-Runner rates very high and it has been available with a V8 beginning with the 2003 model year. Based on what I hear from an acquaintance who visits the 3 American manufacturers, helping them set up their machining equipment: Keep in mind that Ford's engine manufacturing tolerances are measures in feet, instead of thousandths of an inch, like Toyota's. So, even if Ford's reliability ratings are close to Toyota's, the Ford will be puking burnt oil out of the tailpipe from the minute it's driven away from the dealer's lot. Chevy & Chrysler aren't far behind. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Darn, I wouldn't mind getting my hands on a Ford 302 with pistons off sized
by feet instead of thousandth's of an inch.... That would be amazing to see.... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Sat, 15 May 2004 19:41:21 GMT, "Tony Thomas" wrote: First of all - I think you have drastically underestimated the weight. According to the SeaRay website - the 21' Sport has a dry weight of 3150 lbs. Add 40 gallons of fuel (240 lbs) battery, life jackets, all your stuff and your at 3500 lbs for the boat. Now add another 1000 lbs (or more) for the 21' trailer (I assume it is tandem axle w/ brakes) and your at 4500 lbs. 4500 lbs is way too much for a minivan to tow and not destroy the transmission. Look at SUVs or 4 door trucks. And remember, if the vehicle is rated for 4900 lbs, 4500 is going to be a real load at highway speeds and you will not maintain 70 mph going up an kind of a hill. You need something rated for 5500 lbs or so to make it a comfortable tow. Based on the weight calculated by Tony, you'll need a tow vehicle with a V8. BTW, for my 21' Center console I bought a LoadRite galvanized, tandem-axle trailer with disk brakes on all four wheels last fall and it weighs 1,250 pounds. The Tundra has the best reliability rating in "Consumer Reports" magazine and the Ford F-150 is next. You can get either one with an extended cab or a double-size cab. For an SUV, the Toyota 4-Runner rates very high and it has been available with a V8 beginning with the 2003 model year. Based on what I hear from an acquaintance who visits the 3 American manufacturers, helping them set up their machining equipment: Keep in mind that Ford's engine manufacturing tolerances are measures in feet, instead of thousandths of an inch, like Toyota's. So, even if Ford's reliability ratings are close to Toyota's, the Ford will be puking burnt oil out of the tailpipe from the minute it's driven away from the dealer's lot. Chevy & Chrysler aren't far behind. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You knew that was an exaggeration, to prove a point.
wrote in message news ![]() Darn, I wouldn't mind getting my hands on a Ford 302 with pistons off sized by feet instead of thousandth's of an inch.... That would be amazing to see.... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Sat, 15 May 2004 19:41:21 GMT, "Tony Thomas" wrote: First of all - I think you have drastically underestimated the weight. According to the SeaRay website - the 21' Sport has a dry weight of 3150 lbs. Add 40 gallons of fuel (240 lbs) battery, life jackets, all your stuff and your at 3500 lbs for the boat. Now add another 1000 lbs (or more) for the 21' trailer (I assume it is tandem axle w/ brakes) and your at 4500 lbs. 4500 lbs is way too much for a minivan to tow and not destroy the transmission. Look at SUVs or 4 door trucks. And remember, if the vehicle is rated for 4900 lbs, 4500 is going to be a real load at highway speeds and you will not maintain 70 mph going up an kind of a hill. You need something rated for 5500 lbs or so to make it a comfortable tow. Based on the weight calculated by Tony, you'll need a tow vehicle with a V8. BTW, for my 21' Center console I bought a LoadRite galvanized, tandem-axle trailer with disk brakes on all four wheels last fall and it weighs 1,250 pounds. The Tundra has the best reliability rating in "Consumer Reports" magazine and the Ford F-150 is next. You can get either one with an extended cab or a double-size cab. For an SUV, the Toyota 4-Runner rates very high and it has been available with a V8 beginning with the 2003 model year. Based on what I hear from an acquaintance who visits the 3 American manufacturers, helping them set up their machining equipment: Keep in mind that Ford's engine manufacturing tolerances are measures in feet, instead of thousandths of an inch, like Toyota's. So, even if Ford's reliability ratings are close to Toyota's, the Ford will be puking burnt oil out of the tailpipe from the minute it's driven away from the dealer's lot. Chevy & Chrysler aren't far behind. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 16 May 2004 00:31:00 GMT, something compelled "Doug
Kanter" , to say: Keep in mind that Ford's engine manufacturing tolerances are measures in feet, instead of thousandths of an inch, like Toyota's. So, even if Ford's reliability ratings are close to Toyota's, the Ford will be puking burnt oil out of the tailpipe from the minute it's driven away from the dealer's lot. Yeah, I heard that. It's why I insisted on an F-150 built by elves in Switzerland. One hundred forty thousand miles later its lederhosen has yet to fall down around its ankles. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug,
For the record Ford's engines are measured in microns. The leaking oil issue hasn't been around for years. Have you driven a Ford lately? Paul "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... On Sat, 15 May 2004 19:41:21 GMT, "Tony Thomas" wrote: First of all - I think you have drastically underestimated the weight. According to the SeaRay website - the 21' Sport has a dry weight of 3150 lbs. Add 40 gallons of fuel (240 lbs) battery, life jackets, all your stuff and your at 3500 lbs for the boat. Now add another 1000 lbs (or more) for the 21' trailer (I assume it is tandem axle w/ brakes) and your at 4500 lbs. 4500 lbs is way too much for a minivan to tow and not destroy the transmission. Look at SUVs or 4 door trucks. And remember, if the vehicle is rated for 4900 lbs, 4500 is going to be a real load at highway speeds and you will not maintain 70 mph going up an kind of a hill. You need something rated for 5500 lbs or so to make it a comfortable tow. Based on the weight calculated by Tony, you'll need a tow vehicle with a V8. BTW, for my 21' Center console I bought a LoadRite galvanized, tandem-axle trailer with disk brakes on all four wheels last fall and it weighs 1,250 pounds. The Tundra has the best reliability rating in "Consumer Reports" magazine and the Ford F-150 is next. You can get either one with an extended cab or a double-size cab. For an SUV, the Toyota 4-Runner rates very high and it has been available with a V8 beginning with the 2003 model year. Based on what I hear from an acquaintance who visits the 3 American manufacturers, helping them set up their machining equipment: Keep in mind that Ford's engine manufacturing tolerances are measures in feet, instead of thousandths of an inch, like Toyota's. So, even if Ford's reliability ratings are close to Toyota's, the Ford will be puking burnt oil out of the tailpipe from the minute it's driven away from the dealer's lot. Chevy & Chrysler aren't far behind. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Schilter" paulschilter@comcast,dot,net wrote in message
... Doug, For the record Ford's engines are measured in microns. The leaking oil issue hasn't been around for years. Have you driven a Ford lately? Paul I've driven behind them. New ones smell like they're old. Very strange. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Doug Kanter"
Keep in mind that Ford's engine manufacturing tolerances are measures in feet, instead of thousandths of an inch, like Toyota's. So, even if Ford's reliability ratings are close to Toyota's, the Ford will be puking burnt oil out of the tailpipe from the minute it's driven away from the dealer's lot. Chevy & Chrysler aren't far behind. Something must be terribly wrong with my old 89 F-150 with the 5.0 (302) engine. 294000 miles and still not burning a drop of oil. It has been used as a tow vehicle too. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
RGrew176 wrote:
Keep in mind that Ford's engine manufacturing tolerances are measures in feet, instead of thousandths of an inch, like Toyota's. So, even if Ford's reliability ratings are close to Toyota's, the Ford will be puking burnt oil out of the tailpipe from the minute it's driven away from the dealer's lot. Chevy & Chrysler aren't far behind. Something must be terribly wrong with my old 89 F-150 with the 5.0 (302) engine. 294000 miles and still not burning a drop of oil. It has been used as a tow vehicle too. '00 F250SD Ext Cab w/ V10 & 5 spd. Tow, push a snow plow, overload the bed fairly regularly. Doesn't burn oil at around 50k miles. The '90 Ranger w/ V6 didn't burn oil at 120k miles when I replaced it with the F250. It got punished pretty badly also. Ford has their share of troubles (I bought stock right BEFORE the Firestone tire debacle and the Explorer roll-overs sigh) but I think you are off base on the oil-burning characterization. dave -- ----- news_bucket e-mail address goes to a blackhole. Sorry. Send e-mail to "respond" at the same domain. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Hanoi John Kerry | General | |||
offshore fishing | General | |||
Where to find ramp stories? | General | |||
Dealing with a boat fire, checking for a common cause | General | |||
Repost from Merc group | General |