wrote in message
oups.com...
Chuck you are a do-gooder through and through.

Have a nice day. Go ruin another thread.


************

followed on with "the dock PERSON likely knows more about
boats and boat handling than many of the people he or she is fueling
up."


Where did I say that Chuck? Making up lies again?

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
Chuck you are a do-gooder through and through.

Have a nice day. Go ruin another thread.


************

followed on with "the dock PERSON likely knows more about
boats and boat handling than many of the people he or she is fueling
up."


Where did I say that Chuck? Making up lies again?



Well, where did I say that Chuck? If you are man enough you can apologize
for your mistake.

On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:05:06 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
Chuck you are a do-gooder through and through.

Have a nice day. Go ruin another thread.


************

followed on with "the dock PERSON likely knows more about
boats and boat handling than many of the people he or she is fueling
up."


Where did I say that Chuck? Making up lies again?



Well, where did I say that Chuck? If you are man enough you can apologize
for your mistake.


Sounds very basskisserish, JimH.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:05:06 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
Chuck you are a do-gooder through and through.

Have a nice day. Go ruin another thread.


************

followed on with "the dock PERSON likely knows more about
boats and boat handling than many of the people he or she is fueling
up."


Where did I say that Chuck? Making up lies again?



Well, where did I say that Chuck? If you are man enough you can apologize
for your mistake.


Sounds very basskisserish, JimH.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

I thought the same thing after I wrote it. I guess I am tired of Chuck
twisting around what I actually wrote so he can make *his* case. He
actually had the gall to use quotes to make it appear that is actually what
I wrote.

Just for the record, I wrote "And in some cases the dock person (why do you
call him *boy*?) may have more experience in boating than the operators of
the boats he/she is refueling or
pumping out."

Take a look at what Chuck claimed I said: "the dock PERSON likely knows
more about
boats and boat handling than many of the people he or she is fueling up."

Bull****....and he knows it.

I know I will not get any sort of apology or recognition from Chuck that he
made a mistake. After all, that sort of thing requires you to be a real
man.

On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 16:01:46 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


"John H" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:05:06 -0400, "*JimH*" wrote:


"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
Chuck you are a do-gooder through and through.

Have a nice day. Go ruin another thread.


************

followed on with "the dock PERSON likely knows more about
boats and boat handling than many of the people he or she is fueling
up."


Where did I say that Chuck? Making up lies again?



Well, where did I say that Chuck? If you are man enough you can apologize
for your mistake.


Sounds very basskisserish, JimH.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

I thought the same thing after I wrote it. I guess I am tired of Chuck
twisting around what I actually wrote so he can make *his* case. He
actually had the gall to use quotes to make it appear that is actually what
I wrote.

Just for the record, I wrote "And in some cases the dock person (why do you
call him *boy*?) may have more experience in boating than the operators of
the boats he/she is refueling or
pumping out."

Take a look at what Chuck claimed I said: "the dock PERSON likely knows
more about
boats and boat handling than many of the people he or she is fueling up."

Bull****....and he knows it.

I know I will not get any sort of apology or recognition from Chuck that he
made a mistake. After all, that sort of thing requires you to be a real
man.


I believe Chuck changed the word to 'person' (in caps to show the difference)
because you questioned his use of the word 'boy'. (Although I've never seen a
dock 'girl'!)



--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

*JimH* wrote:
"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...
Chuck you are a do-gooder through and through.

Have a nice day. Go ruin another thread.


************

followed on with "the dock PERSON likely knows more about
boats and boat handling than many of the people he or she is fueling
up."


Where did I say that Chuck? Making up lies again?



Well, where did I say that Chuck? If you are man enough you can apologize
for your mistake.

Jim, when I prove that I'm not Kevin Noble, will YOU be man enough to
apologize?