On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 02:27:30 GMT, Mark Sprague
wrote:

You're ass-uming that the bicyclist doesn't drive, therefore doesn't
pay. I cycle, and have been driving and paying for 40 years. I think
my share is paid for by now.

You might also want to think about road wear caused by 30-lb bicycle
and 180-lb rider at 20 mph vs. 4800-lb SUV and 180-lb driver at 60
mph.

But isn't it really about a lard-butt, sedentary SUV-jockey feeling a
little guilt when he sees someone getting some exercise, while he is
too lazy to do anything but wait passively for the coming heart
attack?

I could be wrong... ;^)


Another way to look at it. That guy in the SUV is paying road use taxes
with every gallon of gasoline that he buys. The bicyclist isn't paying
his way.

seldom_seen wrote:

On Tue, 02 Aug 2005 02:27:30 GMT, Mark Sprague
wrote:

You're ass-uming that the bicyclist doesn't drive, therefore doesn't
pay. I cycle, and have been driving and paying for 40 years. I think
my share is paid for by now.

You might also want to think about road wear caused by 30-lb bicycle
and 180-lb rider at 20 mph vs. 4800-lb SUV and 180-lb driver at 60
mph.

But isn't it really about a lard-butt, sedentary SUV-jockey feeling a
little guilt when he sees someone getting some exercise, while he is
too lazy to do anything but wait passively for the coming heart
attack?

I could be wrong... ;^)



It's more a case of a county dweller who has to spend his time dodging
all the idiot city bicyclists who have DRIVEN all the way out here to
pedal around for a couple of hours, and then DRIVE back.

I assume that on the drive back they congratulate one another on having
such an ecologically-sound hobby.

I could be wrong.