Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... November 1st, 2004. Gaaaaaar-on-teed. So you agree with the high-ranking official's assessment that "we may yet find them"? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... November 1st, 2004. Gaaaaaar-on-teed. So you agree with the high-ranking official's assessment that "we may yet find them"? At 5:00 today, I'm going fishing. There's a creek running through my office park. There's some sort of insect hatch going on right now. Therefore, it appears I may have a hatch to match on a different creek, the one I'll be fishing on. The official said "it appears.....we may yet find them". The content of my fishing prediction is pure fluff. The content of the official's statement is pure fluff. You know that. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 15:39:36 +0000, NOYB wrote:
So you agree with the high-ranking official's assessment that "we may yet find them"? I would agree that finding WMD is rapidly becoming irrelevant. If this administration was to be right about anything, I would have preferred it to be right about the Iraqis welcoming us with flowers and dancing in the streets. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Found it! Political test website | General | |||
Tucson men's boat found adrift in gulf | General | |||
OT--WMD's finally found... | General |