![]() |
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:05:29 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote: Thomas Rangier wrote: "Netsock" wrote in message ... "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... For those of you not "old" enough to remember the creation of the "alt." groups.... it stands for Anarchists, Lunatics, and Terrorists... Sorry Gene-o...wrong again. I *WAS* around for the birth of Usenet, and "alt" stands for alternative. Perhaps if you didnt try so hard, making yourself look knowledgable... -- -Netsock "It's just about going fast...that's all..." http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/ I am still waiting on Gene. I want to know if he has Harry filtered and got caught by surprise or if he is just a left wing hypocrite. That won't do much for his reputation. I doubt he has me filtered since I never get into these discussions. But this one tweaked my nose. Methinks Gene is doing a bit of tweaking himself, and some just don't realize when they are being tweaked. Who - Gene? No freakin' way - not Gene. ~~ snicker ~~ Later, Tom |
"HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:05:29 -0400, HarryKrause wrote: Thomas Rangier wrote: "Netsock" wrote in message ... "Gene Kearns" wrote in message om... For those of you not "old" enough to remember the creation of the "alt." groups.... it stands for Anarchists, Lunatics, and Terrorists... Sorry Gene-o...wrong again. I *WAS* around for the birth of Usenet, and "alt" stands for alternative. Perhaps if you didnt try so hard, making yourself look knowledgable... -- -Netsock "It's just about going fast...that's all..." http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/ I am still waiting on Gene. I want to know if he has Harry filtered and got caught by surprise or if he is just a left wing hypocrite. That won't do much for his reputation. I doubt he has me filtered since I never get into these discussions. But this one tweaked my nose. Methinks Gene is doing a bit of tweaking himself, and some just don't realize when they are being tweaked. Who - Gene? No freakin' way - not Gene. ~~ snicker ~~ Later, Tom Just when I think the dumbest poster possible on rec.boats has revealed himself, some smartass like Gene will come along and "out" a new champion, although I have to admit that Netsock has been on the contender list for a while. No offense, but you have outed yourself long ago. |
"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:05:29 -0400, HarryKrause wrote: Thomas Rangier wrote: "Netsock" wrote in message ... "Gene Kearns" wrote in message m... For those of you not "old" enough to remember the creation of the "alt." groups.... it stands for Anarchists, Lunatics, and Terrorists... Sorry Gene-o...wrong again. I *WAS* around for the birth of Usenet, and "alt" stands for alternative. Perhaps if you didnt try so hard, making yourself look knowledgable... -- -Netsock "It's just about going fast...that's all..." http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/ I am still waiting on Gene. I want to know if he has Harry filtered and got caught by surprise or if he is just a left wing hypocrite. That won't do much for his reputation. I doubt he has me filtered since I never get into these discussions. But this one tweaked my nose. Methinks Gene is doing a bit of tweaking himself, and some just don't realize when they are being tweaked. Who - Gene? No freakin' way - not Gene. ~~ snicker ~~ Later, Tom Well, I certainly have nothing to fear. If I don't hear his response soon, I will be more than happy to post the question to every boating newsgroup there is. We will find out, one way or the other. Thomas Rangier (Look me up on the net, maybe someone can find my house and take pictures of it. I have an unlisted phone number) I don't care!!! |
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:25:51 -0400, Arnie arnie@nospam wrote: Hey Gene and Stanley, you were quick to jump. I looked back and noticed you didn't have any comments about Harry's post. It was without doubt a troll post. Now you have me curious. Why jump on a black kettle and not a black pot? BTW, if you look at the names used by posters to this group, the vast majority do not use a full name thus accordingly they are all Smithers and cowards. Like I said, your comments made me curious why you chose to step in here. I can't really address your first question. I don't have Harry killfiled per se, however, I have some pretty strong filters and if he hits any of my "hot" words, it is likely that I won't see it. I didn't get any of his posts to this thread.... if you are talking about this thread. I responded to a vandal. I certainly disagree with your statement that, "the vast majority do not use a full name thus accordingly they are all Smithers and cowards." The vast majority don't employ nym servers and other elaborate means to maintain anonymity.... as a criminal chooses to wear a mask.. Neither do they come here specifically to troll and incite others to riot. The vast majority appear to own a boat.... the smithers and cowards appear to have no interest in boating and it seems logical to conclude that they have no boat, either. While off topic posting has always been a part of rec.boats... it was done as one might engage in conversation at the docks..... and I don't know about your local docks, but around here, people in masks, picking a fight, aren't very welcome in any boating circles.... I don't think this has anything to do with Harry, politics, or anything else.... other than a bunch of children that get some sick sense of pleasure by baiting other people and desperately begging for some sort of attention... even negative attention..... and the more the better.... -- Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats it is all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of the highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having dockside conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your sorry ass out. Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you are. In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I have no respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because of your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You come swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel. Thomas Rangier |
"Thomas Rangier" wrote in message ... "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:25:51 -0400, Arnie arnie@nospam wrote: Hey Gene and Stanley, you were quick to jump. I looked back and noticed you didn't have any comments about Harry's post. It was without doubt a troll post. Now you have me curious. Why jump on a black kettle and not a black pot? BTW, if you look at the names used by posters to this group, the vast majority do not use a full name thus accordingly they are all Smithers and cowards. Like I said, your comments made me curious why you chose to step in here. I can't really address your first question. I don't have Harry killfiled per se, however, I have some pretty strong filters and if he hits any of my "hot" words, it is likely that I won't see it. I didn't get any of his posts to this thread.... if you are talking about this thread. I responded to a vandal. I certainly disagree with your statement that, "the vast majority do not use a full name thus accordingly they are all Smithers and cowards." The vast majority don't employ nym servers and other elaborate means to maintain anonymity.... as a criminal chooses to wear a mask.. Neither do they come here specifically to troll and incite others to riot. The vast majority appear to own a boat.... the smithers and cowards appear to have no interest in boating and it seems logical to conclude that they have no boat, either. While off topic posting has always been a part of rec.boats... it was done as one might engage in conversation at the docks..... and I don't know about your local docks, but around here, people in masks, picking a fight, aren't very welcome in any boating circles.... I don't think this has anything to do with Harry, politics, or anything else.... other than a bunch of children that get some sick sense of pleasure by baiting other people and desperately begging for some sort of attention... even negative attention..... and the more the better.... -- Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats it is all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of the highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having dockside conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your sorry ass out. Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you are. In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I have no respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because of your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You come swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel. Thomas Rangier On second thought, I won't filter you. I might just hang around to remind everyone at every post you make just what a shocking double standard you apply. A hypocrite of the highest order. Thomas Rangier And yes, I am Canadian |
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... By the way, the little telephone boy Hi Gene. What does the above mean? you responded to... netsock, aka Christopher Greenhalgh, , Thats my name, dont wear it out! :) and probably about eight dozen other aliases Heh heh...resorting to Krause lies now Gene? Perhaps you would like to post proof of this claim? Oh, cant do it? Guess that make you a liar. However, is posting from a Columbus, Ohio RoadRunner address..... if you want a real eye-opener, go back and see how many of the "smithers" posts came from a Columbus/RoadRunner address.... LOL, poor Gene-o has been beating this dead horse for quite some time now. Hey Gene, why not just lie, and say it IS me? Or better yet, would it make you feel better if I take the rap? I don't really care either way. Why not get off it pal, and stop with the lies. Some folks might find it suspect that YOU have a boat. Reidsville is VERY landlocked, and quite the distance to ANY substantial water... -- -Netsock "It's just about going fast...that's all..." http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/ |
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... I have been on Usenet since about 1980.. connecting through the UNC computers on a Unix box via UUCP. Actually, I was on around late 1981, so maybe I did miss the "birth" per say. But nice job on patting yourself on the back Gene-o. If you *were* around, then.. I doubt you were doing anything more than playing in the sandbox next to your father's jetboat.... Oh here we go again... Care to post ANY proof that my Father owns a jet-boat? Or will you just ignore this reply, as you usually do, when you cant back up what you claim. .....you'd also know that in 1986-7, when USENET was re-organized.. ALT was not included, but was added later to give people like you a place to vent their mis-directed angst.... Hey, I dont have any angst! But I do remember the re-structuring...that is when Usenet started to become mainstream. Now...... how about moving your smithering to some Anarchist, Lunatic, and/or Terrorist newsgroup and leave the rest of us rec.people alone.... No thanks...Im quite content here. Why dont YOU take a break...maybe you can build another shrine to yourself. ;) and, no, isn't all about going fast.... Youre right. Its about planning, engineering, foresight, fabrication, skill, the ability to make thing happen, and bringing complex designs together. Thanks for pointing that out Gene-o. .... have a nice day.... You too...take care. :) -- -Netsock "It's just about going fast...that's all..." http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/ |
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:59:53 -0400, "Thomas Rangier" wrote: Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats it is all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of the highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having dockside conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your sorry ass out. I simply don't understand your position. Initially, I made the conscious decision not to filter people, but to filter "off topic" content, as far as I could. If Harry chooses to post off topic I won't see it... just as if *you* post off topic... if my filters are working properly, I won't see that either. Enter the "smithers" characters... and, frankly, this didn't start with smithers, I realized that there was a new breed of netizen that came to rec.boats only to cause trouble. Philosophically, I had a problem with this.... this meant that in order to filter this sort of person, I had to filter on a "name." The vandals soon caught on to this, so I began to filter on the basis of news-server.... and, frankly, this evolving filter technology has served me quite well. 99% of what I see is boating related... Early on, Netsock was publicly posting his "liberal" hit list aka as a killfile. Far from hypocritical, I don't choose sides, but filter *all* political posts.... included in my "hot list" are many political terms... whether you post "democrats suck" or republicans suck," I won't see your post. In fact... having said either democrat or republican... I won't even see my own post.... and if you wish me to see any response to same, you'll have to edit out all "political" content. Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you are. See far deeper than I do, O wise one.... In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I have no respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because of your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You come swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel. If you are going to post ill of me... at least spell my name right...... and just so I'll understand, could you repost what I said that was hypocritical? Oh... nevermind. I see I'm in your killfile.... No, I told said I wasn't going to killfile you. In fact, I want to see every hypocrisy you post. It is just fine and dandy by you for Krause to pollute this newsgroup like a trashy old boys club. Just filter everyone you don't like, or complains about the off topic posting, and go about your business of posting scum. Screw anybody new to the group, you guys own it, right? WRONG!!!!!!!!! You have presented no defensible facts. You did not condemn Krause for starting this. Think about yourself. What moral grounds do you have to speak on your podium from? NOT ONE!!!!! None of your replies have included a condemnation of Krause. WHY!!!! Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties... Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits Tit for tat, except Krause is OK and Larry is not? Remember, Krause started it. Oh, you conveniently forgot that eh? You chose to jump in. You made the decision to criticize one and not the other. Ergo, you are an off topic posting liberal abetting hypocrite. You made your own name a hypocritical pile of dog dirt. Two faced prick. You're full of it. No high horses or statues for you!!!!! Thomas Rangier |
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote: Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties... Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits I posted about Viking kittens - in boats - with horned helmets and axes and stuff. |
"HarryKrause" wrote in message ... Thomas Rangier wrote: "Gene Kearns" wrote in message ... On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:59:53 -0400, "Thomas Rangier" wrote: Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats it is all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of the highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having dockside conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your sorry ass out. I simply don't understand your position. Initially, I made the conscious decision not to filter people, but to filter "off topic" content, as far as I could. If Harry chooses to post off topic I won't see it... just as if *you* post off topic... if my filters are working properly, I won't see that either. Enter the "smithers" characters... and, frankly, this didn't start with smithers, I realized that there was a new breed of netizen that came to rec.boats only to cause trouble. Philosophically, I had a problem with this.... this meant that in order to filter this sort of person, I had to filter on a "name." The vandals soon caught on to this, so I began to filter on the basis of news-server.... and, frankly, this evolving filter technology has served me quite well. 99% of what I see is boating related... Early on, Netsock was publicly posting his "liberal" hit list aka as a killfile. Far from hypocritical, I don't choose sides, but filter *all* political posts.... included in my "hot list" are many political terms... whether you post "democrats suck" or republicans suck," I won't see your post. In fact... having said either democrat or republican... I won't even see my own post.... and if you wish me to see any response to same, you'll have to edit out all "political" content. Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you are. See far deeper than I do, O wise one.... In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I have no respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because of your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You come swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel. If you are going to post ill of me... at least spell my name right...... and just so I'll understand, could you repost what I said that was hypocritical? Oh... nevermind. I see I'm in your killfile.... No, I told said I wasn't going to killfile you. In fact, I want to see every hypocrisy you post. It is just fine and dandy by you for Krause to pollute this newsgroup like a trashy old boys club. Just filter everyone you don't like, or complains about the off topic posting, and go about your business of posting scum. Screw anybody new to the group, you guys own it, right? WRONG!!!!!!!!! You have presented no defensible facts. You did not condemn Krause for starting this. Think about yourself. What moral grounds do you have to speak on your podium from? NOT ONE!!!!! None of your replies have included a condemnation of Krause. WHY!!!! Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties... Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits Tit for tat, except Krause is OK and Larry is not? Remember, Krause started it. Oh, you conveniently forgot that eh? You chose to jump in. You made the decision to criticize one and not the other. Ergo, you are an off topic posting liberal abetting hypocrite. You made your own name a hypocritical pile of dog dirt. Two faced prick. You're full of it. No high horses or statues for you!!!!! Thomas Rangier I find it telling that you and that piece of crap from Columbus, "Netscumbag," are picking on Gene, who is one of the nicest and most helpful posters in rec.boats. Your posts say far, far more about you two then they do about Gene. Perhaps you and Netscumbag should marry, have sex, and raise a generation of little Tuuks. Of all the people in this group, you are without a doubt the biggest asshole. You put Jennifer Lopez to shame. Plonk me please. Thomas Rangier |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com