wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


wrote:
http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html

That's a hoot!

(But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't
lobbed at a specific individual)


Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so.

I remember you jumping on me for posting a similar juvenile picture,
but
one
not having any sexual connotations like this one does.

This picture and the post was a direct personal attack. But you find
it
a
"hoot" this time.....perhaps because it is directed towards me?
Indeed.

Double standards.

I understand now.



OK. I speak up for JimH when its appropriate and all I get is more of
his sour crap. So I'm a slow learner. Let's put some actual humor into
this thread:

Here's a funny item. There happens to be a guy with a really similar
name, living in about the same area, who belongs to the "MOPED Army".
This other guy, with a really similar name and living in about the same
area must be quite the sight all suited up for "battle". Imagine a big
hurking midwestern adult perched knees akimbo atop a tiny little
motorbike, (Red Baron leather helmet and owl-eyed goggles strapped on),
whizzing around the cul-de-sac and shouting out the Moped Army's
slogan: "Swarm and Destroy!" That's darn nearly as funny a mental image
as (name deleted but old timers know who) in his bikini underwear (gag
me, yet again).



If I were JimH, I'd track down this guy with a really similar name and
living in about the same area. Apparently he's fallen on hard times, is
resigning his commission in the Moped Army, and has been forced to put
his war horse up for sale. It might make sense to buy that thing, and
get the other JimH off the streets of (insert name of town here), just
to save whatever might be left of the family reputation.

"Swarm and Destroy", indeed.


You have officially joined the JimH stalking team. Congratulations.
Harry
is president, you have now been officially elected VP. What's next,
coming
to my house to spray paint it. Pathetic.

For your information that moped belonged to my son. He bought it with
his
own money. I was selling it for him and that was one site that
exclusively
dealt with mopeds.

Get a life Chuck. Then find some higher moral standards to live by.


Hmm, kind of like you and your **** buddy Fritz stalking ME??? Look at
any and every thread that I've posted to, and you two asswipes will be
there.


Please remind when I posted your address and phone number here Kevin.

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


wrote:
http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html

That's a hoot!

(But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't
lobbed at a specific individual)


Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so.

I remember you jumping on me for posting a similar juvenile picture,
but
one
not having any sexual connotations like this one does.

This picture and the post was a direct personal attack. But you find
it
a
"hoot" this time.....perhaps because it is directed towards me?
Indeed.

Double standards.

I understand now.



OK. I speak up for JimH when its appropriate and all I get is more of
his sour crap. So I'm a slow learner. Let's put some actual humor into
this thread:

Here's a funny item. There happens to be a guy with a really similar
name, living in about the same area, who belongs to the "MOPED Army".
This other guy, with a really similar name and living in about the
same
area must be quite the sight all suited up for "battle". Imagine a big
hurking midwestern adult perched knees akimbo atop a tiny little
motorbike, (Red Baron leather helmet and owl-eyed goggles strapped
on),
whizzing around the cul-de-sac and shouting out the Moped Army's
slogan: "Swarm and Destroy!" That's darn nearly as funny a mental
image
as (name deleted but old timers know who) in his bikini underwear (gag
me, yet again).



If I were JimH, I'd track down this guy with a really similar name and
living in about the same area. Apparently he's fallen on hard times,
is
resigning his commission in the Moped Army, and has been forced to put
his war horse up for sale. It might make sense to buy that thing, and
get the other JimH off the streets of (insert name of town here), just
to save whatever might be left of the family reputation.

"Swarm and Destroy", indeed.


You have officially joined the JimH stalking team. Congratulations.
Harry
is president, you have now been officially elected VP. What's next,
coming
to my house to spray paint it. Pathetic.

For your information that moped belonged to my son. He bought it with
his
own money. I was selling it for him and that was one site that
exclusively
dealt with mopeds.

Get a life Chuck. Then find some higher moral standards to live by.


Hmm, kind of like you and your **** buddy Fritz stalking ME??? Look at
any and every thread that I've posted to, and you two asswipes will be
there.


Please remind when I posted your address and phone number here Kevin.


.........or posted other personal information about you.

JimH wrote:

Exactly what personal comments did I make about you Chuck?

Where to start?

I don't keep a running inventory, but perhaps you'll accept recent
remarks by
some other posters as a clue of just where you might begin to look.

One recently commented, to Harry Krause, that you (JimH) are simply
doing the very same thing that Harry has done here for years. (only
better) You might find that post if you do a search for the phrase
"out-Krause Krause"

Earlier in this thread, one person noted that you have "done nothing
but attack Chuck".....where do you suppose he got that idea?

Also earlier in this thread, somebody referred to you as the Avon
Assassin.
Why would somebody do that?

Maybe it's a conspiracy?

I'll let you decide.

If most people accept that you've never made any personal comments
about me, then according to the man of a thousand screen names you will
have performed another "public service" by pointing that out, right?
:-)

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


wrote:
http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html

That's a hoot!

(But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't
lobbed at a specific individual)


Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so.

I remember you jumping on me for posting a similar juvenile picture,
but
one
not having any sexual connotations like this one does.

This picture and the post was a direct personal attack. But you
find
it
a
"hoot" this time.....perhaps because it is directed towards me?
Indeed.

Double standards.

I understand now.



OK. I speak up for JimH when its appropriate and all I get is more of
his sour crap. So I'm a slow learner. Let's put some actual humor
into
this thread:

Here's a funny item. There happens to be a guy with a really similar
name, living in about the same area, who belongs to the "MOPED Army".
This other guy, with a really similar name and living in about the
same
area must be quite the sight all suited up for "battle". Imagine a
big
hurking midwestern adult perched knees akimbo atop a tiny little
motorbike, (Red Baron leather helmet and owl-eyed goggles strapped
on),
whizzing around the cul-de-sac and shouting out the Moped Army's
slogan: "Swarm and Destroy!" That's darn nearly as funny a mental
image
as (name deleted but old timers know who) in his bikini underwear
(gag
me, yet again).



If I were JimH, I'd track down this guy with a really similar name
and
living in about the same area. Apparently he's fallen on hard times,
is
resigning his commission in the Moped Army, and has been forced to
put
his war horse up for sale. It might make sense to buy that thing, and
get the other JimH off the streets of (insert name of town here),
just
to save whatever might be left of the family reputation.

"Swarm and Destroy", indeed.


You have officially joined the JimH stalking team. Congratulations.
Harry
is president, you have now been officially elected VP. What's next,
coming
to my house to spray paint it. Pathetic.

For your information that moped belonged to my son. He bought it with
his
own money. I was selling it for him and that was one site that
exclusively
dealt with mopeds.

Get a life Chuck. Then find some higher moral standards to live by.


Hmm, kind of like you and your **** buddy Fritz stalking ME??? Look at
any and every thread that I've posted to, and you two asswipes will be
there.


Please remind when I posted your address and phone number here Kevin.

And show where I have ever responded to one of kevin's posts.

Kevin's hypocrisy slip is showing once again......

wrote in message
ups.com...

JimH wrote:

Exactly what personal comments did I make about you Chuck?

Where to start?

I don't keep a running inventory, but perhaps you'll accept recent
remarks by
some other posters as a clue of just where you might begin to look.

One recently commented, to Harry Krause, that you (JimH) are simply
doing the very same thing that Harry has done here for years. (only
better) You might find that post if you do a search for the phrase
"out-Krause Krause"

Earlier in this thread, one person noted that you have "done nothing
but attack Chuck".....where do you suppose he got that idea?

Also earlier in this thread, somebody referred to you as the Avon
Assassin.
Why would somebody do that?

Maybe it's a conspiracy?

I'll let you decide.

If most people accept that you've never made any personal comments
about me, then according to the man of a thousand screen names you will
have performed another "public service" by pointing that out, right?
:-)


I will ask again. And don't spin the answer this time but answer it
directly.

Exactly what personal comments did I make about you Chuck?

Yo Ho wrote:
I am glad you did not challenge the fact that boat magazines and those that
write for them have sold their soul to boat builders and suppliers.


I will let folks decide, for themselves, whether this particular bit
extracted from the rest of your easily disproven charges and "facts" is
any less BS than the others.

You're always welcome, at any time, to point out any technical
inaccuracies in something I post about a boat.

I will ask again. And don't spin the answer this time but answer it
directly.

Exactly what personal comments did I make about you Chuck?


I don't care to repeat them, or to spend the next several weeks looking
up your thousands of personal remarks and reposting them.

Go right ahead and claim you have never made any personal remarks, that
will be just as credible as everything else you "contribute" here. How
would one sit on that tiny little motorbike with such great big 'nads?

wrote in message
ups.com...



I will ask again. And don't spin the answer this time but answer it
directly.

Exactly what personal comments did I make about you Chuck?


I don't care to repeat them, or to spend the next several weeks looking
up your thousands of personal remarks and reposting them.

Sure. But it is easy to claim that I have made personal attacks on you.



Go right ahead and claim you have never made any personal remarks, that
will be just as credible as everything else you "contribute" here.

I never said I *never* did. Your claim was supposedly about recent personal
attacks I made (specific to your fluff review and SeaRay threads.

You have yet to produce any evidence of recent personal attacks on you by
me.

So once again I will ask:

Exactly what personal comments/attacks did I make about you Chuck?


How
would one sit on that tiny little motorbike with such great big 'nads?


Easy. I had almost as much fun using it as my son did.

Now why the personal insult to me Chuck? I thought this was just the thing
you were whining to me about.

Indeed, and for grins, notice how well I've concealed the wheels under
my travel-trailer garage:

http://i4.photobucket.com/albu=ADms/...Fish/yo=AD.jpg


I wish I had thought of that.

Pretty good Mr. Krause

Well, I've seen you do plenty of putting down others, but never saw
anything about your job or how you make your living

"but they are quick to put down what many other
people
who are more open about themselves do for a living...."


Mr. Krause....does that also include atl_m who started the thread?



Nope, it does not. I'm not at all ashamed of what I do for a living.

Chuck,
Everyone who has ever made a post concerning your fluff PR articles have
stated they understand they are PR fluff to sell ads. Even Harry and bass
understands that, why are you still denying the obvious.


wrote in message
oups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
I am glad you did not challenge the fact that boat magazines and those
that
write for them have sold their soul to boat builders and suppliers.


I will let folks decide, for themselves, whether this particular bit
extracted from the rest of your easily disproven charges and "facts" is
any less BS than the others.

You're always welcome, at any time, to point out any technical
inaccuracies in something I post about a boat.

Harry,
You forgot to tell him about the 1.5 million you made on Microsoft stock.


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Tim wrote:
Well, I've seen you do plenty of putting down others, but never saw
anything about your job or how you make your living

"but they are quick to put down what many other

people
who are more open about themselves do for a living...."



Mr. Krause....does that also include atl_m who started the thread?




Nope, it does not. I'm not at all ashamed of what I do for a living.



HErtvik and several others here are embarrassed about what they do for a
living, and won't tell us.

My earned income comes from several sources: consulting contracts with
labor unions and affiliated organizations and speculation on improved and
unimproved "residential" real estate. I also earn a few bucks with an
occasional magazine piece on construction, especially as it relates to
skilled workers of the present or past.

I also have a journeyman's card in a skilled construction trade, but I'm
an inactive member of that particular union.



If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

I'm a BSA.

http://tinyurl.com/ddsux

wrote in message
oups.com...
http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html

Harry,
I noticed that you did not disagree that with my statement that the articles
and reviews Chuck writes are fluff pieces so the magazine can sell the
builder ad space.


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Yo Ho wrote:
Chuck,
Everyone who has ever made a post concerning your fluff PR articles have
stated they understand they are PR fluff to sell ads. Even Harry and
bass understands that, why are you still denying the obvious.

You don't speak for me, Smithers.

I read Chuck's pieces because he's a good writer and typically gets aboard
larger boats I'll never see but have a voyeur's interest in, as it were. I
learn a bit from Chuck's articles. If I wanted to buy one of the boats
he's discussed, I'd spend a considerable amount of time researching it,
and I'd arrange a factory visit. I did that with all the boats I've owned
in the last two decades.

One boat Chuck wrote about really interested me, the Camano 31, a
mini-trawler that can get up and move. His was the second article on the
boat I read, and his findings were similar to those of the other article.

I find it fascinating that you and several others here "knock" Chuck and
his articles, when there is no evidence that any of you are gainfully
employed in anything that does any good for anyone. Chuck's work makes me
smile. I have a feeling whatyou and Hertvik and several others do here
would make me puke.

Of course, what you fellows do for a living remains a state secret, right?

This morning, I noted that I recognized you with your 50th handle
immediately, because:

An asshole by any name still smells like ****.

That would be you, Smithers.







--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Tim wrote:
Well, I've seen you do plenty of putting down others, but never saw
anything about your job or how you make your living

"but they are quick to put down what many other

people
who are more open about themselves do for a living...."



Mr. Krause....does that also include atl_m who started the thread?




Nope, it does not. I'm not at all ashamed of what I do for a living.

Sure you are, just as you are ashamed of what your wife does for a living
and had to fabricate a double doctorate degree story.






HErt and several others here are embarrassed about what they do for a
living, and won't tell us.

The president of the "Obsessed with JimH" club brings me into a discussion
with someone else once again. How cute.

Why should I be embarrassed about what I do for a living? It has provided
me with a great income and respect in my field.

And why should I tell you what I do? You and Chuck Gould are proven
internet stalkers and the more you know about someone the more you use it
against them.



My earned income comes from several sources: consulting contracts with
labor unions and affiliated organizations and speculation on improved and
unimproved "residential" real estate. I also earn a few bucks with an
occasional magazine piece on construction, especially as it relates to
skilled workers of the present or past.

I also have a journeyman's card in a skilled construction trade, but I'm
an inactive member of that particular union.


How's the fishing lately Krause? I see John caught you in another big lie,
this time about a fishing trip you recently reported on (see the thread "25
fish later"). Using a sock puppet to support your lie and getting caught.
Sort of like when you did the same think with your imaginary custom made 36
foot lobster boat.

It must really suck being you Krause.

Harry,
No one believes any of your statements concerning your boats, your income,
what jobs you do or don't do, what your wife's profession is or what side of
the bed you wake up on.

Even Chuck knows all of your personal info is BS.


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Yo Ho wrote:
Harry,
You forgot to tell him about the 1.5 million you made on Microsoft stock.


Define "earned income."





--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Tim wrote:
Well, I've seen you do plenty of putting down others, but never saw
anything about your job or how you make your living

"but they are quick to put down what many other

people
who are more open about themselves do for a living...."



Mr. Krause....does that also include atl_m who started the thread?




Nope, it does not. I'm not at all ashamed of what I do for a living.

Sure you are, just as you are ashamed of what your wife does for a living
and had to fabricate a double doctorate degree story.






HErt and several others here are embarrassed about what they do for a
living, and won't tell us.

The president of the "Obsessed with JimH" club brings me into a discussion
with someone else once again. How cute.

Why should I be embarrassed about what I do for a living? It has provided
me with a great income and respect in my field.

And why should I tell you what I do? You and Chuck Gould are proven
internet stalkers and the more you know about someone the more you use it
against them.

Which is why I don't either...though anybody with half a brain could figure
it out.....which excludes krause, kevin and co.





My earned income comes from several sources: consulting contracts with
labor unions and affiliated organizations and speculation on improved
and
unimproved "residential" real estate. I also earn a few bucks with an
occasional magazine piece on construction, especially as it relates to
skilled workers of the present or past.

I also have a journeyman's card in a skilled construction trade, but
I'm
an inactive member of that particular union.


How's the fishing lately Krause? I see John caught you in another big
lie,
this time about a fishing trip you recently reported on (see the thread
"25
fish later"). Using a sock puppet to support your lie and getting caught.
Sort of like when you did the same think with your imaginary custom made
36
foot lobster boat.

It must really suck being you Krause.

Harry,
Does your wife know you were so embarrassed about her being an on staff
social worker for the Bricklayers Union, you had to fabricate a story about
her being a MD with a PHD?

Why can't you accept her just the way she is?



"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:


HErt and several others here are embarrassed about what they do for a
living, and won't tell us.


Why should I be embarrassed about what I do for a living? It has
provided me with a great income and respect in my field.


What do you do for a living, Hertvik?


And why should I tell you what I do? You and Chuck Gould are proven
internet stalkers and the more you know about someone the more you use it
against them.


How is disclosing what you do for a living going to reveal any personal
information about you? I mean, let's say you sold men's suits, an
honorable way to make a living. Why would your saying you are a clothier
tell us anything personal about you?

My guess is that you're just embarrassed by what you do. Or did.


How's the fishing lately Krause?

OK. That's all it ever is in Chesapeake Bay.



I see John caught you in another big lie,
this time about a fishing trip you recently reported on (see the thread
"25 fish later"). Using a sock puppet to support your lie and getting
caught. Sort of like when you did the same think with your imaginary
custom made 36 foot lobster boat.


A sock puppet? I used my alternate email address, to leave Herring a clue.
The alternate email address I use here. If I were operating sub rosa, I
would have used a new email address. D'oh.

I trolled for a Herring fish and I caught one on the first sweep.

By the way, was your house designed by a committee? What is with that
garage treatment and the silly little gazebo on the other end?








--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

Why the foul language? I am always so civil when I chat with you?



"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Yo Ho wrote:
Harry,


Smithers:

Despite the fact that you have once again changed your handle,
you cannot get away from the fact that whatever you call yourself,
you're still an asshole and you still smell like ****.


--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

Harry,
I have always treated you much nicer than you treat others.
I also never use foul language. I always thought it foul language made one
uneducated. Don't you?

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Yo Ho wrote:
Why the foul language? I am always so civil when I chat with you?

Use your real name and play like a nice boy, and you'll be treated the
same.

Otherwise:

Smithers:

Despite the fact that you have once again changed your handle,
you cannot get away from the fact that whatever you call yourself,
you're still an asshole and you still smell like ****.





--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

edit (hit the wrong button while on the phone)

Harry,
I have always treated you much nicer than you treat others.
I also never use foul language. I always thought foul language made one
look uneducated and borish. Don't you?

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Yo Ho wrote:
Why the foul language? I am always so civil when I chat with you?

Use your real name and play like a nice boy, and you'll be treated the
same.

Otherwise:

Smithers:

Despite the fact that you have once again changed your handle,
you cannot get away from the fact that whatever you call yourself,
you're still an asshole and you still smell like ****.





--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:40:26 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

*JimH* wrote:


HErt and several others here are embarrassed about what they do for a
living, and won't tell us.


Why should I be embarrassed about what I do for a living? It has provided
me with a great income and respect in my field.


What do you do for a living, Hertvik?


And why should I tell you what I do? You and Chuck Gould are proven
internet stalkers and the more you know about someone the more you use it
against them.


How is disclosing what you do for a living going to reveal any personal
information about you? I mean, let's say you sold men's suits, an
honorable way to make a living. Why would your saying you are a clothier
tell us anything personal about you?

My guess is that you're just embarrassed by what you do. Or did.


How's the fishing lately Krause?

OK. That's all it ever is in Chesapeake Bay.



I see John caught you in another big lie,
this time about a fishing trip you recently reported on (see the thread "25
fish later"). Using a sock puppet to support your lie and getting caught.
Sort of like when you did the same think with your imaginary custom made 36
foot lobster boat.


A sock puppet? I used my alternate email address, to leave Herring a
clue. The alternate email address I use here. If I were operating sub
rosa, I would have used a new email address. D'oh.

I trolled for a Herring fish and I caught one on the first sweep.

By the way, was your house designed by a committee? What is with that
garage treatment and the silly little gazebo on the other end?

Hee, hee!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:40:26 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

*JimH* wrote:


HErt and several others here are embarrassed about what they do for a
living, and won't tell us.


Why should I be embarrassed about what I do for a living? It has
provided
me with a great income and respect in my field.


What do you do for a living, Her?


And why should I tell you what I do? You and Chuck Gould are proven
internet stalkers and the more you know about someone the more you use
it
against them.


How is disclosing what you do for a living going to reveal any personal
information about you? I mean, let's say you sold men's suits, an
honorable way to make a living. Why would your saying you are a clothier
tell us anything personal about you?

My guess is that you're just embarrassed by what you do. Or did.


How's the fishing lately Krause?

OK. That's all it ever is in Chesapeake Bay.



I see John caught you in another big lie,
this time about a fishing trip you recently reported on (see the thread
"25
fish later"). Using a sock puppet to support your lie and getting
caught.
Sort of like when you did the same think with your imaginary custom made
36
foot lobster boat.


A sock puppet? I used my alternate email address, to leave Herring a
clue. The alternate email address I use here. If I were operating sub
rosa, I would have used a new email address. D'oh.

I trolled for a Herring fish and I caught one on the first sweep.

By the way, was your house designed by a committee? What is with that
garage treatment and the silly little gazebo on the other end?

Hee, hee!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Indeed. And once again we have Krause admitting he stalked me to the point
of getting a picture of my house, gazebo and all. Chuck Gould has now
joined you in the internet stalking game so now you have a team.

How sad it must be to have to live as Harry Krause......a man who has to
fabricate stories in a remote boating NG about his boat, his house, his
wife, her job and now fishing stories.

Sad.

Harry,
I have never published your home phone number or your wife's work number.
Why do you think it is cute to posts all this personal info about JimH's
life?


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:

Indeed. And once again we have Krause admitting he stalked me to the
point of getting a picture of my house, gazebo and all. Chuck Gould has
now joined you in the internet stalking game so now you have a team.



A photo of your house is available on your county assessor's website,
crap-for-brains. It's sorta like having your name and phone number in the
phone book.

Now, back to the question: who designed your house, Rube Goldberg?




--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:

Indeed. And once again we have Krause admitting he stalked me to the
point of getting a picture of my house, gazebo and all. Chuck Gould has
now joined you in the internet stalking game so now you have a team.



A photo of your house is available on your county assessor's website,
crap-for-brains. It's sorta like having your name and phone number in the
phone book.

But it takes an internet stalker to want to take the time and find it.



Now, back to the question: who designed your house, Rube Goldberg?


I can understand how you would be envious of my house....3 car garage,
finished basement, over 3,000 square feet, upscale neighborhood, less than a
mile from the Lake.

So is your trailer with an asphalt drive the one or two bedroom edition?

The problem with posting person info is it can get out of hand. I heard
of someone posting name and telephone numbers in sex ads just to get back at
someone who was posting personal info on the web. Chuck posted his number
in rec.boats, if someone posted his phone number in a sex ad it could be a
real pain in the butt.

It is best to keep personal info personal.




"Yo Ho" wrote in message
...
Harry,
I have never published your home phone number or your wife's work number.
Why do you think it is cute to posts all this personal info about JimH's
life?


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:

Indeed. And once again we have Krause admitting he stalked me to the
point of getting a picture of my house, gazebo and all. Chuck Gould has
now joined you in the internet stalking game so now you have a team.



A photo of your house is available on your county assessor's website,
crap-for-brains. It's sorta like having your name and phone number in the
phone book.

Now, back to the question: who designed your house, Rube Goldberg?




--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
I've not posted your name, address, phone number, or SSN, either.

Yes, but if you knew it I am sure you would have. I know you phone
numbers, but have keep them off the internet..

Why would I want to email you? Doesn't make any sense at all.


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Yo Ho wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

I've not posted your name, address, phone number, or SSN, either.


Yes, but if you knew it I am sure you would have. I know you phone
numbers, but have keep them off the internet..

If you knew what I know about you, you'd have a heart attack, fella.
It's only my good nature...

Tell you what, you email me what you think are my phone numbers, and I
will verify.

My gmail address here is for real.




--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

"Yo Ho" wrote in message
...
Why would I want to email you? Doesn't make any sense at all.


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Yo Ho wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

I've not posted your name, address, phone number, or SSN, either.


Yes, but if you knew it I am sure you would have. I know you phone
numbers, but have keep them off the internet..

If you knew what I know about you, you'd have a heart attack, fella.
It's only my good nature...



More proof that Harry Krause is indeed an internet stalker. Chuck Gould
proved it today to everyone by finding then posting my address and phone
number here.

Why the need to collect personal data on folks here Krause? Do you get your
jollies from it?

Which is exactly why I would not give Krause my email address. The guy is
certifiable.


"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

"Yo Ho" wrote in message
...
Why would I want to email you? Doesn't make any sense at all.


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Yo Ho wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

I've not posted your name, address, phone number, or SSN, either.


Yes, but if you knew it I am sure you would have. I know you phone
numbers, but have keep them off the internet..

If you knew what I know about you, you'd have a heart attack, fella.
It's only my good nature...



More proof that Harry Krause is indeed an internet stalker. Chuck Gould
proved it today to everyone by finding then posting my address and phone
number here.

Why the need to collect personal data on folks here Krause? Do you get
your jollies from it?

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:18:20 -0400, "Yo Ho" wrote:

Why would I want to email you? Doesn't make any sense at all.


He likes sending back-channels, but if you use mailwasher you can have it
bounced back at him from the ISP.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:21:25 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


"Yo Ho" wrote in message
...
Why would I want to email you? Doesn't make any sense at all.


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Yo Ho wrote:
"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...

I've not posted your name, address, phone number, or SSN, either.


Yes, but if you knew it I am sure you would have. I know you phone
numbers, but have keep them off the internet..

If you knew what I know about you, you'd have a heart attack, fella.
It's only my good nature...



More proof that Harry Krause is indeed an internet stalker. Chuck Gould
proved it today to everyone by finding then posting my address and phone
number here.

Why the need to collect personal data on folks here Krause? Do you get your
jollies from it?


Now Krause is posting his hate-mail on a Chesapeake Bay fishing forum. Getting
caught constantly has got to be a bitch!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

JimH "moped", (sorry, couldn't resist that one!)


Indeed. And once again we have Krause admitting he stalked me to the point
of getting a picture of my house, gazebo and all. Chuck Gould has now
joined you in the internet stalking game so now you have a team.

How sad it must be to have to live as Harry Krause......a man who has to
fabricate stories in a remote boating NG about his boat, his house, his
wife, her job and now fishing stories.

Sad.


Golly and gee whiz, JimH.

Let's take a deep breath for a minute and evaluate your stalking
charges.

You placed an advertisement for a Moped (being retired from the "swarm
and destroy" moped army) on a publicly accessible site on the internet,
and furnished a photo that shows a corner of your front porch and some
brown patches on your front lawn as well as the used Moped in question.
You then characterize anybody who reports viewing your publicly
displayed advertisement or calls the attention of others to the ad as a
"stalker"?? Get thou real.

Here's a newsflash for you, JimH. A stalker would be somebody who digs
up and publicizes information that you haven't already publicly
divulged. If you put an aerial photo of your house on the internet, or
a photo of your moped, you surrender your expectation of privacy
regarding the size and location of your home or your membership in the
"Swarm and Destroy" Moped Army. That may be a more sophisticated
concept than your perpetual anger will allow you to understand, but you
might reconsider your definition of "stalking".

wrote in message
oups.com...
JimH "moped", (sorry, couldn't resist that one!)


Indeed. And once again we have Krause admitting he stalked me to the
point
of getting a picture of my house, gazebo and all. Chuck Gould has now
joined you in the internet stalking game so now you have a team.

How sad it must be to have to live as Harry Krause......a man who has to
fabricate stories in a remote boating NG about his boat, his house, his
wife, her job and now fishing stories.

Sad.


Golly and gee whiz, JimH.

snip

You took the time to find the ad I placed for my sons moped. You took the
time to post it here knowing it contained my address and phone number.

It was deliberate.

You are a stalker and now join the likes of Harry Krause.

Happy now Chuck?

You are pathetic.

Yo Ho wrote:
Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?



You certainly are predictable. You are now charging that I published
home information about JimH? This is, of course, after being forced to
admit that your earlier charge (publishing a phone number) was totally
fabricated BS.

I provided a link to a photoclassified ad on the "Swarn and Destroy
Moped Army" website. Do you consider the photo of the brown spots on
Jim's lawn and the corner of his front porch "home information"? Even
if it is, JimH is the party who placed it on a publicly accessible site
on the internet, not I.

wrote in message
oups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?



You certainly are predictable. You are now charging that I published
home information about JimH?

Yes, you did. You are a worthless piece of **** Chuck. You now join Harry
Krause on the list of internet stalkers of rec.boats.

Chuck,
I hope people give you as much respect as you deserve.


wrote in message
oups.com...


Yo Ho wrote:
Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?



You certainly are predictable. You are now charging that I published
home information about JimH? This is, of course, after being forced to
admit that your earlier charge (publishing a phone number) was totally
fabricated BS.

I provided a link to a photoclassified ad on the "Swarn and Destroy
Moped Army" website. Do you consider the photo of the brown spots on
Jim's lawn and the corner of his front porch "home information"? Even
if it is, JimH is the party who placed it on a publicly accessible site
on the internet, not I.

Which is none. Chuck Gould is an internet stalking piece of garbage. He
proved that today.


"Yo Ho" wrote in message
...
Chuck,
I hope people give you as much respect as you deserve.

JimH moped:


You took the time to find the ad I placed for my sons moped. You took the
time to post it here knowing it contained my address and phone number.

It was deliberate.

You are a stalker and now join the likes of Harry Krause.

Happy now Chuck?

You are pathetic.

Perhaps your perpetual anger will eventually subside to the point where
you will concede that the link to the ad you placed on the internet
does *not* contain your address and phone number as you claim above.
Anybody who clicked on the link can see very clearly that you are
making up crap, again, to try an bolster yet another of your weak
positions. Isn't that just a general insult to the intelligence of
anybody reading your post, or is it that you realize the group you are
hoping to appeal to has a very low threshold for credibilty?

Incidentally, "you are a stalker" and "you are pathetic" fall into the
category of those personal remarks you deny making.

What was the reason for publishing this personal information?


wrote in message
oups.com...
JimH moped:


You took the time to find the ad I placed for my sons moped. You took
the
time to post it here knowing it contained my address and phone number.

It was deliberate.

You are a stalker and now join the likes of Harry Krause.

Happy now Chuck?

You are pathetic.

Perhaps your perpetual anger will eventually subside to the point where
you will concede that the link to the ad you placed on the internet
does *not* contain your address and phone number as you claim above.
Anybody who clicked on the link can see very clearly that you are
making up crap, again, to try an bolster yet another of your weak
positions. Isn't that just a general insult to the intelligence of
anybody reading your post, or is it that you realize the group you are
hoping to appeal to has a very low threshold for credibilty?

Incidentally, "you are a stalker" and "you are pathetic" fall into the
category of those personal remarks you deny making.