"basskisser" wrote in message

And how many millions of dollars did it cost the U.S. taxpayers to
find out Bill likes sex?

It cost nothing. Everyone already knew that. It cost money to establish
that Bill, among other things, obstructed justice, attempted to suborn
witnesses, possibly committed rape, and specifically and knowingly lied to
Congress, a Grand Jury, and the American public on at least seventeen
documented occasions.

"John Gaquin" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message

And how many millions of dollars did it cost the U.S. taxpayers to
find out Bill likes sex?

It cost nothing. Everyone already knew that. It cost money to establish
that Bill, among other things, obstructed justice, attempted to suborn
witnesses, possibly committed rape, and specifically and knowingly lied to
Congress, a Grand Jury, and the American public on at least seventeen
documented occasions.



It cost PLENTY, in terms of diverting the attention of legislators from
things that were actually important. Tell me - if you were an elected
official and a putz like Newt Gingrich decided to pry into parts of your
life that were none of anyone's business, what would YOU do?

Actually the last elected POTUS is still President of the USA. Just because
the AGore people tried to change the rules after the election, and did not
succeed, does not make Bush appointed.

Yes bill, you are right.. Bush was elected... by a vote of 5 to 4

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
nk.net...

Actually the last elected POTUS is still President of the USA. Just
because
the AGore people tried to change the rules after the election, and did not
succeed, does not make Bush appointed.

wrote in message
link.net...
Yes bill, you are right.. Bush was elected... by a vote of 5 to 4

That's still a plurality...so what's your point?

Wake up Noyb... That was the vote of the US Supreme Court

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

wrote in message
link.net...
Yes bill, you are right.. Bush was elected... by a vote of 5 to 4

That's still a plurality...so what's your point?

wrote in message
link.net...
Wake up Noyb... That was the vote of the US Supreme Court

No kidding. And it's still a plurality.

wrote in message
link.net...
Yes bill, you are right.. Bush was elected... by a vote of 5 to 4

"Calif Bill" wrote in message
nk.net...

Actually the last elected POTUS is still President of the USA. Just
because
the AGore people tried to change the rules after the election, and did
not
succeed, does not make Bush appointed.





And gore lost 4 to 5. and the Daley who learned to steal elections at his
daddy's feet, lost out on theft this time.

On Mon, 17 May 2004 19:15:01 +0000, Calif Bill wrote:


Actually the last elected POTUS is still President of the USA. Just
because the AGore people tried to change the rules after the election, and
did not succeed, does not make Bush appointed.

http://www.lightparty.com/Misc/NoneD...ItTreason.html

"thunder" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 17 May 2004 19:15:01 +0000, Calif Bill wrote:


Actually the last elected POTUS is still President of the USA. Just
because the AGore people tried to change the rules after the election,
and
did not succeed, does not make Bush appointed.

http://www.lightparty.com/Misc/NoneD...ItTreason.html


So the Charles Manson prosecutor has an opinion. Just not the same as the
majority of the Supreme court. As the court stated, you can not change the
rules in the middle of the election. You would have been happy if the rules
had been changed to give Gore the election? Saying any double votes counted
for the Democrat candidate, and any non-vote also counted for the Democrat?