|
Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm!
Very safe fun, and brilliantly smart. Duh |
Hmm, I find it odd that you right wingers are pro gun, except when it
comes to something personal. When it comes to somthing personal???? I'm deffinately pro-gun. ALL firearms ( that includes BB and pellet OR maybe you exclude those) should be used in a legal, lawful manner. |
On 17 Jun 2005 09:05:35 -0700, "Tim" wrote:
Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm! Very safe fun, and brilliantly smart. Duh Piffle. Really smart people use bottle rockets. |
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 07:57:35 -0400, HarryKrause wrote:
wrote: Tim wrote: They were sitting on a small hill by a state hwy. and took a couple of shots at passing cars with a Daisy BB gun! No big deal unless that BB hit you, right? Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm! We used to have blackberry fights on my mother's aunt's farm somewhere near Revere, Massachusetts. That's about all I remember of that place. Harry, it is obvious from remarks you've made that you care a great deal for basskisser, so why don't you tell him to email prospective posts to you for review before he makes a fool of himself? -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking." |
John H wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 05:48:03 -0700, wrote: Larry wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 04:53:32 -0700, wrote: Tim wrote: They were sitting on a small hill by a state hwy. and took a couple of shots at passing cars with a Daisy BB gun! No big deal unless that BB hit you, right? Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm! Have 2 eyes now? If so, you are lucky. Other's were not. Like I said, kids shooting bb guns has ruined a man's life. It is inexcusable to shoot at passing cars. So, you agree that they should be charged with Terroristic acts???? Hmm, I find it odd that you right wingers are pro gun, except when it comes to something personal. And sure, it's wrong to shoot at passing cars, who said it wasn't? But, I'll tell you this, with a little Daisy, by the time that bb gets to the car, it's going REAL SLOW. Should we outlaw sticks, too? They've been known to take people's eyes out. Hell, maybe even more eyes have been lost to sticks. The Consumer Product Safety Commission estimates that in 2003, there were 550,000 to 600,000 injuries associated with bicycles and 97,640 injuries from skateboards that required emergency room treatment, compared with 19,504 for air guns -- including the high-powered air guns. I know, I shouldn't say anything to you, so I'll be nice. Even if the bb is going 'very' slow, wouldn't the speed of the car still be able to cause the impact to be severe? Did you ever see what a small rock, going very slow, does to the windshield of a car going 60mph? Oh, ****!!!! I spilled my water bottle laughing at that!!! Hmm, that would mean that the kids would have to be in FRONT of the vehicle. If they were behind then the car could be going faster than the bb. Would that make the driver of the CAR guilty of terroristic threats? The law in Georgia specifies terroristic acts. I didn't say "terroristic acts", it's great how you twist things to make it sound like you know what you're talking about. I said "terroristic THREATS". Show me that GA law. Are you asking for agreement/disagreement with the laws of Georgia? Why? So your slam at DHS will make sense? How about just saying, "OK, I made a mistake." -- John H Yes, how about saying just that, John. You made a mistake. |
John H wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 07:57:35 -0400, HarryKrause wrote: wrote: Tim wrote: They were sitting on a small hill by a state hwy. and took a couple of shots at passing cars with a Daisy BB gun! No big deal unless that BB hit you, right? Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm! We used to have blackberry fights on my mother's aunt's farm somewhere near Revere, Massachusetts. That's about all I remember of that place. Harry, it is obvious from remarks you've made that you care a great deal for basskisser, so why don't you tell him to email prospective posts to you for review before he makes a fool of himself? -- John H How have I done so, John? You've got "acts" mixed up with "threats", for starters. |
John Jay wrote: Kevin, Yes they would have arrested anyone who shot at passing cars with any gun, they would have arrested anyone who dropped something off a bridge on passing cars. The law they charge the person with is "Terroristic Threats". They have arrested and charged and people have been found guilty of such crimes for many years. I can remember in the 60's when kids were arrested and charged for Terroristic Threats for dropping pebbles off a bridge onto passing cars. I can also remember a time in the 70's when people were convicted of shooting a BB gun at the LI express. Oh, horse****! I lived in those days too, and never heard of such ****. Have any proof? Oh, and please, try to act like you know something, I'm not Kevin. The fact you do not believe the police would charge kids or anyone else for shooting at cars with a BB gun speaks volumes about you. Please show where I ever said such a thing! Quite the opposite. I said that they would charge someone with something, but NOT TERRORISTIC THREATS....please, try to follow.... Anyone with a brain are glad the police do not allow kids to shot BB guns at passing cars. Again, try to follow a train of thought, okay? Where to HELL did I say that kids should "be allowed" to shoot bb guns at passing cars? Oh, and it IS SHOOT, not shot. wrote in message oups.com... John Jay wrote: Kevin, I know you know people could be prosecuted for terrorist acts way before their was a Homeland Security Act. What makes you think this crime and the prosecution of this crime has anything to do with the Homeland Security Act? It's simple, try to follow along, okay? The Homeland Security Act simply made it easier to convict persons. Do you HONESTLY think that before the act, that they would arrest a couple of kids sitting on a hill with a damned BB gun shooting at the sides of cars with TERRORISTIC acts? Come on!!!!! You must make liberals cringe whenever you open you mouth. You are an embarrassment to liberals all over the world. And because of your narrow mindedness, you're an embarrassment to yourself! But, the Right Wing Circle Jerk Club will love you for it! |
wrote in message oups.com... John H wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 05:48:03 -0700, wrote: Larry wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 04:53:32 -0700, wrote: Tim wrote: They were sitting on a small hill by a state hwy. and took a couple of shots at passing cars with a Daisy BB gun! No big deal unless that BB hit you, right? Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm! Have 2 eyes now? If so, you are lucky. Other's were not. Like I said, kids shooting bb guns has ruined a man's life. It is inexcusable to shoot at passing cars. So, you agree that they should be charged with Terroristic acts???? Hmm, I find it odd that you right wingers are pro gun, except when it comes to something personal. And sure, it's wrong to shoot at passing cars, who said it wasn't? But, I'll tell you this, with a little Daisy, by the time that bb gets to the car, it's going REAL SLOW. Should we outlaw sticks, too? They've been known to take people's eyes out. Hell, maybe even more eyes have been lost to sticks. The Consumer Product Safety Commission estimates that in 2003, there were 550,000 to 600,000 injuries associated with bicycles and 97,640 injuries from skateboards that required emergency room treatment, compared with 19,504 for air guns -- including the high-powered air guns. I know, I shouldn't say anything to you, so I'll be nice. Even if the bb is going 'very' slow, wouldn't the speed of the car still be able to cause the impact to be severe? Did you ever see what a small rock, going very slow, does to the windshield of a car going 60mph? Oh, ****!!!! I spilled my water bottle laughing at that!!! Hmm, that would mean that the kids would have to be in FRONT of the vehicle. If they were behind then the car could be going faster than the bb. Would that make the driver of the CAR guilty of terroristic threats? The law in Georgia specifies terroristic acts. I didn't say "terroristic acts", it's great how you twist things to make it sound like you know what you're talking about. I said "terroristic THREATS". Show me that GA law. No? I guess you don't even know what you initially posted. Here is one sentence from that post of yours: "Now, a couple of young boys in northern GA were arrested for "terroristic acts"." Idiot. Are you asking for agreement/disagreement with the laws of Georgia? Why? So your slam at DHS will make sense? How about just saying, "OK, I made a mistake." -- John H Yes, Good. Time to move on Kevin. |
wrote in message oups.com... John H wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 05:48:03 -0700, wrote: Larry wrote: On 17 Jun 2005 04:53:32 -0700, wrote: Tim wrote: They were sitting on a small hill by a state hwy. and took a couple of shots at passing cars with a Daisy BB gun! No big deal unless that BB hit you, right? Hell, we used to have BB gun wars on my uncle's farm! Have 2 eyes now? If so, you are lucky. Other's were not. Like I said, kids shooting bb guns has ruined a man's life. It is inexcusable to shoot at passing cars. So, you agree that they should be charged with Terroristic acts???? Hmm, I find it odd that you right wingers are pro gun, except when it comes to something personal. And sure, it's wrong to shoot at passing cars, who said it wasn't? But, I'll tell you this, with a little Daisy, by the time that bb gets to the car, it's going REAL SLOW. Should we outlaw sticks, too? They've been known to take people's eyes out. Hell, maybe even more eyes have been lost to sticks. The Consumer Product Safety Commission estimates that in 2003, there were 550,000 to 600,000 injuries associated with bicycles and 97,640 injuries from skateboards that required emergency room treatment, compared with 19,504 for air guns -- including the high-powered air guns. I know, I shouldn't say anything to you, so I'll be nice. Even if the bb is going 'very' slow, wouldn't the speed of the car still be able to cause the impact to be severe? Did you ever see what a small rock, going very slow, does to the windshield of a car going 60mph? Oh, ****!!!! I spilled my water bottle laughing at that!!! Hmm, that would mean that the kids would have to be in FRONT of the vehicle. If they were behind then the car could be going faster than the bb. Would that make the driver of the CAR guilty of terroristic threats? The kid could be on the side of the road in front of the vehicle, on an overpass in front of the vehicle. I had a company car that got hit by a quart bottle of liquid dropped from an overpass and there was major damage to the window frame where it hit. Lucked out that he was a second slow in dropping or it would have come through the windshield. We have had people killed by people rocks dropped off overpasses, as well as snipers have killed people. Is a serious case of terrorism to the drivers when there is a sniper loose. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com