| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
PING: JimH
I've asked this question over and over, but you don't answer it, so I
take it that you don't see it. You insist on calling me Kevin, I've told you over and over that I'm not. So, will you be a man and give me an apology when you find out for a fact that my name isn't Kevin, or will you remain childish and foolish? I doubt you'll even be man enough to ANSWER! |
How in the world can you prove that the person who posts in rec.boats under
the handles JimDandy, Basskisser, OnLanier, atl_man2, knoble@gmail and atl_cad are not Kevin Noble? wrote in message oups.com... I've asked this question over and over, but you don't answer it, so I take it that you don't see it. You insist on calling me Kevin, I've told you over and over that I'm not. So, will you be a man and give me an apology when you find out for a fact that my name isn't Kevin, or will you remain childish and foolish? I doubt you'll even be man enough to ANSWER! |
Newsgroup Reader wrote: How in the world can you prove that the person who posts in rec.boats under the handles JimDandy, Basskisser, OnLanier, atl_man2, knoble@gmail and atl_cad are not Kevin Noble? Simply, I can prove that *I'm* not Kevin Noble quite easily, Smithers. |
Kevin,
Try to follow this logic, how will anyone know that the person showing proof he is not Kevin Noble, is you? Don't you think it is amazing that Kevin and you both graduated from the same high school and had a sister in law dieing from cancer in the same Florida city? Does Kevin know you were using knoble for your gmail account? wrote in message ups.com... Newsgroup Reader wrote: How in the world can you prove that the person who posts in rec.boats under the handles JimDandy, Basskisser, OnLanier, atl_man2, knoble@gmail and atl_cad are not Kevin Noble? Simply, I can prove that *I'm* not Kevin Noble quite easily, Smithers. |
That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question.
"Newsgroup Reader" wrote in message ... Kevin, Try to follow this logic, how will anyone know that the person showing proof he is not Kevin Noble, is you? Don't you think it is amazing that Kevin and you both graduated from the same high school and had a sister in law dieing from cancer in the same Florida city? Does Kevin know you were using knoble for your gmail account? wrote in message ups.com... Newsgroup Reader wrote: How in the world can you prove that the person who posts in rec.boats under the handles JimDandy, Basskisser, OnLanier, atl_man2, knoble@gmail and atl_cad are not Kevin Noble? Simply, I can prove that *I'm* not Kevin Noble quite easily, Smithers. |
Newsgroup Reader wrote: Kevin, Try to follow this logic, how will anyone know that the person showing proof he is not Kevin Noble, is you? Don't you think it is amazing that Kevin and you both graduated from the same high school and had a sister in law dieing from cancer in the same Florida city? Does Kevin know you were using knoble for your gmail account? Ah, that's just the common belief of a few (you for one) people here, and is filled with flaws, and easily proven. EASILY. That's all you need to know! When I prove that I'm not Kevin Noble, will YOU be man enough to apologize?? |
*JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. |
wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. |
If you prove you are not Kevin Noble, I will acknowledge that. Since I do
not think being Kevin Noble is necessarily a bad thing, I see no reason to apologize, but you can take my acknowledgement as an apology if you prefer. Now tell us how you plan on proving you are not Kevin Noble. wrote in message oups.com... Newsgroup Reader wrote: Kevin, Try to follow this logic, how will anyone know that the person showing proof he is not Kevin Noble, is you? Don't you think it is amazing that Kevin and you both graduated from the same high school and had a sister in law dieing from cancer in the same Florida city? Does Kevin know you were using knoble for your gmail account? Ah, that's just the common belief of a few (you for one) people here, and is filled with flaws, and easily proven. EASILY. That's all you need to know! When I prove that I'm not Kevin Noble, will YOU be man enough to apologize?? |
PS - If you are able to prove you are not Kevin Noble, I definitely will
apologize to Kevin for thinking he and Basskisser were one and the same. wrote in message oups.com... Newsgroup Reader wrote: Kevin, Try to follow this logic, how will anyone know that the person showing proof he is not Kevin Noble, is you? Don't you think it is amazing that Kevin and you both graduated from the same high school and had a sister in law dieing from cancer in the same Florida city? Does Kevin know you were using knoble for your gmail account? Ah, that's just the common belief of a few (you for one) people here, and is filled with flaws, and easily proven. EASILY. That's all you need to know! When I prove that I'm not Kevin Noble, will YOU be man enough to apologize?? |
Newsgroup Reader wrote: If you prove you are not Kevin Noble, I will acknowledge that. Since I do not think being Kevin Noble is necessarily a bad thing, I see no reason to apologize, but you can take my acknowledgement as an apology if you prefer. Now tell us how you plan on proving you are not Kevin Noble. The apology wouldn't be because being Kevin Noble is "necessarily a bad thing", it would be because you WRONGLY ASSumed I was he, just like Jim, and when, after being told over and over and over that he and I are two completely different people, you and Jim still WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin Noble. You'll find out in due time how I'll prove to you I'm not Kevin Noble. |
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin. It would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him, that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin, and are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little **** stain? Grow up. |
wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin. It would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him, that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin, and are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little **** stain? Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. |
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin. It would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him, that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin, and are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little **** stain? Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. See, you ignorant little twit? If you're man enough to call me Kevin, be ****ing man enough to apologize when you're shown to be wrong!!! That's all. Are you such a childish little ****ing boy that you have to resort to idiocy in every single post you make? Oh, unless it's your two masters Fritz and JohnH. You really should quit, you act like you're their private little **** boy. Grow up. |
wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin. It would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him, that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin, and are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little **** stain? Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. See, you ignorant little twit? If you're man enough to call me Kevin, be ****ing man enough to apologize when you're shown to be wrong!!! That's all. Are you such a childish little ****ing boy that you have to resort to idiocy in every single post you make? Oh, unless it's your two masters Fritz and JohnH. You really should quit, you act like you're their private little **** boy. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. |
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin. It would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him, that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin, and are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little **** stain? Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. See, you ignorant little twit? If you're man enough to call me Kevin, be ****ing man enough to apologize when you're shown to be wrong!!! That's all. Are you such a childish little ****ing boy that you have to resort to idiocy in every single post you make? Oh, unless it's your two masters Fritz and JohnH. You really should quit, you act like you're their private little **** boy. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. My god you are stupid. And I mean it, I've given you a lot of slack, but, after telling you and telling you, it still doesn't get through to your ignorant mind. Try this, MAYBE you'll realize where you are wrong. Take a good, long hard look, Jim, this will take a couple of minutes of concentration, and I know you're dumb, but try. Take all of the **** that you THINK you know about me. Now, for someone to come to a conclusion like you have, you'd have to have at least ONE PIECE of DEFINITIVE evidence, would you not? What IS that? Hmm, what you don't HAVE it? All you have it what your suck buddies have told you, and speculation.....well, you ignoramus, that's your answer!!!! |
wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin. It would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him, that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin, and are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little **** stain? Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. See, you ignorant little twit? If you're man enough to call me Kevin, be ****ing man enough to apologize when you're shown to be wrong!!! That's all. Are you such a childish little ****ing boy that you have to resort to idiocy in every single post you make? Oh, unless it's your two masters Fritz and JohnH. You really should quit, you act like you're their private little **** boy. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. My god you are stupid. And I mean it, I've given you a lot of slack, but, after telling you and telling you, it still doesn't get through to your ignorant mind. Try this, MAYBE you'll realize where you are wrong. Take a good, long hard look, Jim, this will take a couple of minutes of concentration, and I know you're dumb, but try. Take all of the **** that you THINK you know about me. Now, for someone to come to a conclusion like you have, you'd have to have at least ONE PIECE of DEFINITIVE evidence, would you not? What IS that? Hmm, what you don't HAVE it? All you have it what your suck buddies have told you, and speculation.....well, you ignoramus, that's your answer!!!! Whatever you say Kevin. Potty mouth. |
If you want me to apologize I will do it, now prove it.
wrote in message ups.com... Newsgroup Reader wrote: If you prove you are not Kevin Noble, I will acknowledge that. Since I do not think being Kevin Noble is necessarily a bad thing, I see no reason to apologize, but you can take my acknowledgement as an apology if you prefer. Now tell us how you plan on proving you are not Kevin Noble. The apology wouldn't be because being Kevin Noble is "necessarily a bad thing", it would be because you WRONGLY ASSumed I was he, just like Jim, and when, after being told over and over and over that he and I are two completely different people, you and Jim still WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin Noble. You'll find out in due time how I'll prove to you I'm not Kevin Noble. |
Kevin,
Why don't you just prove it. You know what they say, "the proof is in the pudding" and some thing about "bull**** walks" .. wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin. It would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him, that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin, and are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little **** stain? Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. See, you ignorant little twit? If you're man enough to call me Kevin, be ****ing man enough to apologize when you're shown to be wrong!!! That's all. Are you such a childish little ****ing boy that you have to resort to idiocy in every single post you make? Oh, unless it's your two masters Fritz and JohnH. You really should quit, you act like you're their private little **** boy. Grow up. |
"*JimH*" wrote in message ... wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. Kevin determining who is a 'man' priceless |
|
|
|
Wow, it's amazing the paranoia of some on here coming from some of the
liberal left! at times, it is truely noteworthy...... What was that one line in the song "I'm not in love" by 10cc? "Big boys don't cry, big boys don't cry......" LOL Jun 27, 9:37 am show options Newsgroups: rec.boats From: - Find messages by this author Date: 27 Jun 2005 06:37:44 -0700 Local: Mon,Jun 27 2005 9:37 am Subject: PING: JimH Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse I've asked this question over and over, but you don't answer it, so I take it that you don't see it. You insist on calling me Kevin, I've told you over and over that I'm not. So, will you be a man and give me an apology when you find out for a fact that my name isn't Kevin, or will you remain childish and foolish? I doubt you'll even be man enough to ANSWER! Simply, I can prove that *I'm* not Kevin Noble quite easily, Smithers. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin. It would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him, that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin, and are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little **** stain? Grow up. See, you ignorant little twit? If you're man enough to call me Kevin, be ****ing man enough to apologize when you're shown to be wrong!!! That's all. Are you such a childish little ****ing boy that you have to resort to idiocy in every single post you make? Oh, unless it's your two masters Fritz and JohnH. You really should quit, you act like you're their private little **** boy. Grow up. My god you are stupid. And I mean it, I've given you a lot of slack, but, after telling you and telling you, it still doesn't get through to your ignorant mind. Try this, MAYBE you'll realize where you are wrong. Take a good, long hard look, Jim, this will take a couple of minutes of concentration, and I know you're dumb, but try. Take all of the **** that you THINK you know about me. Now, for someone to come to a conclusion like you have, you'd have to have at least ONE PIECE of DEFINITIVE evidence, would you not? What IS that? Hmm, what you don't HAVE it? All you have it what your suck buddies have told you, and speculation.....well, you ignoramus, that's your answer!!!! Ah, that's just the common belief of a few (you for one) people here, and is filled with flaws, and easily proven. EASILY. That's all you need to know! When I prove that I'm not Kevin Noble, will YOU be man enough to apologize?? The apology wouldn't be because being Kevin Noble is "necessarily a bad thing", it would be because you WRONGLY ASSumed I was he, just like Jim, and when, after being told over and over and over that he and I are two completely different people, you and Jim still WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin Noble. You'll find out in due time how I'll prove to you I'm not Kevin Noble. ......." |
|
wrote in message oups.com... John H wrote: On 27 Jun 2005 11:52:48 -0700, wrote: Newsgroup Reader wrote: If you prove you are not Kevin Noble, I will acknowledge that. Since I do not think being Kevin Noble is necessarily a bad thing, I see no reason to apologize, but you can take my acknowledgement as an apology if you prefer. Now tell us how you plan on proving you are not Kevin Noble. The apology wouldn't be because being Kevin Noble is "necessarily a bad thing", it would be because you WRONGLY ASSumed I was he, just like Jim, and when, after being told over and over and over that he and I are two completely different people, you and Jim still WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin Noble. You'll find out in due time how I'll prove to you I'm not Kevin Noble. In what ways are you and Kevin different? "Completely different" is a pretty broad statement! -- John H Get the idea, nitwit? 2nd post of the day and 1 insult to a NG member already. |
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin. It would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him, that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin, and are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little **** stain? Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. See, you ignorant little twit? If you're man enough to call me Kevin, be ****ing man enough to apologize when you're shown to be wrong!!! That's all. Are you such a childish little ****ing boy that you have to resort to idiocy in every single post you make? Oh, unless it's your two masters Fritz and JohnH. You really should quit, you act like you're their private little **** boy. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. My god you are stupid. And I mean it, I've given you a lot of slack, but, after telling you and telling you, it still doesn't get through to your ignorant mind. Try this, MAYBE you'll realize where you are wrong. Take a good, long hard look, Jim, this will take a couple of minutes of concentration, and I know you're dumb, but try. Take all of the **** that you THINK you know about me. Now, for someone to come to a conclusion like you have, you'd have to have at least ONE PIECE of DEFINITIVE evidence, would you not? What IS that? Hmm, what you don't HAVE it? All you have it what your suck buddies have told you, and speculation.....well, you ignoramus, that's your answer!!!! Whatever you say Kevin. Potty mouth. Awe....the whining is hilarious. What ever happened to you vow to not insult and tell lies, Jim? Another lie. |
wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin. It would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him, that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin, and are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little **** stain? Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. See, you ignorant little twit? If you're man enough to call me Kevin, be ****ing man enough to apologize when you're shown to be wrong!!! That's all. Are you such a childish little ****ing boy that you have to resort to idiocy in every single post you make? Oh, unless it's your two masters Fritz and JohnH. You really should quit, you act like you're their private little **** boy. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. My god you are stupid. And I mean it, I've given you a lot of slack, but, after telling you and telling you, it still doesn't get through to your ignorant mind. Try this, MAYBE you'll realize where you are wrong. Take a good, long hard look, Jim, this will take a couple of minutes of concentration, and I know you're dumb, but try. Take all of the **** that you THINK you know about me. Now, for someone to come to a conclusion like you have, you'd have to have at least ONE PIECE of DEFINITIVE evidence, would you not? What IS that? Hmm, what you don't HAVE it? All you have it what your suck buddies have told you, and speculation.....well, you ignoramus, that's your answer!!!! Whatever you say Kevin. Potty mouth. Awe....the whining is hilarious. What ever happened to you vow to not insult and tell lies, Jim? Another lie. Whatever you say Kevin. |
Newsgroup Reader wrote: Kevin, Why don't you just prove it. You know what they say, "the proof is in the pudding" and some thing about "bull**** walks" Because I want ALL of the idiots who think I'm him to be on board with an apology to me. Simple as that. |
"John H" wrote in message ... On 27 Jun 2005 12:43:44 -0700, wrote: *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin. It would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him, that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin, and are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little **** stain? Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. See, you ignorant little twit? If you're man enough to call me Kevin, be ****ing man enough to apologize when you're shown to be wrong!!! That's all. Are you such a childish little ****ing boy that you have to resort to idiocy in every single post you make? Oh, unless it's your two masters Fritz and JohnH. You really should quit, you act like you're their private little **** boy. Grow up. I'm no one's master. Now it sounds like you're berating someone for not believing the proof you have yet to show. Or, am I missing something? Kevin's name calling hypocrisy is showing :-) He's been acting like this since his bitch slapping. -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
"John H" wrote in message ... On 27 Jun 2005 11:52:48 -0700, wrote: Newsgroup Reader wrote: If you prove you are not Kevin Noble, I will acknowledge that. Since I do not think being Kevin Noble is necessarily a bad thing, I see no reason to apologize, but you can take my acknowledgement as an apology if you prefer. Now tell us how you plan on proving you are not Kevin Noble. The apology wouldn't be because being Kevin Noble is "necessarily a bad thing", it would be because you WRONGLY ASSumed I was he, just like Jim, and when, after being told over and over and over that he and I are two completely different people, you and Jim still WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin Noble. You'll find out in due time how I'll prove to you I'm not Kevin Noble. In what ways are you and Kevin different? "Completely different" is a pretty broad statement! Then the whole NG will apology to Kevin Noble for believing he was the "king of the NG idiots" On the other hand, asslicker will still hold the title LMAO -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
Man enough to call me Kevin.."whoooooooooo"
I apologize when I'm wron, but so far, nothing to be wrong about. "be f*cking man ...childish little f*cking boy...you're their private little f*ck boy" Hmmm, seems most people use this type of language because they either can't think of anything more intellegent to say, or it makes them feel reallly big...LOL "Grow up. " Ah, maturity in its greatest form.... |
Kevin,
We eagerly await your proof. "John H" wrote in message ... On 27 Jun 2005 11:52:48 -0700, wrote: Newsgroup Reader wrote: If you prove you are not Kevin Noble, I will acknowledge that. Since I do not think being Kevin Noble is necessarily a bad thing, I see no reason to apologize, but you can take my acknowledgement as an apology if you prefer. Now tell us how you plan on proving you are not Kevin Noble. The apology wouldn't be because being Kevin Noble is "necessarily a bad thing", it would be because you WRONGLY ASSumed I was he, just like Jim, and when, after being told over and over and over that he and I are two completely different people, you and Jim still WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin Noble. You'll find out in due time how I'll prove to you I'm not Kevin Noble. In what ways are you and Kevin different? "Completely different" is a pretty broad statement! -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... John H wrote: On 27 Jun 2005 11:52:48 -0700, wrote: Newsgroup Reader wrote: If you prove you are not Kevin Noble, I will acknowledge that. Since I do not think being Kevin Noble is necessarily a bad thing, I see no reason to apologize, but you can take my acknowledgement as an apology if you prefer. Now tell us how you plan on proving you are not Kevin Noble. The apology wouldn't be because being Kevin Noble is "necessarily a bad thing", it would be because you WRONGLY ASSumed I was he, just like Jim, and when, after being told over and over and over that he and I are two completely different people, you and Jim still WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin Noble. You'll find out in due time how I'll prove to you I'm not Kevin Noble. In what ways are you and Kevin different? "Completely different" is a pretty broad statement! -- John H Get the idea, nitwit? 2nd post of the day and 1 insult to a NG member already. WHAAAAAAA!!!! Grow up. |
Kevin,
You sound like Harry and his reason why he publishes pictures of his Parker, but keeps the Lobster Boat hidden. wrote in message oups.com... Newsgroup Reader wrote: Kevin, Why don't you just prove it. You know what they say, "the proof is in the pudding" and some thing about "bull**** walks" Because I want ALL of the idiots who think I'm him to be on board with an apology to me. Simple as that. |
*JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin. It would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him, that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin, and are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little **** stain? Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. See, you ignorant little twit? If you're man enough to call me Kevin, be ****ing man enough to apologize when you're shown to be wrong!!! That's all. Are you such a childish little ****ing boy that you have to resort to idiocy in every single post you make? Oh, unless it's your two masters Fritz and JohnH. You really should quit, you act like you're their private little **** boy. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. My god you are stupid. And I mean it, I've given you a lot of slack, but, after telling you and telling you, it still doesn't get through to your ignorant mind. Try this, MAYBE you'll realize where you are wrong. Take a good, long hard look, Jim, this will take a couple of minutes of concentration, and I know you're dumb, but try. Take all of the **** that you THINK you know about me. Now, for someone to come to a conclusion like you have, you'd have to have at least ONE PIECE of DEFINITIVE evidence, would you not? What IS that? Hmm, what you don't HAVE it? All you have it what your suck buddies have told you, and speculation.....well, you ignoramus, that's your answer!!!! Whatever you say Kevin. Potty mouth. Awe....the whining is hilarious. What ever happened to you vow to not insult and tell lies, Jim? Another lie. Whatever you say Kevin. See? I KNEW you didn't have the brain power to figure it out!!! What an idiot you are! Going to answer the ****ing question now, **** stain? If you insist on calling me Kevin, after I've told you a thousand times that I'm not him, that would mean that you have some difinitive evidence that I am him, correct, asshole? If so, what is it? Let's see it, dummy. |
Newsgroup Reader wrote: Kevin, We eagerly await your proof. I take it that you either didn't read my reply to you, or else you can't comprehend it, Smithers. |
P. Fritz wrote: "John H" wrote in message ... On 27 Jun 2005 12:43:44 -0700, wrote: *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. You see, you little asswipe, you WRONGLY insist on calling me Kevin. It would seem that, because of your ignorant stance on calling me him, that you could at least be half of a man and apologize when you find out I'm not him. It would be such a big deal, but you are such an ignorant little twit that you WRONGLY INSIST on calling me Kevin, and are too dumb to know that I'm not him. Get it, you brain dead little **** stain? Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. See, you ignorant little twit? If you're man enough to call me Kevin, be ****ing man enough to apologize when you're shown to be wrong!!! That's all. Are you such a childish little ****ing boy that you have to resort to idiocy in every single post you make? Oh, unless it's your two masters Fritz and JohnH. You really should quit, you act like you're their private little **** boy. Grow up. I'm no one's master. Now it sounds like you're berating someone for not believing the proof you have yet to show. Or, am I missing something? Kevin's name calling hypocrisy is showing :-) He's been acting like this since his bitch slapping. Fritz, get this VERY straight, you punk. You would surely be very sorry the day that you EVER tried to "bitch slap" me. You are nothing but a usenet hiding little sissy boy who cuddles up to John, and Jim, and then stalks me. Grow up, you childish asshole. |
P. Fritz wrote: "*JimH*" wrote in message ... wrote in message ups.com... *JimH* wrote: That is why I have not responded to Kevin's question. You haven't responded because you aren't man enough. You don't want to know the truth, because you know that you are wrong. You are acting like a little child. You must be sure that I'm Kevin, or else you wouldn't be calling me him, correct? Well, sadly you are wrong, and I think you KNOW you're wrong, or else you'd say, sure, I'll apologize if you aren't Kevin. But, alas, like I said before, you aren't ANYWHERE NEAR A MAN. Grow up. Whatever you say Kevin. Kevin determining who is a 'man' priceless It surely isn't you, you little pussyboy. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:48 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com