Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Guynn wrote:
Have you ever considered strapping a tank to your back and checking out what the surface of the water looks like from the other side? You might be amazed. I've got limited kayaking experience, but I'd much rather swim with the fishes. Did, do both. Kayaking is great, for the sport itself, for the social aspects, for the nature experience. There is wildlife and calmness above the surface, too. You can take a small tent, mat, sleeping bag, something to cook, it, catch fish, and vanish into wildlife. Only to meet dozens of others doing the same, sometimes ;-) Unfortunately there are not yet real camo kayaks. Too difficult melting with the surface. Matthias PS: we take minor scuba equipment to learn rolls ;-) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"And what of the dolphin who kills the shark, yet eats his fill of
sardines? The problem with sardines is that they are designed to be eaten....." See what I mean? Typical Conservative: the sardines are designed to be eaten, probably designed by God... Has it ever crossed your mind that they are living creatures, no worse than sharks? Why then we don't pick on them? They are ugly for one... Well man, I got news for you, sardines are pretty and they have the right to cooperate to survive. By the way, dolphins (save for a few) belong with the little fish because they are smart and also cute. I think there's another Law of the Jungle that says (or ought to say) SURVIVAL OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Just like a pack of Wolves ha? Yeah They are efficient predators. The
needs of the PACK outweigh the needs of the individual, But wait with in the PACK there is always the Alpha male & Alpha female. How does that quote go, we are all equal but some of us are more equal then others.." Predators do cooperate all the time, and you can observe it at the Tundra, the Jungle or the United Nations... All the more reason for the little fish to get together and cooperate. They won't be the exactly the same (a lie planted by communism) but it will ensure them SURVIVAL AND LIVING WITHOUT THE PREDATOR. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"donquijote1954" wrote in message oups.com... All the more reason for the little fish to get together and cooperate. They won't be the exactly the same (a lie planted by communism) but it will ensure them SURVIVAL AND LIVING WITHOUT THE PREDATOR. Pure propaganda perpetuated by the FLA (1). The AASP(2) has been fighting this prejudice for decades now with little inroads into breaking down the misconception towards Aquatic Predators. APs are not the fishes' enemies, they are helping to remove the weaklings that, if allowed to survive, would weaken their respective species and therefore their ability to survive. DO NOT believe the lies of the FLA, we will be more then happy to meet with any independent thinkers of the fish contingency to go over the facts. Any place, anytime, just don't forget to bring the tartar sauce. (1) Fish Liberation Army (2) Association for the Advancement of Sharks & Piranhas |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Don Freeman wrote: "donquijote1954" wrote in message oups.com... All the more reason for the little fish to get together and cooperate. They won't be the exactly the same (a lie planted by communism) but it will ensure them SURVIVAL AND LIVING WITHOUT THE PREDATOR. Pure propaganda perpetuated by the FLA (1). The AASP(2) has been fighting this prejudice for decades now with little inroads into breaking down the misconception towards Aquatic Predators. APs are not the fishes' enemies, they are helping to remove the weaklings that, if allowed to survive, would weaken their respective species and therefore their ability to survive. DO NOT believe the lies of the FLA, we will be more then happy to meet with any independent thinkers of the fish contingency to go over the facts. Any place, anytime, just don't forget to bring the tartar sauce. (1) Fish Liberation Army (2) Association for the Advancement of Sharks & Piranhas You shall not trust the AASP. They have been canning sardines for the last one hundred years. If they mean good, we can only negotiate with sharks in cages. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
donquijote1954 wrote:
"And what of the dolphin who kills the shark, yet eats his fill of sardines? The problem with sardines is that they are designed to be eaten....." See what I mean? Typical Conservative: the sardines are designed to be eaten, probably designed by God... Has it ever crossed your mind that they are living creatures, no worse than sharks? Why then we don't pick on them? They are ugly for one... Well man, I got news for you, sardines are pretty and they have the right to cooperate to survive. By the way, dolphins (save for a few) belong with the little fish because they are smart and also cute. I think there's another Law of the Jungle that says (or ought to say) SURVIVAL OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL. And I ought to be rich, and you ought to be more intelligent. But that's the way the world works. -- Your ridiculous little opinion has been noted. My diesel truck has been modified to run on an environmentally friendly mixture of clean burning Caribou fat and whale oil. "Tolerance is the virtue of a man without convictions" G.K. Chesterton |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
dazed and confuzzed wrote: I think there's another Law of the Jungle that says (or ought to say) SURVIVAL OF THE MOST BEAUTIFUL. And I ought to be rich, and you ought to be more intelligent. But that's the way the world works. And the shark ought to be less hungry. I mean, this is NOT about survival for the predator, but just a bulimic shark. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Are there Conservative Kayakers? | General | |||
Kayakers as Terrorists | General | |||
OT Conservative pigs! What do you think NOW? | General |