rec.boats needs less left winged idjits
 

If this isn't a bait for a flame war- I don't know what is.... Welcome to my
killfile- enjoy your stay with all the "left-wing idjits"

Plonk


"Larry" wrote in message
...
Seems that 90% of OT posting is done by the left wingers.

I think we need less less left winged OT posters.
rec.boats doesn't need you.

Larry

Larry
------------------------
The worst thing that ever happened
to rec.boats was Harry Krause

"Arnie" arnie@nospam wrote in message
...
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:05:21 -0400, Larry wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:44:13 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 18:18:35 -0400, Larry
wrote:

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:06:01 GMT, "Stanley Barthfarkle"

wrote:

If this isn't a bait for a flame war- I don't know what is.... Welcome
to my
killfile- enjoy your stay with all the "left-wing idjits"

Plonk

And the post "Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties..." is not a
troll
post in your mind?

Oh, wait I get it. You are a lefty. Lefty trolling posts are OK with
you.

Happy to be plonked by an idjit. I am sure I will reside with good,
sensible, smart company.


No. Actually, all trolling is passe....

any reason you are using a foreign news-server?.....that is, beyond
your obvious cowardice?

No cowardice. Ever hear of the words "free". Why pay for new service when
it
is free. It only carries about 25,000 groups though. Not much alt., no
binaries or warez either.

So the question I have, which remains unanswered, is "why is it OK for
Krause to start a flame war by maligning conservatives" with his Uncle
Sam
Needs the Rec.Boats Righties post?

But, Oh my, Oh my, the outrage when the tables are turned? I happen to be
a
conservative and found his post disgusting.

Were you as thoughtful about his post? Did you express your opinion that
he
was wrong? Did you just give him a free pass?


Hey Gene and Stanley, you were quick to jump. I looked back and noticed
you
didn't have any comments about Harry's post. It was without doubt a troll
post.

Now you have me curious. Why jump on a black kettle and not a black pot?

BTW, if you look at the names used by posters to this group, the vast
majority do not use a full name thus accordingly they are all Smithers and
cowards.

Like I said, your comments made me curious why you chose to step in here.


Curious too!

Thomas Rangier

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:39:58 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote:

For those of you not "old" enough to remember the creation of the
"alt." groups.... it stands for Anarchists, Lunatics, and
Terrorists...

For some reason, I figured you for a fellow traveler.

Later,

Tom

On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:04:05 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

Arnie wrote:
me curious. Why jump on a black kettle and not a black pot?

BTW, if you look at the names used by posters to this group, the vast
majority do not use a full name thus accordingly they are all Smithers and
cowards.



Sorry, stupid, but a handle using only a first name isn't what qualifies
a poster as a "Smithers."


- - -
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

Harry, you're last several posts have been about your comparisons of dick sizes.
Yet you call someone else 'stupid'?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

That post doesn't appear in my browser, so the idiot who posted it is likely
already blocked. A mildly intelligent person might have deduced this
straight away...


"Larry" babbled incessantly in message
...
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 22:06:01 GMT, "Stanley Barthfarkle"
wrote:

If this isn't a bait for a flame war- I don't know what is.... Welcome to
my
killfile- enjoy your stay with all the "left-wing idjits"

Plonk

And the post "Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties..." is not a troll

Now you have me curious. Why jump on a black kettle and not a black pot?



Harry and all the other Left wing assholes are already blocked. It's a
boating group, and all politics aside, I want to read about boats here. I
have the presence of mind to type in "politics" when I want a dose of
political banter. When one of my "conservative" brethren decides to- (a)-
further pollute the group with OT crap, and (b)- give the mindless liberals
another reason to justify a flame war, I'll call him on it, and promptly
plonk his ass. It's a BOAT group, kids.

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:
Now you have me curious. Why jump on a black kettle and not a black pot?




Harry and all the other Left wing assholes are already blocked. It's a
boating group, and all politics aside, I want to read about boats here. I
have the presence of mind to type in "politics" when I want a dose of
political banter. When one of my "conservative" brethren decides to- (a)-
further pollute the group with OT crap, and (b)- give the mindless
liberals another reason to justify a flame war, I'll call him on it, and
promptly plonk his ass. It's a BOAT group, kids.

Here is a list of names of all the people in the known universe who give a
rat's butt about you or what you do, Stanley:
--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.

Ok, Stanley gave a perfectly reasonable answer to the question. Will Gene
now step up to the plate?
Does Gene have Harry filtered too or does he just tip to the left?

Thomas Rangier

So you missed Harry's post entitled:

OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...


The mindless liberals started a flamewar. I think that plain dirt
simple
retaliation just took effect.


Not every conservative is willing to turn the other cheek and let crap
like
Harry's get posted without a response.


Freddy

**************

Do try avoid interpreting the world through a series of negative
stereotypes.
Harry Krause, not "the mindless liberals" authored the OT post that
fired up the flame war.
I'm sure that all the conservatives are collectively responsible for
the flame bait and/or endless
OT focus on personalities spewing regularly from FLA and OH? Of course
not.

Why not "retaliate" in the appropriate thread?

By the way, the NG needs "fewer" (not less) idjits.

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...

For those of you not "old" enough to remember the creation of the
"alt." groups.... it stands for Anarchists, Lunatics, and
Terrorists...

Sorry Gene-o...wrong again.

I *WAS* around for the birth of Usenet, and "alt" stands for alternative.

Perhaps if you didnt try so hard, making yourself look knowledgable...


--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/

"Netsock" wrote in message
...

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...

For those of you not "old" enough to remember the creation of the
"alt." groups.... it stands for Anarchists, Lunatics, and
Terrorists...

Sorry Gene-o...wrong again.

I *WAS* around for the birth of Usenet, and "alt" stands for alternative.

Perhaps if you didnt try so hard, making yourself look knowledgable...


--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/




I am still waiting on Gene. I want to know if he has Harry filtered and got
caught by surprise or if he is just a left wing hypocrite. That won't do
much for his reputation. I doubt he has me filtered since I never get into
these discussions. But this one tweaked my nose.

Regards,
Thomas Rangier
(My real name, no nick, no nothing, my real birthname)

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:05:29 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

Thomas Rangier wrote:
"Netsock" wrote in message
...

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...


For those of you not "old" enough to remember the creation of the
"alt." groups.... it stands for Anarchists, Lunatics, and
Terrorists...

Sorry Gene-o...wrong again.

I *WAS* around for the birth of Usenet, and "alt" stands for alternative.

Perhaps if you didnt try so hard, making yourself look knowledgable...


--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/

I am still waiting on Gene. I want to know if he has Harry filtered and got
caught by surprise or if he is just a left wing hypocrite. That won't do
much for his reputation. I doubt he has me filtered since I never get into
these discussions. But this one tweaked my nose.

Methinks Gene is doing a bit of tweaking himself, and some just don't
realize when they are being tweaked.

Who - Gene? No freakin' way - not Gene.

~~ snicker ~~

Later,

Tom

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:05:29 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:


Thomas Rangier wrote:

"Netsock" wrote in message
...


"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
om...



For those of you not "old" enough to remember the creation of the
"alt." groups.... it stands for Anarchists, Lunatics, and
Terrorists...

Sorry Gene-o...wrong again.

I *WAS* around for the birth of Usenet, and "alt" stands for
alternative.

Perhaps if you didnt try so hard, making yourself look knowledgable...


--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/

I am still waiting on Gene. I want to know if he has Harry filtered and
got caught by surprise or if he is just a left wing hypocrite. That
won't do much for his reputation. I doubt he has me filtered since I
never get into these discussions. But this one tweaked my nose.

Methinks Gene is doing a bit of tweaking himself, and some just don't
realize when they are being tweaked.


Who - Gene? No freakin' way - not Gene.

~~ snicker ~~

Later,

Tom



Just when I think the dumbest poster possible on rec.boats has revealed
himself, some smartass like Gene will come along and "out" a new champion,
although I have to admit that Netsock has been on the contender list for a
while.


No offense, but you have outed yourself long ago.

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:05:29 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

Thomas Rangier wrote:
"Netsock" wrote in message
...

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
m...


For those of you not "old" enough to remember the creation of the
"alt." groups.... it stands for Anarchists, Lunatics, and
Terrorists...

Sorry Gene-o...wrong again.

I *WAS* around for the birth of Usenet, and "alt" stands for
alternative.

Perhaps if you didnt try so hard, making yourself look knowledgable...


--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/

I am still waiting on Gene. I want to know if he has Harry filtered and
got
caught by surprise or if he is just a left wing hypocrite. That won't do
much for his reputation. I doubt he has me filtered since I never get
into
these discussions. But this one tweaked my nose.

Methinks Gene is doing a bit of tweaking himself, and some just don't
realize when they are being tweaked.

Who - Gene? No freakin' way - not Gene.

~~ snicker ~~

Later,

Tom



Well, I certainly have nothing to fear. If I don't hear his response soon, I
will be more than happy to post the question to every boating newsgroup
there is. We will find out, one way or the other.

Thomas Rangier
(Look me up on the net, maybe someone can find my house and take pictures of
it. I have an unlisted phone number) I don't care!!!

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:25:51 -0400, Arnie arnie@nospam wrote:


Hey Gene and Stanley, you were quick to jump. I looked back and noticed
you
didn't have any comments about Harry's post. It was without doubt a troll
post.

Now you have me curious. Why jump on a black kettle and not a black pot?

BTW, if you look at the names used by posters to this group, the vast
majority do not use a full name thus accordingly they are all Smithers and
cowards.

Like I said, your comments made me curious why you chose to step in here.

I can't really address your first question. I don't have Harry
killfiled per se, however, I have some pretty strong filters and if
he hits any of my "hot" words, it is likely that I won't see it. I
didn't get any of his posts to this thread.... if you are talking
about this thread.

I responded to a vandal. I certainly disagree with your statement
that, "the vast majority do not use a full name thus accordingly they
are all Smithers and cowards." The vast majority don't employ nym
servers and other elaborate means to maintain anonymity.... as a
criminal chooses to wear a mask.. Neither do they come here
specifically to troll and incite others to riot. The vast majority
appear to own a boat.... the smithers and cowards appear to have no
interest in boating and it seems logical to conclude that they have no
boat, either.

While off topic posting has always been a part of rec.boats... it was
done as one might engage in conversation at the docks..... and I don't
know about your local docks, but around here, people in masks, picking
a fight, aren't very welcome in any boating circles....

I don't think this has anything to do with Harry, politics, or
anything else.... other than a bunch of children that get some sick
sense of pleasure by baiting other people and desperately begging for
some sort of attention... even negative attention..... and the more
the better....

--

Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats it is
all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of the
highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in
rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having dockside
conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your sorry
ass out.

Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you are.

In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I have no
respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because of
your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You come
swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't
expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel.

Thomas Rangier

"Thomas Rangier" wrote in message
...

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 19 Jun 2005 19:25:51 -0400, Arnie arnie@nospam wrote:


Hey Gene and Stanley, you were quick to jump. I looked back and noticed
you
didn't have any comments about Harry's post. It was without doubt a troll
post.

Now you have me curious. Why jump on a black kettle and not a black pot?

BTW, if you look at the names used by posters to this group, the vast
majority do not use a full name thus accordingly they are all Smithers
and
cowards.

Like I said, your comments made me curious why you chose to step in here.

I can't really address your first question. I don't have Harry
killfiled per se, however, I have some pretty strong filters and if
he hits any of my "hot" words, it is likely that I won't see it. I
didn't get any of his posts to this thread.... if you are talking
about this thread.

I responded to a vandal. I certainly disagree with your statement
that, "the vast majority do not use a full name thus accordingly they
are all Smithers and cowards." The vast majority don't employ nym
servers and other elaborate means to maintain anonymity.... as a
criminal chooses to wear a mask.. Neither do they come here
specifically to troll and incite others to riot. The vast majority
appear to own a boat.... the smithers and cowards appear to have no
interest in boating and it seems logical to conclude that they have no
boat, either.

While off topic posting has always been a part of rec.boats... it was
done as one might engage in conversation at the docks..... and I don't
know about your local docks, but around here, people in masks, picking
a fight, aren't very welcome in any boating circles....

I don't think this has anything to do with Harry, politics, or
anything else.... other than a bunch of children that get some sick
sense of pleasure by baiting other people and desperately begging for
some sort of attention... even negative attention..... and the more
the better....

--

Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats it
is all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite
of the highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in
rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having dockside
conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your
sorry ass out.

Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you are.

In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I have
no respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because
of your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You
come swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns.
Don't expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel.

Thomas Rangier

On second thought, I won't filter you. I might just hang around to remind
everyone at every post you make just what a shocking double standard you
apply. A hypocrite of the highest order.

Thomas Rangier

And yes, I am Canadian

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
By the way, the little telephone boy

Hi Gene.

What does the above mean?

you responded to... netsock, aka
Christopher Greenhalgh, ,

Thats my name, dont wear it out! :)

and probably about eight dozen other aliases

Heh heh...resorting to Krause lies now Gene? Perhaps you would like to post
proof of this claim? Oh, cant do it? Guess that make you a liar.

However,
is posting from a Columbus, Ohio RoadRunner address..... if you want
a real eye-opener, go back and see how many of the "smithers" posts
came from a Columbus/RoadRunner address....

LOL, poor Gene-o has been beating this dead horse for quite some time now.
Hey Gene, why not just lie, and say it IS me?

Or better yet, would it make you feel better if I take the rap? I don't
really care either way.

Why not get off it pal, and stop with the lies. Some folks might find it
suspect that YOU have a boat. Reidsville is VERY landlocked, and quite the
distance to ANY substantial water...

--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
I have been on Usenet since about 1980.. connecting through the UNC
computers on a Unix box via UUCP.

Actually, I was on around late 1981, so maybe I did miss the "birth" per
say.

But nice job on patting yourself on the back Gene-o.

If you *were* around, then.. I doubt you were doing anything more than
playing in the sandbox next to your father's jetboat....

Oh here we go again...

Care to post ANY proof that my Father owns a jet-boat? Or will you just
ignore this reply, as you usually do, when you cant back up what you claim.

.....you'd also know that in 1986-7, when USENET was re-organized..
ALT was not included, but was added later to give people like you a
place to vent their mis-directed angst....

Hey, I dont have any angst! But I do remember the re-structuring...that is
when Usenet started to become mainstream.

Now...... how about moving your smithering to some Anarchist, Lunatic,
and/or Terrorist newsgroup and leave the rest of us rec.people
alone....

No thanks...Im quite content here. Why dont YOU take a break...maybe you can
build another shrine to yourself. ;)

and, no, isn't all about going fast....

Youre right. Its about planning, engineering, foresight, fabrication, skill,
the ability to make thing happen, and bringing complex designs together.
Thanks for pointing that out Gene-o.

.... have a nice day....

You too...take care. :)


--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/

"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:59:53 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats it
is
all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of
the
highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in
rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having dockside
conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your
sorry
ass out.


I simply don't understand your position. Initially, I made the
conscious decision not to filter people, but to filter "off topic"
content, as far as I could. If Harry chooses to post off topic I won't
see it... just as if *you* post off topic... if my filters are working
properly, I won't see that either.

Enter the "smithers" characters... and, frankly, this didn't start
with smithers, I realized that there was a new breed of netizen that
came to rec.boats only to cause trouble. Philosophically, I had a
problem with this.... this meant that in order to filter this sort of
person, I had to filter on a "name." The vandals soon caught on to
this, so I began to filter on the basis of news-server.... and,
frankly, this evolving filter technology has served me quite well. 99%
of what I see is boating related...

Early on, Netsock was publicly posting his "liberal" hit list aka as a
killfile. Far from hypocritical, I don't choose sides, but filter
*all* political posts.... included in my "hot list" are many political
terms... whether you post "democrats suck" or republicans suck," I
won't see your post. In fact... having said either democrat or
republican... I won't even see my own post.... and if you wish me to
see any response to same, you'll have to edit out all "political"
content.

Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you are.


See far deeper than I do, O wise one....

In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I have
no
respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because of
your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You
come
swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't
expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel.


If you are going to post ill of me... at least spell my name
right......

and just so I'll understand, could you repost what I said that was
hypocritical?

Oh... nevermind. I see I'm in your killfile....

No, I told said I wasn't going to killfile you. In fact, I want to see every
hypocrisy you post.

It is just fine and dandy by you for Krause to pollute this newsgroup like a
trashy old boys club. Just filter everyone you don't like, or complains
about the off topic posting, and go about your business of posting scum.
Screw anybody new to the group, you guys own it, right? WRONG!!!!!!!!!

You have presented no defensible facts. You did not condemn Krause for
starting this. Think about yourself. What moral grounds do you have to speak
on your podium from? NOT ONE!!!!! None of your replies have included a
condemnation of Krause. WHY!!!!

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

Tit for tat, except Krause is OK and Larry is not? Remember, Krause started
it. Oh, you conveniently forgot that eh?

You chose to jump in. You made the decision to criticize one and not the
other. Ergo, you are an off topic posting liberal abetting hypocrite. You
made your own name a hypocritical pile of dog dirt. Two faced prick.

You're full of it. No high horses or statues for you!!!!!

Thomas Rangier

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

I posted about Viking kittens - in boats - with horned helmets and
axes and stuff.

"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Thomas Rangier wrote:
"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:59:53 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:



Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats
it is
all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of
the
highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in
rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having
dockside
conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your
sorry
ass out.


I simply don't understand your position. Initially, I made the
conscious decision not to filter people, but to filter "off topic"
content, as far as I could. If Harry chooses to post off topic I won't
see it... just as if *you* post off topic... if my filters are working
properly, I won't see that either.

Enter the "smithers" characters... and, frankly, this didn't start
with smithers, I realized that there was a new breed of netizen that
came to rec.boats only to cause trouble. Philosophically, I had a
problem with this.... this meant that in order to filter this sort of
person, I had to filter on a "name." The vandals soon caught on to
this, so I began to filter on the basis of news-server.... and,
frankly, this evolving filter technology has served me quite well. 99%
of what I see is boating related...

Early on, Netsock was publicly posting his "liberal" hit list aka as a
killfile. Far from hypocritical, I don't choose sides, but filter
*all* political posts.... included in my "hot list" are many political
terms... whether you post "democrats suck" or republicans suck," I
won't see your post. In fact... having said either democrat or
republican... I won't even see my own post.... and if you wish me to
see any response to same, you'll have to edit out all "political"
content.


Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you
are.


See far deeper than I do, O wise one....


In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I
have no
respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because
of
your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You
come
swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't
expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel.


If you are going to post ill of me... at least spell my name
right......

and just so I'll understand, could you repost what I said that was
hypocritical?

Oh... nevermind. I see I'm in your killfile....


No, I told said I wasn't going to killfile you. In fact, I want to see
every hypocrisy you post.

It is just fine and dandy by you for Krause to pollute this newsgroup
like a trashy old boys club. Just filter everyone you don't like, or
complains about the off topic posting, and go about your business of
posting scum. Screw anybody new to the group, you guys own it, right?
WRONG!!!!!!!!!

You have presented no defensible facts. You did not condemn Krause for
starting this. Think about yourself. What moral grounds do you have to
speak on your podium from? NOT ONE!!!!! None of your replies have
included a condemnation of Krause. WHY!!!!

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

Tit for tat, except Krause is OK and Larry is not? Remember, Krause
started it. Oh, you conveniently forgot that eh?

You chose to jump in. You made the decision to criticize one and not the
other. Ergo, you are an off topic posting liberal abetting hypocrite. You
made your own name a hypocritical pile of dog dirt. Two faced prick.

You're full of it. No high horses or statues for you!!!!!

Thomas Rangier



I find it telling that you and that piece of crap from Columbus,
"Netscumbag," are picking on Gene, who is one of the nicest and most
helpful posters in rec.boats.

Your posts say far, far more about you two then they do about Gene.
Perhaps you and Netscumbag should marry, have sex, and raise a generation
of little Tuuks.


Of all the people in this group, you are without a doubt the biggest
asshole. You put Jennifer Lopez to shame. Plonk me please.

Thomas Rangier

"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

I posted about Viking kittens - in boats - with horned helmets and
axes and stuff.


grin

Well Joey,
Were you ever in a Turkish prison?
Do you like gladiator movies?
Is the red zone or the white zone for loading?


Thomas Rangier

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:53:27 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

I posted about Viking kittens - in boats - with horned helmets and
axes and stuff.

Admit it, Tom...you just like small pussies in battle gear.

Um....er....

Ahem...

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:06:19 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

I posted about Viking kittens - in boats - with horned helmets and
axes and stuff.

grin

Well Joey,
Were you ever in a Turkish prison?
Do you like gladiator movies?
Is the red zone or the white zone for loading?

LOL!!!!

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
.. .
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:59:53 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats it
is
all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of
the
highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in
rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having dockside
conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your
sorry
ass out.


I simply don't understand your position. Initially, I made the
conscious decision not to filter people, but to filter "off topic"
content, as far as I could. If Harry chooses to post off topic I won't
see it... just as if *you* post off topic... if my filters are working
properly, I won't see that either.

Enter the "smithers" characters... and, frankly, this didn't start
with smithers, I realized that there was a new breed of netizen that
came to rec.boats only to cause trouble. Philosophically, I had a
problem with this.... this meant that in order to filter this sort of
person, I had to filter on a "name." The vandals soon caught on to
this, so I began to filter on the basis of news-server.... and,
frankly, this evolving filter technology has served me quite well. 99%
of what I see is boating related...

Early on, Netsock was publicly posting his "liberal" hit list aka as a
killfile. Far from hypocritical, I don't choose sides, but filter
*all* political posts.... included in my "hot list" are many political
terms... whether you post "democrats suck" or republicans suck," I
won't see your post. In fact... having said either democrat or
republican... I won't even see my own post.... and if you wish me to
see any response to same, you'll have to edit out all "political"
content.

Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you are.


See far deeper than I do, O wise one....

In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I have
no
respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because of
your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You
come
swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't
expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel.


If you are going to post ill of me... at least spell my name
right......

and just so I'll understand, could you repost what I said that was
hypocritical?

Oh... nevermind. I see I'm in your killfile....

No, I told said I wasn't going to killfile you. In fact, I want to see every
hypocrisy you post.

It is just fine and dandy by you for Krause to pollute this newsgroup like a
trashy old boys club. Just filter everyone you don't like, or complains
about the off topic posting, and go about your business of posting scum.
Screw anybody new to the group, you guys own it, right? WRONG!!!!!!!!!

You have presented no defensible facts. You did not condemn Krause for
starting this. Think about yourself. What moral grounds do you have to speak
on your podium from? NOT ONE!!!!! None of your replies have included a
condemnation of Krause. WHY!!!!

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

Tit for tat, except Krause is OK and Larry is not? Remember, Krause started
it. Oh, you conveniently forgot that eh?

You chose to jump in. You made the decision to criticize one and not the
other. Ergo, you are an off topic posting liberal abetting hypocrite. You
made your own name a hypocritical pile of dog dirt. Two faced prick.

You're full of it. No high horses or statues for you!!!!!

Thomas Rangier


Krause's post was prefaced with 'OT'. Larry's post was not. Of course, the OT
could have dropped from Larry's post earlier (which, I believe, it did), but
that would have prevented Gene from seeing the post only the first time.
Apparently MS Outlook, or some other software, drops the 'OT' preface when one
responds to an OT 'OT' post.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:59:53 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats
it
is
all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of
the
highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in
rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having
dockside
conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your
sorry
ass out.


I simply don't understand your position. Initially, I made the
conscious decision not to filter people, but to filter "off topic"
content, as far as I could. If Harry chooses to post off topic I won't
see it... just as if *you* post off topic... if my filters are working
properly, I won't see that either.

Enter the "smithers" characters... and, frankly, this didn't start
with smithers, I realized that there was a new breed of netizen that
came to rec.boats only to cause trouble. Philosophically, I had a
problem with this.... this meant that in order to filter this sort of
person, I had to filter on a "name." The vandals soon caught on to
this, so I began to filter on the basis of news-server.... and,
frankly, this evolving filter technology has served me quite well. 99%
of what I see is boating related...

Early on, Netsock was publicly posting his "liberal" hit list aka as a
killfile. Far from hypocritical, I don't choose sides, but filter
*all* political posts.... included in my "hot list" are many political
terms... whether you post "democrats suck" or republicans suck," I
won't see your post. In fact... having said either democrat or
republican... I won't even see my own post.... and if you wish me to
see any response to same, you'll have to edit out all "political"
content.

Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you
are.


See far deeper than I do, O wise one....

In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I
have
no
respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because
of
your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You
come
swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't
expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel.


If you are going to post ill of me... at least spell my name
right......

and just so I'll understand, could you repost what I said that was
hypocritical?

Oh... nevermind. I see I'm in your killfile....

No, I told said I wasn't going to killfile you. In fact, I want to see
every
hypocrisy you post.

It is just fine and dandy by you for Krause to pollute this newsgroup like
a
trashy old boys club. Just filter everyone you don't like, or complains
about the off topic posting, and go about your business of posting scum.
Screw anybody new to the group, you guys own it, right? WRONG!!!!!!!!!

You have presented no defensible facts. You did not condemn Krause for
starting this. Think about yourself. What moral grounds do you have to
speak
on your podium from? NOT ONE!!!!! None of your replies have included a
condemnation of Krause. WHY!!!!

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

Tit for tat, except Krause is OK and Larry is not? Remember, Krause
started
it. Oh, you conveniently forgot that eh?

You chose to jump in. You made the decision to criticize one and not the
other. Ergo, you are an off topic posting liberal abetting hypocrite. You
made your own name a hypocritical pile of dog dirt. Two faced prick.

You're full of it. No high horses or statues for you!!!!!

Thomas Rangier


Krause's post was prefaced with 'OT'. Larry's post was not
John H



Binary thinking get it wrong when you don't check the facts. The original
post by Larry was prefaced OT. Look back and see for yourself. No excuses
there.

Thomas Rangier

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:26:13 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:59:53 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats
it
is
all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of
the
highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in
rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having
dockside
conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your
sorry
ass out.


I simply don't understand your position. Initially, I made the
conscious decision not to filter people, but to filter "off topic"
content, as far as I could. If Harry chooses to post off topic I won't
see it... just as if *you* post off topic... if my filters are working
properly, I won't see that either.

Enter the "smithers" characters... and, frankly, this didn't start
with smithers, I realized that there was a new breed of netizen that
came to rec.boats only to cause trouble. Philosophically, I had a
problem with this.... this meant that in order to filter this sort of
person, I had to filter on a "name." The vandals soon caught on to
this, so I began to filter on the basis of news-server.... and,
frankly, this evolving filter technology has served me quite well. 99%
of what I see is boating related...

Early on, Netsock was publicly posting his "liberal" hit list aka as a
killfile. Far from hypocritical, I don't choose sides, but filter
*all* political posts.... included in my "hot list" are many political
terms... whether you post "democrats suck" or republicans suck," I
won't see your post. In fact... having said either democrat or
republican... I won't even see my own post.... and if you wish me to
see any response to same, you'll have to edit out all "political"
content.

Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you
are.


See far deeper than I do, O wise one....

In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I
have
no
respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because
of
your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You
come
swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't
expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel.


If you are going to post ill of me... at least spell my name
right......

and just so I'll understand, could you repost what I said that was
hypocritical?

Oh... nevermind. I see I'm in your killfile....

No, I told said I wasn't going to killfile you. In fact, I want to see
every
hypocrisy you post.

It is just fine and dandy by you for Krause to pollute this newsgroup like
a
trashy old boys club. Just filter everyone you don't like, or complains
about the off topic posting, and go about your business of posting scum.
Screw anybody new to the group, you guys own it, right? WRONG!!!!!!!!!

You have presented no defensible facts. You did not condemn Krause for
starting this. Think about yourself. What moral grounds do you have to
speak
on your podium from? NOT ONE!!!!! None of your replies have included a
condemnation of Krause. WHY!!!!

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

Tit for tat, except Krause is OK and Larry is not? Remember, Krause
started
it. Oh, you conveniently forgot that eh?

You chose to jump in. You made the decision to criticize one and not the
other. Ergo, you are an off topic posting liberal abetting hypocrite. You
made your own name a hypocritical pile of dog dirt. Two faced prick.

You're full of it. No high horses or statues for you!!!!!

Thomas Rangier


Krause's post was prefaced with 'OT'. Larry's post was not
John H



Binary thinking get it wrong when you don't check the facts. The original
post by Larry was prefaced OT. Look back and see for yourself. No excuses
there.

Thomas Rangier


Did Gene, in fact, look at the original post or one of the followup with the OT
removed?

If you can answer that in the affirmative, you're psychic.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:26:13 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:54:28 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:59:53 -0400, "Thomas Rangier"
wrote:


Just as I thought, if a left winger wants to make trouble in rec.boats
it
is
all OK with you. You are as bad as Harry, actually worse. A hypocrite of
the
highest order. Go have your dockside political conversations in
rec.boats.cruising. See how long you last. I don't see you having
dockside
conversations about politics there. Why? Because they would boot your
sorry
ass out.


I simply don't understand your position. Initially, I made the
conscious decision not to filter people, but to filter "off topic"
content, as far as I could. If Harry chooses to post off topic I won't
see it... just as if *you* post off topic... if my filters are working
properly, I won't see that either.

Enter the "smithers" characters... and, frankly, this didn't start
with smithers, I realized that there was a new breed of netizen that
came to rec.boats only to cause trouble. Philosophically, I had a
problem with this.... this meant that in order to filter this sort of
person, I had to filter on a "name." The vandals soon caught on to
this, so I began to filter on the basis of news-server.... and,
frankly, this evolving filter technology has served me quite well. 99%
of what I see is boating related...

Early on, Netsock was publicly posting his "liberal" hit list aka as a
killfile. Far from hypocritical, I don't choose sides, but filter
*all* political posts.... included in my "hot list" are many political
terms... whether you post "democrats suck" or republicans suck," I
won't see your post. In fact... having said either democrat or
republican... I won't even see my own post.... and if you wish me to
see any response to same, you'll have to edit out all "political"
content.

Glad you answered me, now the whole world knows what a hypocrite you
are.


See far deeper than I do, O wise one....

In response to your response to Larry, you are indeed a hypocrite. I
have
no
respect for you and you can be the first to enter my killfiles because
of
your double standards. At least Harry is a man about his position. You
come
swooping in with dual standards. The Grand Pubba Almighty Kerns. Don't
expect me to bow. Maybe spit up some bowel.


If you are going to post ill of me... at least spell my name
right......

and just so I'll understand, could you repost what I said that was
hypocritical?

Oh... nevermind. I see I'm in your killfile....

No, I told said I wasn't going to killfile you. In fact, I want to see
every
hypocrisy you post.

It is just fine and dandy by you for Krause to pollute this newsgroup like
a
trashy old boys club. Just filter everyone you don't like, or complains
about the off topic posting, and go about your business of posting scum.
Screw anybody new to the group, you guys own it, right? WRONG!!!!!!!!!

You have presented no defensible facts. You did not condemn Krause for
starting this. Think about yourself. What moral grounds do you have to
speak
on your podium from? NOT ONE!!!!! None of your replies have included a
condemnation of Krause. WHY!!!!

Krause posted OT: Uncle Sam Needs the Rec.Boats Righties...
Larry posted OT: rec.boats needs less left winged idjits

Tit for tat, except Krause is OK and Larry is not? Remember, Krause
started
it. Oh, you conveniently forgot that eh?

You chose to jump in. You made the decision to criticize one and not the
other. Ergo, you are an off topic posting liberal abetting hypocrite. You
made your own name a hypocritical pile of dog dirt. Two faced prick.

You're full of it. No high horses or statues for you!!!!!

Thomas Rangier


Krause's post was prefaced with 'OT'. Larry's post was not
John H



Binary thinking get it wrong when you don't check the facts. The original
post by Larry was prefaced OT. Look back and see for yourself. No excuses
there.

Thomas Rangier



PS. You might, in the future, quote all of a response, instead of only a
portion.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 12:58:04 -0400, "Gene Kearns"
wrote:

Heh heh...resorting to Krause lies now Gene? Perhaps you would like to
post
proof of this claim? Oh, cant do it? Guess that make you a liar.


I don't have to prove anything. A few years ago, I'm the one that
caught you trolling and then posting back under (yet) another alias to
tell yourself what a great guy Chris really was. Remember your
mistake? I'll refresh your memory.... same IP address. Not very
bright, huh? Now we have nym servers... right?

Been addressed. It was a student in my office. Your speculations are just
that...(wrong) assumptions.

LOL, poor Gene-o has been beating this dead horse for quite some time now.
Hey Gene, why not just lie, and say it IS me?


Proof that I've been beating that horse? Thought not.

Yes. You have repeated this claim many times. You sound like a broken
record.

I don't have any conclusive proof and I never posted that I did have.

Of course you dont.

However, if it smells like a duck, walks like a duck, looks like a
duck, and quacks like a duck.... forgive my foolish observation that
it probably is a duck....

Your problem is that you dont know what a duck is.

The fact that you don't find the smithers sort of behavior
objectionable.... well, that speaks volumes.

LOL! Yea Gene...lets get serious about this wreck of a newsgroup on Usenet,
and how people "act" here. yea, thats the ticket.

Point to just *one* lie that I've told....

You said my Father has a jet boat.

If you've gone to the trouble of searching for my address... surely
you know that I have another address within sight of the Atlantic
Ocean and the ICW.... My boat is .3 mile from salt water

So you say.

... how about
yours?

A mere 2 hours from Lake Erie Gene. Close enough to go for the day...which I
have done many times. Ever hear of lake Erie Gene?

Youre sounding more like Krause every day.

Now go away.

--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/

On Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:01:49 -0400, "Gene Kearns"
wrote:

Again.... *you* used to post that it was your father's boat.

Never.

I said my Father helped build it. As did my brother and other family
memebers and friends. That still makes the boat mine.

Were you
lying then or now.... or... did he sell it to you... since you now
are implying ownership?

You are just like Krause. Repeat your lies long eneough, and even you will
start believing them.

The fact that your posts aren't archived doesn't prove or disprove
anything.

All my posts are archived. I have never blocked any of them. If you say I
posted it was my Fathers boat, then it is there.

Whats the matter Gene, couldnt find it, so now you fabricate another lie
that I must block archiving of my posts?

What a pathetic exsistence you must have...

Go away little man...

--
-Netsock

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."
http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/