"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"Jim" wrote in message
...
So what happens when some of our guys are captured?


Their bodies are burned, they're chopped up with shovels, and then the
carcasses are hung from a bridge.

How would YOU treat a foriegn army that invaded your country, with no
provocation?

I'd shoot back if they shot at me. I know I wouldn't chop apart the burned
corpse however and hang it from a bridge. That'd be a waste of energy.



I suppose you hold that on par with chaining a bunch of naked insurgents
together and making them simulate sex acts on each other?

Yes?

Glad to know that you put it on par with mutilation of a corpse. It
confirms what I already knew about you.

"NOYB" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"Jim" wrote in message
...
So what happens when some of our guys are captured?


Their bodies are burned, they're chopped up with shovels, and then the
carcasses are hung from a bridge.

How would YOU treat a foriegn army that invaded your country, with no
provocation?

I'd shoot back if they shot at me. I know I wouldn't chop apart the burned
corpse however and hang it from a bridge. That'd be a waste of energy.

YOU are a "waste of energy". Do you not understand ANYTHING about what
it would be like to have a whole complete army invade YOUR country,
then automatically start telling you exactly what is good for you?



I suppose you hold that on par with chaining a bunch of naked insurgents
together and making them simulate sex acts on each other?

Yes?

Glad to know that you put it on par with mutilation of a corpse. It
confirms what I already knew about you.

Death is death.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"Jim" wrote in message
...
So what happens when some of our guys are captured?


Their bodies are burned, they're chopped up with shovels, and then
the
carcasses are hung from a bridge.

How would YOU treat a foriegn army that invaded your country, with no
provocation?

I'd shoot back if they shot at me. I know I wouldn't chop apart the
burned
corpse however and hang it from a bridge. That'd be a waste of energy.

YOU are a "waste of energy". Do you not understand ANYTHING about what
it would be like to have a whole complete army invade YOUR country,
then automatically start telling you exactly what is good for you?

Are you a buffoon? You are trying to provide justification for the attacks
against troops from your own country?

Many of the ones killing our troops are al Qaeda terrorists from other
countries. What's your *excuse* for them?




I suppose you hold that on par with chaining a bunch of naked
insurgents
together and making them simulate sex acts on each other?

Yes?

Glad to know that you put it on par with mutilation of a corpse. It
confirms what I already knew about you.

Death is death.

The insurgents who were piled naked in a pile, or leashed like a dog while
lying naked on the floor, did not die. So how can you even compare those
acts to what the terrorists did to those civilian contractors in Fallujah?

"NOYB" wrote in message
...


Are you a buffoon? You are trying to provide justification for the
attacks
against troops from your own country?


Separate issues - please answer the first question, and don't combine it in
any way with #2.

1) What behavior would you like to see from people who see us as an invader?
A massive letter-writing campaign?


2) Keep in mind that our own military brass have said they don't believe
that the bulk of the "insurgency" is coming from over the border. And, keep
in mind, also, that they have better information to back up this belief than
you or I will EVER have, at least until the history books are written. Do
you feel YOU have information that they don't?

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...


Are you a buffoon? You are trying to provide justification for the
attacks
against troops from your own country?


Separate issues - please answer the first question, and don't combine it
in
any way with #2.

1) What behavior would you like to see from people who see us as an
invader?
A massive letter-writing campaign?

It's been widely accepted that there are three groups that we're fighting:
1) former Baathists, 2) Shiites with Iranian backing, and 3) al Qaeda
terrorists from the surrounding Middle Eastern countries. None of them are
"lawful" combatants as defined by the Geneva Convention...and, thus, none
are entitled its protections.



2) Keep in mind that our own military brass have said they don't believe
that the bulk of the "insurgency" is coming from over the border.

I've seen where *some* of the commanders have said that, but I wouldn't say
that that's the general consensus.
In fact, most of the top guys say that the majority of the organized
terrorist/suicide attacks come from non-Iraqi combatants.

And, keep
in mind, also, that they have better information to back up this belief
than
you or I will EVER have, at least until the history books are written. Do
you feel YOU have information that they don't?

I guess that depends upon who you are talking about. Post just one or two
reputable links where one of our top guys says that the majority of the
enemy we're facing are Iraqi's...and I'll post half a dozen links in which
one of our top guys says that the most severe attacks are coming from
non-Iraqi terrorists.

NOYB wrote:


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...


Are you a buffoon? You are trying to provide justification for the
attacks
against troops from your own country?

I recognize the buffoon here, It isn't Doug.



Separate issues - please answer the first question, and don't combine it
in
any way with #2.

1) What behavior would you like to see from people who see us as an
invader?
A massive letter-writing campaign?

It's been widely accepted that there are three groups that we're fighting:
1) former Baathists, 2) Shiites with Iranian backing, and 3) al Qaeda
terrorists from the surrounding Middle Eastern countries. None of them
are "lawful" combatants as defined by the Geneva Convention...and, thus,
none are entitled its protections.



2) Keep in mind that our own military brass have said they don't believe
that the bulk of the "insurgency" is coming from over the border.

I've seen where *some* of the commanders have said that, but I wouldn't
say that that's the general consensus.

Based on your opinion. Opinions are like a$$holes, everybody has one.

In fact, most of the top guys say that the majority of the organized
terrorist/suicide attacks come from non-Iraqi combatants.

Bulls**t
What top guys, the ones in the "Fourth Riech"?


And, keep
in mind, also, that they have better information to back up this belief
than
you or I will EVER have, at least until the history books are written. Do
you feel YOU have information that they don't?

I guess that depends upon who you are talking about.

Who are you talking about?
Some "suck ups" that thinks they can advance their career by being the
"organ grinders monkey".

Post just one or two
reputable links where one of our top guys says that the majority of the
enemy we're facing are Iraqi's...and I'll post half a dozen links in which
one of our top guys says that the most severe attacks are coming from
non-Iraqi terrorists.

You ask for "reputable links" and offer links to what?
More "organ grinder monkeys" sites with their opinion that supports your
drivel.
This is all opinions, backed by nothing but lies.

Get your head out of the medicine chest.
Wipe the spittle off your keyboard.

Your posts don't deserve serious consideration anymore!!!

Go to hell!!!

--
_______m___õ¿~___m_________________________
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office
of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability,
preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
- oath of office - We need someone who understands this promise.

"NOYB" wrote in message news:eJidnYHYaoxzewPdRVn-

I see from the post above that Mr. Oh-so-clever-anonymous-signature has
taken up the "Krause method" of discourse. Yawn.

I will say one thing. Someday the whole truth will be known. However based on
the current evidence our treatment of the prisoners is wrong dead wrong. There
can be no possible reason IMO to treat them that way.

Right is right and wrong is wrong. There are no shades of gray here that I can
see. This action is not anything that I as an American can be proud of. What we
originally went in there to do I support and still do but those responsible for
this need to be brought to justice. I know that Harry will jump in here and
state that it is all Bush's fault. He has the right to state his opinion as do
I but turnabout is fair play. The Democrats are not without their own skeletons
in their closets either.

As stated someday the truth will be known.

On Sun, 09 May 2004 11:32:48 -0400, NOYB wrote:

The insurgents who were piled naked in a pile, or leashed like a dog while
lying naked on the floor, did not die. So how can you even compare those
acts to what the terrorists did to those civilian contractors in Fallujah?

It may be too early to be comparing. There are also allegations of rape
and murder. If those allegations are true, dead is dead.