wrote in message

Pretty risky, John, don't you think.......trying to spell GOING on your
own?

Well, you've caught me now, bassy! I must confess that I do occasionally
make a typo.

The only substantive response I can offer is a query of my own, quoting one
of your very own sentences, posted just 24 minutes *after* you so cleverly
caught my typo:

"If Bush didn't believe the data in presented to him, why did
he knowing allow one of his henchmen, who is not a scientist or
climatologist, alter data????"

Summary for emphasis: "...believe the data in presented to him, ...did
he knowing allow one... not a...climatologist, alter data????..."


Now tell me, bassy -- should I and others on the NG use your above example
as a model for future grammar and sentence structure? Enquiring minds want
to know.....


LOL

John Gaquin wrote:
wrote in message

Pretty risky, John, don't you think.......trying to spell GOING on your
own?

Well, you've caught me now, bassy! I must confess that I do occasionally
make a typo.

The only substantive response I can offer is a query of my own, quoting one
of your very own sentences, posted just 24 minutes *after* you so cleverly
caught my typo:

"If Bush didn't believe the data in presented to him, why did
he knowing allow one of his henchmen, who is not a scientist or
climatologist, alter data????"

Summary for emphasis: "...believe the data in presented to him, ...did
he knowing allow one... not a...climatologist, alter data????..."


Now tell me, bassy -- should I and others on the NG use your above example
as a model for future grammar and sentence structure? Enquiring minds want
to know.....


LOL

At least I can spell going.....

Well, you've caught me now, bassy! I must confess that I do
occasionally
make a typo. ..."

yeah, but you're quick to point at the speck in others eyes, and ignore
the log in your own.

"Tim" wrote in message

yeah, but you're quick to point at the speck in others eyes, and ignore
the log in your own.


I disagree.