"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:


You are correct Kevin. I should not have called you an idiot for not
knowing what you post within the same thread from one minute to another.
I should not have called you an idiot for starting this thread. I
should not have called you an idiot because you point out typos made by
others when you don't know the difference between the words 'they're"
and 'there'.

Calling you an idiot was actually a compliment to you. I *should* have
called you brainless.

Don't you, Ftitz, Herring, Smithers, et al, have anything more useful to
do with your time than continue your piling on Bass over and over and
over and over?

I mean, if any of you ever had anything clever to say, ok...but you four
can't seem to write a witty topical sentence.

Sheesh.



You are basically correct Harry. But the problem is he never stopped with
the name calling and insults when he was asked to stop. I also defended
the guy in hopes he would change. Never again.

Live by the sword and die by the sword. He deserves everything that is
directed at him.

wrote in message
oups.com...


Tim wrote:
Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm!

Very safe fun, and brilliantly smart.

Duh

I take it you must have led a sheltered life under mommy's apron, huh?
Was everything you done as a child "brilliantly smart"? If so, how did
you ever learn anything? Or....perhaps you never DID learn anything.


So what did you learn by getting shot repeatedly in the head by bb's?


BTW: "Was everything you done as a child..." ???? What's up with that?
And you have the balls to call others on the carpet for their typos?

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


Tim wrote:
Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm!

Very safe fun, and brilliantly smart.

Duh

I take it you must have led a sheltered life under mommy's apron, huh?
Was everything you done as a child "brilliantly smart"? If so, how did
you ever learn anything? Or....perhaps you never DID learn anything.


So what did you learn by getting shot repeatedly in the head by bb's?

I can't think of anybody else who would believe shooting bb guns at each
other is an acceptable form of play for kids. What a mar00n




BTW: "Was everything you done as a child..." ???? What's up with that?
And you have the balls to call others on the carpet for their typos?

Everything kevin did as a child must have been brilliant in the eye of his
parents, since they were obviously mental midgets.

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


John H wrote:
On 17 Jun 2005 05:48:03 -0700, wrote:



Larry wrote:
On 17 Jun 2005 04:53:32 -0700, wrote:



Tim wrote:
They were sitting on a small
hill by a state hwy. and took a couple of shots at passing
cars
with a
Daisy BB gun!


No big deal unless that BB hit you, right?

Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm!

Have 2 eyes now? If so, you are lucky. Other's were not. Like I
said,
kids
shooting bb guns has ruined a man's life. It is inexcusable to
shoot
at
passing cars.

So, you agree that they should be charged with Terroristic
acts????
Hmm, I find it odd that you right wingers are pro gun, except when
it
comes to something personal. And sure, it's wrong to shoot at
passing
cars, who said it wasn't? But, I'll tell you this, with a little
Daisy,
by the time that bb gets to the car, it's going REAL SLOW. Should
we
outlaw sticks, too? They've been known to take people's eyes out.
Hell,
maybe even more eyes have been lost to sticks. The Consumer
Product
Safety Commission estimates that in 2003, there were 550,000 to
600,000
injuries associated with bicycles and 97,640 injuries from
skateboards
that required emergency room treatment, compared with 19,504 for
air
guns -- including the high-powered air guns.

I know, I shouldn't say anything to you, so I'll be nice.

Even if the bb is going 'very' slow, wouldn't the speed of the car
still
be able
to cause the impact to be severe? Did you ever see what a small
rock,
going very
slow, does to the windshield of a car going 60mph?

Oh, ****!!!! I spilled my water bottle laughing at that!!! Hmm, that
would mean that the kids would have to be in FRONT of the vehicle.
If
they were behind then the car could be going faster than the bb.
Would
that make the driver of the CAR guilty of terroristic threats?

The law in Georgia specifies terroristic acts.

I didn't say "terroristic acts", it's great how you twist things to
make it sound like you know what you're talking about. I said
"terroristic THREATS". Show me that GA law.

No? I guess you don't even know what you initially posted. Here is
one
sentence from that post of yours: "Now, a couple of young boys in
northern
GA were arrested for "terroristic acts"."

Idiot.



Are you asking for
agreement/disagreement with the laws of Georgia? Why? So your slam
at
DHS
will
make sense?

How about just saying, "OK, I made a mistake."
--
John H

Yes,

Good. Time to move on Kevin.

Oh, Jim, can you possibly get more childish?? I thought that sort of
**** was beneath you, and I was certainly correct in my assumptions
that you've reverted back to your childish actions. You should be
ashamed of yourself. You deliberately snipped my reply to make it sound
like I was admitting something. I thought for awhile that you'd
changed, but by doing the above childish actions, you've proven
yourself worthy of Fritz's charms. Too bad you don't have the mental
capacity to debate something without stooping so damned low.


You are correct Kevin. I should not have called you an idiot for not
knowing what you post within the same thread from one minute to another.
I
should not have called you an idiot for starting this thread. I should
not
have called you an idiot because you point out typos made by others when
you
don't know the difference between the words 'they're" and 'there'.

Calling you an idiot was actually a compliment to you. I *should* have
called you brainless.

This whole thread is priceless........classic kevin noble
stupidity.....but priceless.

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:33:13 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

*JimH* wrote:


You are correct Kevin. I should not have called you an idiot for not
knowing what you post within the same thread from one minute to another. I
should not have called you an idiot for starting this thread. I should not
have called you an idiot because you point out typos made by others when you
don't know the difference between the words 'they're" and 'there'.

Calling you an idiot was actually a compliment to you. I *should* have
called you brainless.

Don't you, Ftitz, Herring, Smithers, et al, have anything more useful to
do with your time than continue your piling on Bass over and over and
over and over?

I mean, if any of you ever had anything clever to say, ok...but you four
can't seem to write a witty topical sentence.

Sheesh.

Harry, is beekay sending you back-channels asking for help? Do you think he
*needs* your help?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:47:30 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:

John H wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:33:13 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:


*JimH* wrote:


You are correct Kevin. I should not have called you an idiot for not
knowing what you post within the same thread from one minute to another. I
should not have called you an idiot for starting this thread. I should not
have called you an idiot because you point out typos made by others when you
don't know the difference between the words 'they're" and 'there'.

Calling you an idiot was actually a compliment to you. I *should* have
called you brainless.

Don't you, Ftitz, Herring, Smithers, et al, have anything more useful to
do with your time than continue your piling on Bass over and over and
over and over?

I mean, if any of you ever had anything clever to say, ok...but you four
can't seem to write a witty topical sentence.

Sheesh.


Harry, is beekay sending you back-channels asking for help? Do you think he
*needs* your help?


No, he isn't. It's just a crashing bore watching Hertvik and you and (by
way of filtered headers) Fritz, Robbins, Smithers, et cetera, competing
for the bottom.

It wouldn't be so bad if *any* of you could write, but you can't.

I sure wish Skipper would come back. At least he could turn the
occasional wry phrase.



Dubya's Checklist for War:

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y13.../checklist.jpg

Harry, you almost made me cry.

"By way of filtered headers"....my ass. Why don't you stop that fantasy too?

One way you could reduce your suffering is by not reading the posts.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:47:30 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:33:13 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:


*JimH* wrote:


You are correct Kevin. I should not have called you an idiot for not
knowing what you post within the same thread from one minute to
another. I
should not have called you an idiot for starting this thread. I should
not
have called you an idiot because you point out typos made by others
when you
don't know the difference between the words 'they're" and 'there'.

Calling you an idiot was actually a compliment to you. I *should*
have
called you brainless.

Don't you, Ftitz, Herring, Smithers, et al, have anything more useful to
do with your time than continue your piling on Bass over and over and
over and over?

I mean, if any of you ever had anything clever to say, ok...but you four
can't seem to write a witty topical sentence.

Sheesh.


Harry, is beekay sending you back-channels asking for help? Do you think
he
*needs* your help?


No, he isn't. It's just a crashing bore watching Hertv and you and (by
way of filtered headers) Fritz, Robbins, Smithers, et cetera, competing
for the bottom.

It wouldn't be so bad if *any* of you could write, but you can't.

I sure wish Skipper would come back. At least he could turn the
occasional wry phrase.



Dubya's Checklist for War:

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y13.../checklist.jpg

Harry, you almost made me cry.

"By way of filtered headers"....my ass. Why don't you stop that fantasy
too?

One way you could reduce your suffering is by not reading the posts.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:47:30 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:33:13 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:


*JimH* wrote:


You are correct Kevin. I should not have called you an idiot for not
knowing what you post within the same thread from one minute to
another. I
should not have called you an idiot for starting this thread. I should
not
have called you an idiot because you point out typos made by others
when you
don't know the difference between the words 'they're" and 'there'.

Calling you an idiot was actually a compliment to you. I *should*
have
called you brainless.

Don't you, Ftitz, Herring, Smithers, et al, have anything more useful to
do with your time than continue your piling on Bass over and over and
over and over?

I mean, if any of you ever had anything clever to say, ok...but you four
can't seem to write a witty topical sentence.

Sheesh.


Harry, is beekay sending you back-channels asking for help? Do you think
he
*needs* your help?


No, he isn't. It's just a crashing bore watching Hertv and you and (by
way of filtered headers) Fritz, Robbins, Smithers, et cetera, competing
for the bottom.

It wouldn't be so bad if *any* of you could write, but you can't.

I sure wish Skipper would come back. At least he could turn the
occasional wry phrase.



Dubya's Checklist for War:

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y13.../checklist.jpg

Harry, you almost made me cry.

"By way of filtered headers"....my ass. Why don't you stop that fantasy
too?

One way you could reduce your suffering is by not reading the posts.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

He is the president of the "Obsessed with JohnH and JimH" club.

Just last week he said I was no longer filtered and that he never had you
filtered. This week it is a different story.

Go figure.

I thought he was obsessed with Smithers.


"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:47:30 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:33:13 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:


*JimH* wrote:


You are correct Kevin. I should not have called you an idiot for not
knowing what you post within the same thread from one minute to
another. I
should not have called you an idiot for starting this thread. I
should not
have called you an idiot because you point out typos made by others
when you
don't know the difference between the words 'they're" and 'there'.

Calling you an idiot was actually a compliment to you. I *should*
have
called you brainless.

Don't you, Ftitz, Herring, Smithers, et al, have anything more useful
to
do with your time than continue your piling on Bass over and over and
over and over?

I mean, if any of you ever had anything clever to say, ok...but you
four
can't seem to write a witty topical sentence.

Sheesh.


Harry, is beekay sending you back-channels asking for help? Do you
think he
*needs* your help?


No, he isn't. It's just a crashing bore watching Hertv and you and (by
way of filtered headers) Fritz, Robbins, Smithers, et cetera, competing
for the bottom.

It wouldn't be so bad if *any* of you could write, but you can't.

I sure wish Skipper would come back. At least he could turn the
occasional wry phrase.



Dubya's Checklist for War:

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y13.../checklist.jpg

Harry, you almost made me cry.

"By way of filtered headers"....my ass. Why don't you stop that fantasy
too?

One way you could reduce your suffering is by not reading the posts.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

He is the president of the "Obsessed with JohnH and JimH" club.

Just last week he said I was no longer filtered and that he never had you
filtered. This week it is a different story.

Go figure.

He is obsessed with anyone who has caught him in a lie and tries hard to
smear their character.

An old political tactic....don't confront the real issue but attack the
messenger.

Pretty funny stuff.


"John Jay" wrote in message
...
I thought he was obsessed with Smithers.


"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 17:47:30 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:

John H wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:33:13 -0400, HarryKrause
wrote:


*JimH* wrote:


You are correct Kevin. I should not have called you an idiot for not
knowing what you post within the same thread from one minute to
another. I
should not have called you an idiot for starting this thread. I
should not
have called you an idiot because you point out typos made by others
when you
don't know the difference between the words 'they're" and 'there'.

Calling you an idiot was actually a compliment to you. I *should*
have
called you brainless.

Don't you, Ftitz, Herring, Smithers, et al, have anything more useful
to
do with your time than continue your piling on Bass over and over and
over and over?

I mean, if any of you ever had anything clever to say, ok...but you
four
can't seem to write a witty topical sentence.

Sheesh.


Harry, is beekay sending you back-channels asking for help? Do you
think he
*needs* your help?


No, he isn't. It's just a crashing bore watching Hertv and you and (by
way of filtered headers) Fritz, Robbins, Smithers, et cetera, competing
for the bottom.

It wouldn't be so bad if *any* of you could write, but you can't.

I sure wish Skipper would come back. At least he could turn the
occasional wry phrase.



Dubya's Checklist for War:

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y13.../checklist.jpg

Harry, you almost made me cry.

"By way of filtered headers"....my ass. Why don't you stop that fantasy
too?

One way you could reduce your suffering is by not reading the posts.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

He is the president of the "Obsessed with JohnH and JimH" club.

Just last week he said I was no longer filtered and that he never had you
filtered. This week it is a different story.

Go figure.