| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 18 May 2004 05:16:12 +0000, Calif Bill wrote:
So the Charles Manson prosecutor has an opinion. Just not the same as the majority of the Supreme court. As the court stated, you can not change the rules in the middle of the election. You would have been happy if the rules had been changed to give Gore the election? Saying any double votes counted for the Democrat candidate, and any non-vote also counted for the Democrat? First, that's not what the Courts stated. Second, while since Iraq, I am definitely anti-Bush, at the time of the election, I had no strong feelings for either candidate. In fact, I was more intent on the process than the outcome. I was quite proud of my country, as it's citizens struggled to count every vote. Some made jokes about the dimpled or pregnant chads, but I saw citizens struggling to count every vote knowing the Presidency of this country depended on in. They were wrong. There were only nine votes that mattered. Oh, and Bugliosi isn't the only lawyer of the opinion the Supreme Court short-circuited the process. http://www.the-rule-of-law.com/archi...statement.html |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Back from vacation | General | |||
| Where to find ramp stories? | General | |||
| New one on me - Laminate Flooring | General | |||
| The Bahamas, Key West and back. | General | |||
| back with a problem now | General | |||