Notice how that website is STILL, after all these years, ONLINE? If it

were false, Brunswick's lawyer clan would be on David Pascoe so fast
his
hat would have sailed off. They haven't and it's STILL ONLINE!

********

That's funny. You're still on line, spreading the Pascoe lie, and
Brunswick hasn't sued your hat off. Why is that? Could it be that
Brunswick has better things to do than argue with every kook that comes
along? If you believe everything simply because its online, you are one
confused guy.

Do you have any opinion about the material you viewed (assuming you
did) on the link I provided, (showing exactly how the hull in question
is built) or will you continue to spread the lie that Sea Ray hulls are
built up with "putty"?

It's too bad your SeaDoo or whatever didn't work out better for you.
It's disingenuous to report you experience as typical of a Sea Ray
"boat", and you know (or should know if you're going to presume to
render an informed opinion) that the hull on the Pascoe site is not
representative of
current production- yet you respond to a guy asking about a brand new
Sea Ray with some dubious information about a long defunct hull
standard with "see how they're made......".

I've got no problem with somebody who knows their butt from first base
expressing a negative opinion about a boat. The operative standard
should be, "Brand X boats are crap...BECAUSE (insert factual, current,
technical reason here)." What will we hear next? "All Sea Ray owners
wear too many gold chains and have small sexual organs!"? (actual
quote from a recent "classic" post from a non-boater in this NG)

Tell us, Larry, when you owned your Sea Ray, did you wear a lot of gold
chains? Do you consider yourself inadequately endowed? Assuming one
or both answers are "no", it goes to show that people who don't know
kkkrap about boats, or at least a specific boat, can post all kinds of
stuff on the internet without having their hats sued off.