Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
John Gaquin
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message

THE ROOF, THE ROOF, THE ROOF IS ON FIRE...:


Pretty risky, bassy, don't you think...... gong off on your own like this?
Shouldn't you wait to read what Mark Morford writes?


  #2   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default



John Gaquin wrote:
wrote in message

THE ROOF, THE ROOF, THE ROOF IS ON FIRE...:


Pretty risky, bassy, don't you think...... gong off on your own like this?
Shouldn't you wait to read what Mark Morford writes?


Pretty risky, John, don't you think.......trying to spell GOING on your
own?

  #3   Report Post  
*JimH*
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
oups.com...


John Gaquin wrote:
wrote in message

THE ROOF, THE ROOF, THE ROOF IS ON FIRE...:


Pretty risky, bassy, don't you think...... gong off on your own like
this?
Shouldn't you wait to read what Mark Morford writes?


Pretty risky, John, don't you think.......trying to spell GOING on your
own?


Ah, so we are back on the *bash folks for misspelling* kick. Game on Kevin.


  #4   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default



*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


John Gaquin wrote:
wrote in message

THE ROOF, THE ROOF, THE ROOF IS ON FIRE...:

Pretty risky, bassy, don't you think...... gong off on your own like
this?
Shouldn't you wait to read what Mark Morford writes?


Pretty risky, John, don't you think.......trying to spell GOING on your
own?


Ah, so we are back on the *bash folks for misspelling* kick. Game on Kevin.


Are you going to answer my question, Jim? When I prove that you were
dead wrong about me being Kevin Noble, will you be man enough to
apologize? Game on, huh? Shall I start posting many, many lies about
you every single day? Shall I start you and Fritz's habit of childish
name calling and even more childish insults?

  #5   Report Post  
*JimH*
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


John Gaquin wrote:
wrote in message

THE ROOF, THE ROOF, THE ROOF IS ON FIRE...:

Pretty risky, bassy, don't you think...... gong off on your own like
this?
Shouldn't you wait to read what Mark Morford writes?

Pretty risky, John, don't you think.......trying to spell GOING on your
own?


Ah, so we are back on the *bash folks for misspelling* kick. Game on
Kevin.


Are you going to answer my question, Jim? When I prove that you were
dead wrong about me being Kevin Noble, will you be man enough to
apologize?



First answer my question. Exactly how are you going to *prove* that you are
not Kevin Noble?


Game on, huh?



Yep.


Shall I start posting many, many lies about
you every single day?



Be my guest.


Shall I start you and Fritz's habit of childish
name calling and even more childish insults?


*Start*? ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!! When did you *stop*?




  #6   Report Post  
John Gaquin
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message

Pretty risky, John, don't you think.......trying to spell GOING on your
own?


Well, you've caught me now, bassy! I must confess that I do occasionally
make a typo.

The only substantive response I can offer is a query of my own, quoting one
of your very own sentences, posted just 24 minutes *after* you so cleverly
caught my typo:

"If Bush didn't believe the data in presented to him, why did
he knowing allow one of his henchmen, who is not a scientist or
climatologist, alter data????"

Summary for emphasis: "...believe the data in presented to him, ...did
he knowing allow one... not a...climatologist, alter data????..."


Now tell me, bassy -- should I and others on the NG use your above example
as a model for future grammar and sentence structure? Enquiring minds want
to know.....


LOL




  #7   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default



John Gaquin wrote:
wrote in message

Pretty risky, John, don't you think.......trying to spell GOING on your
own?


Well, you've caught me now, bassy! I must confess that I do occasionally
make a typo.

The only substantive response I can offer is a query of my own, quoting one
of your very own sentences, posted just 24 minutes *after* you so cleverly
caught my typo:

"If Bush didn't believe the data in presented to him, why did
he knowing allow one of his henchmen, who is not a scientist or
climatologist, alter data????"

Summary for emphasis: "...believe the data in presented to him, ...did
he knowing allow one... not a...climatologist, alter data????..."


Now tell me, bassy -- should I and others on the NG use your above example
as a model for future grammar and sentence structure? Enquiring minds want
to know.....


LOL


At least I can spell going.....

  #8   Report Post  
Tim
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, you've caught me now, bassy! I must confess that I do
occasionally
make a typo. ..."

yeah, but you're quick to point at the speck in others eyes, and ignore
the log in your own.

  #9   Report Post  
John Gaquin
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tim" wrote in message

yeah, but you're quick to point at the speck in others eyes, and ignore
the log in your own.



I disagree.


  #10   Report Post  
Shortwave Sportfishing
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 17 Jun 2005 05:34:42 -0700, wrote:

Neither do I. :)

Later,

Tom


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Who voted for Bush v Kerry Dr. Dr. Smithers General 48 November 6th 04 12:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017