OT--WMD's may still be found
 

Doug Kanter wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


Should we invade there next or should it be Iran?

Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not

be

a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from

the

rest of the Middle East.


Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to describe
how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy
action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some
fresh air.....



Would you like to

send your children?

Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1

years

old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13
years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have nukes.




I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our
current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old enough
to be drafted.



Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains
lives.

OT--WMD's may still be found
 

"____m___~¿Ô___m____" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
(snip)
Way to skip over the important point: al Qaeda was using Iraq as a
safe-haven while plotting the attack...long before we even went into
Iraq.

When are the trials going to begin to prove this point?


Well Jeez, Saudi Arabia was a safe haven and provided funding for al
Qaeda long before we went to Iraq. Further, 15 or the 19 hijackers who
conspired to kill 3000 of our brethren were Saudi nationals. Why
didn't
we invade their country?

Because our economy couldn't handle the economic shock of the lost oil
supply. Of course, Iraq provides not only the staging area to strike
against the other countries in the region...but also enough oil to keep
our economy going should bin Laden successfully oust the Saudi royals.

You admit this was all about oil now.

I've admitted all along that oil has always been a key factor. bin Laden
wants us out of the Middle East so he can replace the Saudi and Jordanian
leadership with radical Islamics. Once that is accomplished, he will have
Israel surrounded, and he can control the oil in the region, thus destroying
us economically.

Why do you think so many al Qaeda terrorists are flooding into Iraq? Having
US troops in Iraq screws up his entire plan!


Maybe we should look to become more Hi-Tech in order to free us from a
limited supply of a resource and stop exporting technology abroad along
with jobs.

I agree...but it doesn't happen overnight.

Nobody needs the damn oil if they can't afford it.

Being able to afford it has nothing to do with whether or not you need it.

There's plenty of evidence of terrorist activity in Saudi Arabia right
now!

Isn't that who we were looking for? Tell them to bring them to us in
handcuffs or else. NOW!!!!







Should we invade there next or should it be Iran?

Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not
be a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them
from the rest of the Middle East.

Is this the way you see the "plan".

It's the way I see it, yes. It also appears to be the way the plan is being
implemented by the White House.



Would you like to
send your children?

Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1
years
old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13
years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have
nukes.

There are countries with nukes now that were building rockets (fireworks)
before the Europeans knew what gun powder is.
They never have liked us very much either.

They're a known enemy who knows that an attack against the US with nukes
would mean Mutually Assured Destruction. The radical Islamic countries
think that they can give WMD's to terrorist groups who can sneak them into
Israel or the US without us tracing them back to the country of origin. Of
course, they got this stupid idea from watching how the Clinton
Administration handled terrorist cases (ie--as a law enforcement issue).


Will your kids want to defend us against them when we've been bankrupted
like Russia was.

We won't be bankrupted unless bin Laden controls the oil.


I don't see your profession as being so secure, that enough "health care
professionals" couldn't be trained to take over many responsibilities,
that
you are charged with now.

Dentistry requires 4 years of post-graduate training. The dental
specialities require an addition 2-4+ years. You really think people in
today's litigious society would allow a layman near their mouths with a high
speed bur running at 400,000 rpm? Or allow them to cut away bone from an
impacted wisdom tooth? Or do a root canal? You're dreaming.


That's what you hear from this administration.
Retrain the unemployed. Why not?

I just explained "why not".



Then the attention may fall on the brotherhood of orginizations that you
belong to, and be seen as a group that inflates health care costs that
needs to be stopped. Can you say, Union Busters.

Can you say "you'd need to overturn a State's constitutional amendment that
establishes a self-regulating Board of Dentistry"?


I have no idea what the "plan" is. I'm not sure there is one.
There is no need to reply, I just don't see, what you see.

Perhaps you're not trying hard enough.

OT--WMD's may still be found
 

"____m___~¿Ô___m____" wrote in message
.. .
NOYB wrote:


"____m___~¿Ô___m____" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:

To quote a high-ranking government official quoted on 4/27/04:

"It appears, as they peel away the weapons of mass destruction
issue -
and
we may yet find them...Look, I want to make it clear. Who knows if a
month
from now, three months from now, you find some weapons? You may."

That must have been the "high ranking government offical" who's hiding
them
at this very moment.

Hehehe. It was John Kerry on Hardball with Chris Matthews Tuesday
night.

Who is Chris Matthews?
What station?

You're kidding, right? He worked for several Presidential administrations,
and is one of the top news talk show hosts in the country...on MSNBC.

I missed it.
I didn't intend to plagiarize a quote.
I would gladly give recognition where due.

Oh well..........I must not be the only one with this thought then.

Huh?

OT--WMD's may still be found
 

great reply. Keep up the good work

"____m___~¿Ô___m____" wrote in message
. ..
John Smith wrote:

As he slowly trolls, all the fish come into view, fighting each other to
grab his lure.


"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
To quote a high-ranking government official quoted on 4/27/04:

"It appears, as they peel away the weapons of mass destruction issue -
and we may yet find them...Look, I want to make it clear. Who knows if
a
month from now, three months from now, you find some weapons? You may."





If everthing that of any value, that a "top poster" wrote was put to
paper.
It could be folded up,,,, stuck up a fleas ass,,,, and it would roll
around
like a BB in a boxcar.
--
__________m___~¿Ô___m____________________________

OT--WMD's may still be found
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


Should we invade there next or should it be Iran?

Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not

be

a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from

the

rest of the Middle East.


Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to
describe
how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy
action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some
fresh air.....



Would you like to

send your children?

Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1

years

old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13
years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have
nukes.




I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our
current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old
enough
to be drafted.



Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains
lives.

Harry,
You've been wishing a terrorist strike down here for awhile. As much as you
and I disagree, I'd never wish that on you nor any another American.

OT--WMD's may still be found
 

"Joe" wrote in message ...
"jps" wrote in message
...

Not WMDs, fertilizer bombs. Ingredients available in large quantities
worldwide. The same variety that took 160 innocent men, women and
children's lives in Oklahoma City by one of our own.

jps

They were not "fertilizer bombs" as used in Oklahoma City.
There was nerve gas in the mix.

That is yet to be determined. The only positive identification of the
chemicals I have seen stated that a "large portion" of the mix was
just sulfuric acid, which seems to indicate that the attackers simply
wanted to contaminate the area with toxic chemicals.


An est. 80,000 people would have died, the vast majority from chemical
exposure.

That claim is ridiculous at face value. By comparison, the Bhopal
tragedy involved 40 tons of pure cyanide, an honest-to-god chemical
weapon, and only killed 20,000 people.

OT--WMD's may still be found
 

NYOB,
That is because you are a compassionate individual. Harry on the other
hand, is an insecure old fart who is insecure and wishes ill will on all who
disagree with him.


"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...


Should we invade there next or should it be Iran?

Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may
not

be

a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them
from

the

rest of the Middle East.


Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to
describe
how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those
sexy
action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get
some
fresh air.....



Would you like to

send your children?

Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1

years

old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in
13
years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have
nukes.




I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our
current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old
enough
to be drafted.



Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains
lives.

Harry,
You've been wishing a terrorist strike down here for awhile. As much as
you
and I disagree, I'd never wish that on you nor any another American.

OT--WMD's may still be found
 

NOYB wrote:


You're kidding, right? He worked for several Presidential
administrations, and is one of the top news talk show hosts in the
country.

Well, he never made a great impression on me.

..on MSNBC.

That's why I will keep missing him.
Of course I don't watch the cartoon network either.
I just don't get the humor on either one.
--
_______m___õ¿~___m_________________________
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take,
but by the moments that take our breath away".
--George Carlin--

OT--WMD's may still be found
 

NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Doug Kanter wrote:

"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...



Should we invade there next or should it be Iran?

Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may not

be


a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them from

the


rest of the Middle East.


Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to

describe

how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those sexy
action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get some
fresh air.....




Would you like to


send your children?

Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1

years


old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in 13
years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have

nukes.



I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our
current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old

enough

to be drafted.



Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains
lives.


Harry,
You've been wishing a terrorist strike down here for awhile. As much as you
and I disagree, I'd never wish that on you nor any another American.




You need some instruction in language. I'm not wishing anything. I feel
in my gut we are going to be attacked again by terrorists, and *if* it
does, I think it should be in "Bush Country," rather than in the more
civilized parts of the nation. Let the Bush supporters feel the pain
next time, eh?

OT--WMD's may still be found
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Doug Kanter wrote:

"NOYB" wrote in message
thlink.net...



Should we invade there next or should it be Iran?

Probably Iran, since they're closest to developing nukes. There may
not

be


a need to hit Saudi Arabia militarily if we're able to isolate them
from

the


rest of the Middle East.


Hit Saudi Arabia....pant...pant.....pant....I don't have words to

describe

how HOT HOT HOT you sound when you talk macho like that, with those
sexy
action verbs. Not unlike President "Bring 'Em On". I have to go get
some
fresh air.....




Would you like to


send your children?

Of course I wouldn't like it. However, my kids are 4 1/2, 2 1/2 and 1

years


old. I'd prefer we deal with the radical Islamics now rather than in
13
years when my oldest is draft age...*AND* those same countries have

nukes.



I have news for you, hot boy: If we keep dealing with the world in our
current fashion, we'll have the same problems when your kids are old

enough

to be drafted.



Perhaps the next target will be in SW Florida, where knobs-for-brains
lives.


Harry,
You've been wishing a terrorist strike down here for awhile. As much as
you
and I disagree, I'd never wish that on you nor any another American.




You need some instruction in language. I'm not wishing anything. I feel
in my gut we are going to be attacked again by terrorists, and *if* it
does, I think it should be in "Bush Country," rather than in the more
civilized parts of the nation.

"More civilized parts"? LOL. You're a piece of work...