On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:26:13 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:59:53 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats
it
is
all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of
the
highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in
rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having
dockside
conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your
sorry
ass out.


I simply don't understand your position. Initially, I made the
conscious decision not to filter people, but to filter "off topic"
content, as far as I could. If Harry chooses to post off topic I won't
see it... just as if *you* post off topic... if my filters are working
properly, I won't see that either.

Enter the "smithers" characters... and, frankly, this didn't start
with smithers, I realized that there was a new breed of netizen that
came to rec.boats only to cause trouble. Philosophically, I had a
problem with this.... this meant that in order to filter this sort of
person, I had to filter on a "name." The vandals soon caught on to
this, so I began to filter on the basis of news-server.... and,
frankly, this evolving filter technology has served me quite well. 99%
of what I see is boating related...

Early on, Netsock was publicly posting his "liberal" hit list aka as a
killfile. Far from hypocritical, I don't choose sides, but filter
*all* political posts.... included in my "hot list" are many political
terms... whether you post "democrats suck" or republicans suck," I
won't see your post. In fact... having said either democrat or
republican... I won't even see my own post.... and if you wish me to
see any response to same, you'll have to edit out all "political"
content.

Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you
are.


See far deeper than I do, O wise one....

In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I
have
no
respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because
of
your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You
come
swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't
expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel.


If you are going to post ill of me... at least spell my name
right......

and just so I'll understand, could you repost what I said that was
hypocritical?

Oh... nevermind. I see I'm in your killfile....

No, I told said I wasn't going to killfile you. In fact, I want to see
every
hypocrisy you post.

It is just fine and dandy by you for Krause to pollute this newsgroup like
a
trashy old boys club. Just filter everyone you don't like, or complains
about the off topic posting, and go about your business of posting scum.
Screw anybody new to the group, you guys own it, right? WRONG!!!!!!!!!

You have presented no defensible facts. You did not condemn Krause for
starting this. Think about yourself. What moral grounds do you have to
speak
on your podium from? NOT ONE!!!!! None of your replies have included a
condemnation of Krause. WHY!!!!

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

Tit for tat, except Krause is OK and Larry is not? Remember, Krause
started
it. Oh, you conveniently forgot that eh?

You chose to jump in. You made the decision to criticize one and not the
other. Ergo, you are an off topic posting liberal abetting hypocrite. You
made your own name a hypocritical pile of dog dirt. Two faced prick.

You're full of it. No high horses or statues for you!!!!!

Thomas Rangier


Krause's post was prefaced with 'OT'. Larry's post was not
John H



Binary thinking get it wrong when you don't check the facts. The original
post by Larry was prefaced OT. Look back and see for yourself. No excuses
there.

Thomas Rangier



PS. You might, in the future, quote all of a response, instead of only a
portion.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."