In article et,
says...
To quote a high-ranking government official quoted on 4/27/04:

"It appears, as they peel away the weapons of mass destruction issue - and
we may yet find them...Look, I want to make it clear. Who knows if a month
from now, three months from now, you find some weapons? You may."

Wow, big news. You neocons love vagaries. How about let's talk about
10 more of our kids got killed today in Bush's quagmire?

Let's relive another quote.

Donny "Slick" Rumsfeld's assertion before the war that they "knew where
the WMDs were, around Tikrit" and elsewhere.

Bullpucky.

How about we talk about the al Qaeda terrorist who was caught trying to
detonate a chemical bomb in Jordan recently?

ABC World News Now. April 27, 2004

In an interview broadcast by ABC's World News Now, the leader of the Al
Qaeda cell organizing the explosive and chemical attack on the Jordanian
security headquarters and the American Embassy in Jordan stated that he
received his training from Al-Zawahiri in Iraq, prior to the fall of
Afghanistan.

--------------------------------------------------

The War on Terrorism and the War in Iraq are one and the same.

In article et,
says...
How about we talk about the al Qaeda terrorist who was caught trying to
detonate a chemical bomb in Jordan recently?

ABC World News Now. April 27, 2004

In an interview broadcast by ABC's World News Now, the leader of the Al
Qaeda cell organizing the explosive and chemical attack on the Jordanian
security headquarters and the American Embassy in Jordan stated that he
received his training from Al-Zawahiri in Iraq, prior to the fall of
Afghanistan.

Not WMDs, fertilizer bombs. Ingredients available in large quantities
worldwide. The same variety that took 160 innocent men, women and
children's lives in Oklahoma City by one of our own.

jps

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article et,
says...
How about we talk about the al Qaeda terrorist who was caught trying to
detonate a chemical bomb in Jordan recently?

ABC World News Now. April 27, 2004

In an interview broadcast by ABC's World News Now, the leader of the Al
Qaeda cell organizing the explosive and chemical attack on the Jordanian
security headquarters and the American Embassy in Jordan stated that he
received his training from Al-Zawahiri in Iraq, prior to the fall of
Afghanistan.

Not WMDs, fertilizer bombs. Ingredients available in large quantities
worldwide. The same variety that took 160 innocent men, women and
children's lives in Oklahoma City by one of our own.

jps

We have yet to bomb that damned state.

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article et,
says...
How about we talk about the al Qaeda terrorist who was caught trying to
detonate a chemical bomb in Jordan recently?

ABC World News Now. April 27, 2004

In an interview broadcast by ABC's World News Now, the leader of the Al
Qaeda cell organizing the explosive and chemical attack on the Jordanian
security headquarters and the American Embassy in Jordan stated that he
received his training from Al-Zawahiri in Iraq, prior to the fall of
Afghanistan.

Not WMDs, fertilizer bombs. Ingredients available in large quantities
worldwide. The same variety that took 160 innocent men, women and
children's lives in Oklahoma City by one of our own.


Way to skip over the important point: al Qaeda was using Iraq as a
safe-haven while plotting the attack...long before we even went into Iraq.

Currently, members of Saddam's "Special Operations and Antiterrorism Branch"
are working in conjuncton with al Zarqawi's al Qaeda unit to coordinate
attacks against U.S. forces.

I don't know what it will take to convince you that al Qaeda and Iraq had
been working together for years.

"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article et,
says...
How about we talk about the al Qaeda terrorist who was caught trying
to
detonate a chemical bomb in Jordan recently?

ABC World News Now. April 27, 2004

In an interview broadcast by ABC's World News Now, the leader of the
Al
Qaeda cell organizing the explosive and chemical attack on the
Jordanian
security headquarters and the American Embassy in Jordan stated that
he
received his training from Al-Zawahiri in Iraq, prior to the fall of
Afghanistan.

Not WMDs, fertilizer bombs. Ingredients available in large quantities
worldwide. The same variety that took 160 innocent men, women and
children's lives in Oklahoma City by one of our own.


Way to skip over the important point: al Qaeda was using Iraq as a
safe-haven while plotting the attack...long before we even went into Iraq.

Currently, members of Saddam's "Special Operations and Antiterrorism
Branch"
are working in conjuncton with al Zarqawi's al Qaeda unit to coordinate
attacks against U.S. forces.

I don't know what it will take to convince you that al Qaeda and Iraq had
been working together for years.

Evidence, not just claims.

In article .net,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article et,
says...
How about we talk about the al Qaeda terrorist who was caught trying to
detonate a chemical bomb in Jordan recently?

ABC World News Now. April 27, 2004

In an interview broadcast by ABC's World News Now, the leader of the Al
Qaeda cell organizing the explosive and chemical attack on the Jordanian
security headquarters and the American Embassy in Jordan stated that he
received his training from Al-Zawahiri in Iraq, prior to the fall of
Afghanistan.

Not WMDs, fertilizer bombs. Ingredients available in large quantities
worldwide. The same variety that took 160 innocent men, women and
children's lives in Oklahoma City by one of our own.


Way to skip over the important point: al Qaeda was using Iraq as a
safe-haven while plotting the attack...long before we even went into Iraq.

Well Jeez, Saudi Arabia was a safe haven and provided funding for al
Qaeda long before we went to Iraq. Further, 15 or the 19 hijackers who
conspired to kill 3000 of our brethren were Saudi nationals. Why didn't
we invade their country?

There's plenty of evidence of terrorist activity in Saudi Arabia right
now!

Should we invade there next or should it be Iran? Would you like to
send your children?

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article .net,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article et,
says...
How about we talk about the al Qaeda terrorist who was caught trying
to
detonate a chemical bomb in Jordan recently?

ABC World News Now. April 27, 2004

In an interview broadcast by ABC's World News Now, the leader of the
Al
Qaeda cell organizing the explosive and chemical attack on the
Jordanian
security headquarters and the American Embassy in Jordan stated that
he
received his training from Al-Zawahiri in Iraq, prior to the fall of
Afghanistan.

Not WMDs, fertilizer bombs. Ingredients available in large quantities
worldwide. The same variety that took 160 innocent men, women and
children's lives in Oklahoma City by one of our own.


Way to skip over the important point: al Qaeda was using Iraq as a
safe-haven while plotting the attack...long before we even went into
Iraq.

Well Jeez, Saudi Arabia was a safe haven and provided funding for al
Qaeda long before we went to Iraq. Further, 15 or the 19 hijackers who
conspired to kill 3000 of our brethren were Saudi nationals. Why didn't
we invade their country?

Because our economy couldn't handle the economic shock of the lost oil
supply. Of course, Iraq provides not only the staging area to strike
against the other countries in the region...but also enough oil to keep our
economy going should bin Laden successfully oust the Saudi royals.



There's plenty of evidence of terrorist activity in Saudi Arabia right
now!



Should we invade there next or should it be Iran?

Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not be
a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from the
rest of the Middle East.

Would you like to
send your children?

Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1 years
old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13
years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes.

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

Should we invade there next or should it be Iran?

Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not
be
a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from
the
rest of the Middle East.

Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to describe
how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy
action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some
fresh air.....


Would you like to
send your children?

Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1
years
old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13
years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes.



I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our
current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old enough
to be drafted.

NOYB wrote:
(snip)
Way to skip over the important point: al Qaeda was using Iraq as a
safe-haven while plotting the attack...long before we even went into
Iraq.

When are the trials going to begin to prove this point?


Well Jeez, Saudi Arabia was a safe haven and provided funding for al
Qaeda long before we went to Iraq. Further, 15 or the 19 hijackers who
conspired to kill 3000 of our brethren were Saudi nationals. Why didn't
we invade their country?

Because our economy couldn't handle the economic shock of the lost oil
supply. Of course, Iraq provides not only the staging area to strike
against the other countries in the region...but also enough oil to keep
our economy going should bin Laden successfully oust the Saudi royals.

You admit this was all about oil now.

Maybe we should look to become more Hi-Tech in order to free us from a
limited supply of a resource and stop exporting technology abroad along
with jobs. Nobody needs the damn oil if they can't afford it.




There's plenty of evidence of terrorist activity in Saudi Arabia right
now!

Isn't that who we were looking for? Tell them to bring them to us in
handcuffs or else. NOW!!!!




Should we invade there next or should it be Iran?

Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not
be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them
from the rest of the Middle East.

Is this the way you see the "plan".


Would you like to
send your children?

Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1
years
old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13
years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes.

There are countries with nukes now that were building rockets (fireworks)
before the Europeans knew what gun powder is.
They never have liked us very much either.
Will your kids want to defend us against them when we've been bankrupted
like Russia was.

I don't see your profession as being so secure, that enough "health care
professionals" couldn't be trained to take over many responsibilities, that
you are charged with now. That's what you hear from this administration.
Retrain the unemployed. Why not?

Then the attention may fall on the brotherhood of orginizations that you
belong to, and be seen as a group that inflates health care costs that
needs to be stopped. Can you say, Union Busters.

I have no idea what the "plan" is. I'm not sure there is one.
There is no need to reply, I just don't see, what you see.
--
__________m___~¿Ô___m____________________________