BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   rec.boats needs less left winged idjits (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/45109-re-rec-boats-needs-less-left-winged-idjits.html)

Thomas Rangier June 22nd 05 03:06 AM


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits


I posted about Viking kittens - in boats - with horned helmets and
axes and stuff.



grin

Well Joey,
Were you ever in a Turkish prison?
Do you like gladiator movies?
Is the red zone or the white zone for loading?


Thomas Rangier



Shortwave Sportfishing June 22nd 05 11:45 AM

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:53:27 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits


I posted about Viking kittens - in boats - with horned helmets and
axes and stuff.


Admit it, Tom...you just like small pussies in battle gear.


Um....er....

Ahem...

Shortwave Sportfishing June 22nd 05 11:46 AM

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:06:19 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits


I posted about Viking kittens - in boats - with horned helmets and
axes and stuff.


grin

Well Joey,
Were you ever in a Turkish prison?
Do you like gladiator movies?
Is the red zone or the white zone for loading?


LOL!!!!

John H June 22nd 05 12:04 PM

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:59:53 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats it
is
all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of
the
highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in
rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having dockside
conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your
sorry
ass out.


I simply don't understand your position. Initially, I made the
conscious decision not to filter people, but to filter "off topic"
content, as far as I could. If Harry chooses to post off topic I won't
see it... just as if *you* post off topic... if my filters are working
properly, I won't see that either.

Enter the "smithers" characters... and, frankly, this didn't start
with smithers, I realized that there was a new breed of netizen that
came to rec.boats only to cause trouble. Philosophically, I had a
problem with this.... this meant that in order to filter this sort of
person, I had to filter on a "name." The vandals soon caught on to
this, so I began to filter on the basis of news-server.... and,
frankly, this evolving filter technology has served me quite well. 99%
of what I see is boating related...

Early on, Netsock was publicly posting his "liberal" hit list aka as a
killfile. Far from hypocritical, I don't choose sides, but filter
*all* political posts.... included in my "hot list" are many political
terms... whether you post "democrats suck" or republicans suck," I
won't see your post. In fact... having said either democrat or
republican... I won't even see my own post.... and if you wish me to
see any response to same, you'll have to edit out all "political"
content.

Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you are.


See far deeper than I do, O wise one....

In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I have
no
respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because of
your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You
come
swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't
expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel.


If you are going to post ill of me... at least spell my name
right......

and just so I'll understand, could you repost what I said that was
hypocritical?

Oh... nevermind. I see I'm in your killfile....

No, I told said I wasn't going to killfile you. In fact, I want to see every
hypocrisy you post.

It is just fine and dandy by you for Krause to pollute this newsgroup like a
trashy old boys club. Just filter everyone you don't like, or complains
about the off topic posting, and go about your business of posting scum.
Screw anybody new to the group, you guys own it, right? WRONG!!!!!!!!!

You have presented no defensible facts. You did not condemn Krause for
starting this. Think about yourself. What moral grounds do you have to speak
on your podium from? NOT ONE!!!!! None of your replies have included a
condemnation of Krause. WHY!!!!

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

Tit for tat, except Krause is OK and Larry is not? Remember, Krause started
it. Oh, you conveniently forgot that eh?

You chose to jump in. You made the decision to criticize one and not the
other. Ergo, you are an off topic posting liberal abetting hypocrite. You
made your own name a hypocritical pile of dog dirt. Two faced prick.

You're full of it. No high horses or statues for you!!!!!

Thomas Rangier


Krause's post was prefaced with 'OT'. Larry's post was not. Of course, the OT
could have dropped from Larry's post earlier (which, I believe, it did), but
that would have prevented Gene from seeing the post only the first time.
Apparently MS Outlook, or some other software, drops the 'OT' preface when one
responds to an OT 'OT' post.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Thomas Rangier June 23rd 05 12:26 AM


"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:59:53 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats
it
is
all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of
the
highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in
rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having
dockside
conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your
sorry
ass out.


I simply don't understand your position. Initially, I made the
conscious decision not to filter people, but to filter "off topic"
content, as far as I could. If Harry chooses to post off topic I won't
see it... just as if *you* post off topic... if my filters are working
properly, I won't see that either.

Enter the "smithers" characters... and, frankly, this didn't start
with smithers, I realized that there was a new breed of netizen that
came to rec.boats only to cause trouble. Philosophically, I had a
problem with this.... this meant that in order to filter this sort of
person, I had to filter on a "name." The vandals soon caught on to
this, so I began to filter on the basis of news-server.... and,
frankly, this evolving filter technology has served me quite well. 99%
of what I see is boating related...

Early on, Netsock was publicly posting his "liberal" hit list aka as a
killfile. Far from hypocritical, I don't choose sides, but filter
*all* political posts.... included in my "hot list" are many political
terms... whether you post "democrats suck" or republicans suck," I
won't see your post. In fact... having said either democrat or
republican... I won't even see my own post.... and if you wish me to
see any response to same, you'll have to edit out all "political"
content.

Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you
are.


See far deeper than I do, O wise one....

In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I
have
no
respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because
of
your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You
come
swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't
expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel.


If you are going to post ill of me... at least spell my name
right......

and just so I'll understand, could you repost what I said that was
hypocritical?

Oh... nevermind. I see I'm in your killfile....

No, I told said I wasn't going to killfile you. In fact, I want to see
every
hypocrisy you post.

It is just fine and dandy by you for Krause to pollute this newsgroup like
a
trashy old boys club. Just filter everyone you don't like, or complains
about the off topic posting, and go about your business of posting scum.
Screw anybody new to the group, you guys own it, right? WRONG!!!!!!!!!

You have presented no defensible facts. You did not condemn Krause for
starting this. Think about yourself. What moral grounds do you have to
speak
on your podium from? NOT ONE!!!!! None of your replies have included a
condemnation of Krause. WHY!!!!

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

Tit for tat, except Krause is OK and Larry is not? Remember, Krause
started
it. Oh, you conveniently forgot that eh?

You chose to jump in. You made the decision to criticize one and not the
other. Ergo, you are an off topic posting liberal abetting hypocrite. You
made your own name a hypocritical pile of dog dirt. Two faced prick.

You're full of it. No high horses or statues for you!!!!!

Thomas Rangier


Krause's post was prefaced with 'OT'. Larry's post was not
John H



Binary thinking get it wrong when you don't check the facts. The original
post by Larry was prefaced OT. Look back and see for yourself. No excuses
there.

Thomas Rangier




John H June 23rd 05 10:40 PM

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:26:13 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:59:53 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats
it
is
all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of
the
highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in
rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having
dockside
conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your
sorry
ass out.


I simply don't understand your position. Initially, I made the
conscious decision not to filter people, but to filter "off topic"
content, as far as I could. If Harry chooses to post off topic I won't
see it... just as if *you* post off topic... if my filters are working
properly, I won't see that either.

Enter the "smithers" characters... and, frankly, this didn't start
with smithers, I realized that there was a new breed of netizen that
came to rec.boats only to cause trouble. Philosophically, I had a
problem with this.... this meant that in order to filter this sort of
person, I had to filter on a "name." The vandals soon caught on to
this, so I began to filter on the basis of news-server.... and,
frankly, this evolving filter technology has served me quite well. 99%
of what I see is boating related...

Early on, Netsock was publicly posting his "liberal" hit list aka as a
killfile. Far from hypocritical, I don't choose sides, but filter
*all* political posts.... included in my "hot list" are many political
terms... whether you post "democrats suck" or republicans suck," I
won't see your post. In fact... having said either democrat or
republican... I won't even see my own post.... and if you wish me to
see any response to same, you'll have to edit out all "political"
content.

Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you
are.


See far deeper than I do, O wise one....

In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I
have
no
respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because
of
your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You
come
swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't
expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel.


If you are going to post ill of me... at least spell my name
right......

and just so I'll understand, could you repost what I said that was
hypocritical?

Oh... nevermind. I see I'm in your killfile....

No, I told said I wasn't going to killfile you. In fact, I want to see
every
hypocrisy you post.

It is just fine and dandy by you for Krause to pollute this newsgroup like
a
trashy old boys club. Just filter everyone you don't like, or complains
about the off topic posting, and go about your business of posting scum.
Screw anybody new to the group, you guys own it, right? WRONG!!!!!!!!!

You have presented no defensible facts. You did not condemn Krause for
starting this. Think about yourself. What moral grounds do you have to
speak
on your podium from? NOT ONE!!!!! None of your replies have included a
condemnation of Krause. WHY!!!!

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

Tit for tat, except Krause is OK and Larry is not? Remember, Krause
started
it. Oh, you conveniently forgot that eh?

You chose to jump in. You made the decision to criticize one and not the
other. Ergo, you are an off topic posting liberal abetting hypocrite. You
made your own name a hypocritical pile of dog dirt. Two faced prick.

You're full of it. No high horses or statues for you!!!!!

Thomas Rangier


Krause's post was prefaced with 'OT'. Larry's post was not
John H



Binary thinking get it wrong when you don't check the facts. The original
post by Larry was prefaced OT. Look back and see for yourself. No excuses
there.

Thomas Rangier


Did Gene, in fact, look at the original post or one of the followup with the OT
removed?

If you can answer that in the affirmative, you're psychic.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

John H June 23rd 05 10:40 PM

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:26:13 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:59:53 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats
it
is
all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of
the
highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in
rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having
dockside
conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your
sorry
ass out.


I simply don't understand your position. Initially, I made the
conscious decision not to filter people, but to filter "off topic"
content, as far as I could. If Harry chooses to post off topic I won't
see it... just as if *you* post off topic... if my filters are working
properly, I won't see that either.

Enter the "smithers" characters... and, frankly, this didn't start
with smithers, I realized that there was a new breed of netizen that
came to rec.boats only to cause trouble. Philosophically, I had a
problem with this.... this meant that in order to filter this sort of
person, I had to filter on a "name." The vandals soon caught on to
this, so I began to filter on the basis of news-server.... and,
frankly, this evolving filter technology has served me quite well. 99%
of what I see is boating related...

Early on, Netsock was publicly posting his "liberal" hit list aka as a
killfile. Far from hypocritical, I don't choose sides, but filter
*all* political posts.... included in my "hot list" are many political
terms... whether you post "democrats suck" or republicans suck," I
won't see your post. In fact... having said either democrat or
republican... I won't even see my own post.... and if you wish me to
see any response to same, you'll have to edit out all "political"
content.

Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you
are.


See far deeper than I do, O wise one....

In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I
have
no
respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because
of
your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You
come
swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't
expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel.


If you are going to post ill of me... at least spell my name
right......

and just so I'll understand, could you repost what I said that was
hypocritical?

Oh... nevermind. I see I'm in your killfile....

No, I told said I wasn't going to killfile you. In fact, I want to see
every
hypocrisy you post.

It is just fine and dandy by you for Krause to pollute this newsgroup like
a
trashy old boys club. Just filter everyone you don't like, or complains
about the off topic posting, and go about your business of posting scum.
Screw anybody new to the group, you guys own it, right? WRONG!!!!!!!!!

You have presented no defensible facts. You did not condemn Krause for
starting this. Think about yourself. What moral grounds do you have to
speak
on your podium from? NOT ONE!!!!! None of your replies have included a
condemnation of Krause. WHY!!!!

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

Tit for tat, except Krause is OK and Larry is not? Remember, Krause
started
it. Oh, you conveniently forgot that eh?

You chose to jump in. You made the decision to criticize one and not the
other. Ergo, you are an off topic posting liberal abetting hypocrite. You
made your own name a hypocritical pile of dog dirt. Two faced prick.

You're full of it. No high horses or statues for you!!!!!

Thomas Rangier


Krause's post was prefaced with 'OT'. Larry's post was not
John H



Binary thinking get it wrong when you don't check the facts. The original
post by Larry was prefaced OT. Look back and see for yourself. No excuses
there.

Thomas Rangier



PS. You might, in the future, quote all of a response, instead of only a
portion.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Netsock June 27th 05 01:43 PM

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:58:04 -0400, "Gene Kearns"
wrote:

Heh heh...resorting to Krause lies now Gene? Perhaps you would like to

post
proof of this claim? Oh, cant do it? Guess that make you a liar.


I don't have to prove anything. A few years ago, I'm the one that
caught you trolling and then posting back under (yet) another alias to
tell yourself what a great guy Chris really was. Remember your
mistake? I'll refresh your memory.... same IP address. Not very
bright, huh? Now we have nym servers... right?


Been addressed. It was a student in my office. Your speculations are just
that...(wrong) assumptions.

LOL, poor Gene-o has been beating this dead horse for quite some time now.
Hey Gene, why not just lie, and say it IS me?


Proof that I've been beating that horse? Thought not.


Yes. You have repeated this claim many times. You sound like a broken
record.

I don't have any conclusive proof and I never posted that I did have.


Of course you dont.

However, if it smells like a duck, walks like a duck, looks like a
duck, and quacks like a duck.... forgive my foolish observation that
it probably is a duck....


Your problem is that you dont know what a duck is.

The fact that you don't find the smithers sort of behavior
objectionable.... well, that speaks volumes.


LOL! Yea Gene...lets get serious about this wreck of a newsgroup on Usenet,
and how people "act" here. yea, thats the ticket.

Point to just *one* lie that I've told....


You said my Father has a jet boat.

If you've gone to the trouble of searching for my address... surely
you know that I have another address within sight of the Atlantic
Ocean and the ICW.... My boat is .3 mile from salt water


So you say.

... how about
yours?


A mere 2 hours from Lake Erie Gene. Close enough to go for the day...which I
have done many times. Ever hear of lake Erie Gene?

Youre sounding more like Krause every day.

Now go away.

--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/



Netsock June 27th 05 01:51 PM

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:01:49 -0400, "Gene Kearns"
wrote:

Again.... *you* used to post that it was your father's boat.


Never.

I said my Father helped build it. As did my brother and other family
memebers and friends. That still makes the boat mine.

Were you
lying then or now.... or... did he sell it to you... since you now
are implying ownership?


You are just like Krause. Repeat your lies long eneough, and even you will
start believing them.

The fact that your posts aren't archived doesn't prove or disprove
anything.


All my posts are archived. I have never blocked any of them. If you say I
posted it was my Fathers boat, then it is there.

Whats the matter Gene, couldnt find it, so now you fabricate another lie
that I must block archiving of my posts?

What a pathetic exsistence you must have...

Go away little man...

--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com