Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "jps" wrote in message ... In article .net, says... "jps" wrote in message ... In article et, says... How about we talk about the al Qaeda terrorist who was caught trying to detonate a chemical bomb in Jordan recently? ABC World News Now. April 27, 2004 In an interview broadcast by ABC's World News Now, the leader of the Al Qaeda cell organizing the explosive and chemical attack on the Jordanian security headquarters and the American Embassy in Jordan stated that he received his training from Al-Zawahiri in Iraq, prior to the fall of Afghanistan. Not WMDs, fertilizer bombs. Ingredients available in large quantities worldwide. The same variety that took 160 innocent men, women and children's lives in Oklahoma City by one of our own. Way to skip over the important point: al Qaeda was using Iraq as a safe-haven while plotting the attack...long before we even went into Iraq. Well Jeez, Saudi Arabia was a safe haven and provided funding for al Qaeda long before we went to Iraq. Further, 15 or the 19 hijackers who conspired to kill 3000 of our brethren were Saudi nationals. Why didn't we invade their country? Because our economy couldn't handle the economic shock of the lost oil supply. Of course, Iraq provides not only the staging area to strike against the other countries in the region...but also enough oil to keep our economy going should bin Laden successfully oust the Saudi royals. There's plenty of evidence of terrorist activity in Saudi Arabia right now! Should we invade there next or should it be Iran? Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from the rest of the Middle East. Would you like to send your children? Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net... Should we invade there next or should it be Iran? Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from the rest of the Middle East. Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to describe how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some fresh air..... Would you like to send your children? Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old enough to be drafted. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Kanter wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Should we invade there next or should it be Iran? Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from the rest of the Middle East. Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to describe how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some fresh air..... Would you like to send your children? Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old enough to be drafted. Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains lives. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Should we invade there next or should it be Iran? Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from the rest of the Middle East. Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to describe how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some fresh air..... Would you like to send your children? Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old enough to be drafted. Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains lives. Harry, You've been wishing a terrorist strike down here for awhile. As much as you and I disagree, I'd never wish that on you nor any another American. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NYOB,
That is because you are a compassionate individual. Harry on the other hand, is an insecure old fart who is insecure and wishes ill will on all who disagree with him. "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Should we invade there next or should it be Iran? Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from the rest of the Middle East. Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to describe how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some fresh air..... Would you like to send your children? Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old enough to be drafted. Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains lives. Harry, You've been wishing a terrorist strike down here for awhile. As much as you and I disagree, I'd never wish that on you nor any another American. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message thlink.net... Should we invade there next or should it be Iran? Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from the rest of the Middle East. Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to describe how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some fresh air..... Would you like to send your children? Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old enough to be drafted. Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains lives. Harry, You've been wishing a terrorist strike down here for awhile. As much as you and I disagree, I'd never wish that on you nor any another American. You need some instruction in language. I'm not wishing anything. I feel in my gut we are going to be attacked again by terrorists, and *if* it does, I think it should be in "Bush Country," rather than in the more civilized parts of the nation. Let the Bush supporters feel the pain next time, eh? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message thlink.net... Should we invade there next or should it be Iran? Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from the rest of the Middle East. Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to describe how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some fresh air..... Would you like to send your children? Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old enough to be drafted. Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains lives. Harry, You've been wishing a terrorist strike down here for awhile. As much as you and I disagree, I'd never wish that on you nor any another American. You need some instruction in language. I'm not wishing anything. I feel in my gut we are going to be attacked again by terrorists, and *if* it does, I think it should be in "Bush Country," rather than in the more civilized parts of the nation. "More civilized parts"? LOL. You're a piece of work... |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
... Doug Kanter wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... Should we invade there next or should it be Iran? Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from the rest of the Middle East. Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to describe how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some fresh air..... Would you like to send your children? Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13 years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes. I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old enough to be drafted. Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains lives. I hope not. Too many innocent alligators and pelicans. I love pelicans. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Found it! Political test website | General | |||
Tucson men's boat found adrift in gulf | General | |||
OT--WMD's finally found... | General |