![]() |
( OT ) In Search Of A Plan
John H wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:49:37 -0400, Harry Krause wrote: Don White wrote: Jim wrote in message ... : "About one in every 10 members of Iraq's security forces 'actually worked against' U.S. troops during the recent militia violence in Iraq, and an additional 40 percent walked off the job because of intimidation." This can't be! I remember all those army press releases John H. produced, saying how well things were going and making much of the graduating classes. What happened! Could the army pr people be wrong? John simply is playing the same lying, deceitful game the Pentagon played during its Vietnam fiasco. he hopes by spreading meaningless flackery, he can help obfuscate the disaster that has become Bush's policy in Iraq. It's just lying by another name. He probably got used to it during his days in the military. Speaking of good news. Luckily the defeatist attitude doesn't live in the US Marine Corps. Marines pin hopes on new Iraqi police Yet another example of stupidity. |
( OT ) In Search Of A Plan
|
( OT ) In Search Of A Plan
|
( OT ) In Search Of A Plan
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Harry are you talking about those bunch of scared kids who were surrounded by 1000's of anger protestor throwing rocks and bottles? Oh, Christ!!! Some things cannot be left unchallenged. Aplogies in advance to all: He's baaa-aack! |
( OT ) In Search Of A Plan
John Smith wrote:
Harry are you talking about those bunch of scared kids who were surrounded by 1000's of anger protestor throwing rocks and bottles? Whoa right there hoss. You are flat wrong. The protestors never "surrounded" anybody. ... Unfortunately a small group of the guardsmen feeling in danger of their life, freaked out and shot into the crowd trying to disperse the angry students. Actually, they shot at a crowd across a big lawn, and two of the people killed were not even in the protest. You should not be angry at the guardsmen, Yes, you should. They murdered their countrymen over a political disagreement. ... you should be upset at LBJ who sent young Americans to an war that we could never win. Agreed, but with the added notice that LBJ did not initiate US involvement in Viet Nam nor formulate an original policy. All he did was follow bad advice and indulge in a Southerner's instinct to not back down from a fight. Viet Nam was a disaster in the making back in the 1800s, and we should *never* have backed the French to go back in after WW2. DSK |
( OT ) In Search Of A Plan
I don't listen to Rush, Fox News, or Hannity. Below I have copied the order
of events from the Kent May 4 Center www.may4.org. A web site to remember those killed at Ohio State, so hopefully it will not happen again. I can't imagine many 18 - 21 yr old soldiers who would not be scared to death. If you saw pictures of the students yelling at the guardsmen and the guardsman faces you would agree they were very scared. A real man would realize that it was a terrible situation for all, the students and the guardsmen. Both of them were put in that position due to a failed attempt to wage a ill conceived war, that LBJ escalated. LBJ knew the war was totally out of control, and for that reason he refused to accept his parties nomination for presidency This is from May4.org web site May 2 On the morning of May 2, some KSU students assisted with the downtown cleanup. Rumors of radical activities were widespread, and KSU's ROTC building was believed to be the target of militant student actions that evening. During the Vietnam War, students on many college campuses opposed the presence of ROTC and often were successful in forcing the removal of ROTC from their campuses. A dusk-to-dawn curfew was imposed on the city of Kent, and students were restricted to the campus. At 5 p.m., shortly after assessing the situation, Mayor Satrom alerted the Ohio National Guard. KSU officials were unaware of this decision. Shortly after 8 p.m., about 300 people gathered on the Commons, where a few anti-war slogans were chanted and a few brief speeches given. An impromptu march began and participants headed toward the dormitories to gain strength. Large numbers of people joined the march. The now 2,000 marchers swarmed down the hill over looking the Commons, crossed the Commons. They then surrounded the ROTC building, an old wooden World War II barracks which was scheduled to be demolished. Windows were broken, and a few persons eventually set the building on fire. Plain-clothed police who were standing nearby mce who were standing nearby made no attempt to stop the students at this point. Firemen arrived on the scene but their action were abandoned because some of the crowd attacked the firemen and slashed their hoses. The blaze quickly died out.The firemen eventually regained control and the fire died out. The building was ignited again. This time, however, firemen arrived with massive police protection. Police surrounded the building and dispersed the students with tear gas. The firemen again got the tire under control. The crowd then moved to the front of the campus and were astonished to see units of the Ohio national Guard arriving on their campus. The students retreated to the Commons to find the ROTC building smoldering at both ends. Within minutes, the building was fully ablaze. The crowd then assembled on the wooded hillside beside the Commons and watched as the building burned. Many shouted anti-war and anti-ROTC slogans. In the first two weeks of May, thirty ROTC buildings would be burned nationwide. Armed with tear gas and drawn bayonets, the Guard pursued students, protesters and bystanders alike, into dormitories and other campus buildings. Some stones were thrown and at least one student was bayoneted. The question of who set the fire that destroyed ROTC building has never been satisfactorily answered by any investigative body. May 3 May 3rd was a relatively quiet day. By now, however, the campus was fully occupied by Ohio National Guard troops, and armored personnel carriers were stationed throughout the campus. Although some students and guardsmen fraternized, the feeling, for the most part, was one of mutual hostility. That morning, Ohio Governor James Rhodes, who was running for U.S. Senate, arrived in Kent and along with city officials, held a news conference. Rhodes, running on a "law and order" platform, attempted to use this opportunity to garner votes in the primary election, which was only two days away. In a highly inflammatory speech, Rhodes claimed that the demonstrations at Kent were the handiwork of a highly organized band of revolutionaries who were out to "destroy higher education in Ohio." These protesters, Rhodes declared, were "the worst type of people we harbor in America, worse than the brown shirts and the communist element...we will use whatever force necessary to drive them out of Kent!" Later that evening, a National Guard commander would tell his troops that Ohio law gave them the right to shoot if necessary. This merely served to heighten guardsmen's hostility toward students. Arity toward students. Around 8 p.m., a crowd gathered on the Commons near the Victory bell. As the group increased in size, Guard officials announced the immediate enforcement of a new curfew. The crowd refused to disperse. At 9 p.m., the Ohio Riot Act was read. Tear gas was fired from helicopters hovering overheard, and the Guard dispersed the crowd from the area. Students attempted to demonstrate that the curfew was unnecessary by peacefully marching toward the town, but were met by guardsmen. Students then staged a spontaneous sit-in at the intersection of East Main and Lincoln streets and demanded that mayor Saytrom and KSU President Robert White speak with them about the Guard's presence on campus. Assured that this demand would be met, the crowd agreed to move from the street onto the front lawn of the campus. The Guard then betrayed the students and announced that the curfew would go into effect immediately. Helicopters and tear gas were used to disperse the demonstrators. As the crowd attempted to escape, some were bayoneted and clubbed by the guardsmen. Students were again pursued and prodded back to their dormitories. Tear gas inundated the campus, and helicopters with searchlights hovered overheard all night. , May 4, 1970 At 11 a.m., about 200 students gathered on the Commons. Earlier that morning, state and local officials had met in Kent. Some officials had assumed that Gov. Rhodes had declared Martial law to be in effect * but he had not. In fact, martial law was not officially declared until May 5. Nevertheless, the National Guard resolved to disperse any assembly. As noon approached, the size of the crowd increased to 1,500. Some were merely spectators, while others had gathered specifically to protest the invasion of Cambodia and the continued presence of the National Guard on the campus. Upon orders of Ohio's Assistant Adjutant General Robert Canterbury, an army jeep was driven in front of the assembled students. The students were told by means of a bullhorn to disperse immediately. Students responded with jeers and chants. When the students refused to disperse, Gen. Canterbury ordered the guardsmen to disperse them. Approximately 116 men, equipped with loaded M-1 rifles and tear gas, formed a skirmish-line toward the students. Aware of the bayonet injuries of the previous evening, students immediately ran away from the attacking National Guardsmen. Retreating up Blanket Hill, some students lobbed tear some students lobbed tear gas canisters back at the advancing troops, and one straggler was attacked with clubs. The Guard, after clearing the Commons, marched over the crest of the hill, firing tear gas and scattering the students into a wider area. The Guard then continued marching down the hill and onto a practice football field. For approximately 10 minutes, the Guard stayed in this position. During this time, tear gas canisters were thrown back and forth from the Guard's position to a small group of students in the Prentice Hall parking at, about 100 yards away. Some students responded to the guardsmen's attack by throwing stones. Guardsmen also threw stones at the students. But because of the distance, most stones from both parties fell far short of their targets. The vast majority of students, however, were spectators on the veranda of Taylor Hall. While on the practice field, several members of Troop G which would within minutes fire the fatal volley, knee and aimed their weapons at the students in the parking lot. Gen. Canterbury concluded that the crowd had been dispersed and ordered the Guard to march back to the Commons area. Some members of Troop G then huddled briefly. After reassembling on the field, the guardsmen seemed to begin to retreat as they marched back up the hill retracing their previous steps. Members of Troop G, while advancing up the hill, continued to glance back to the parking at, where the mos parking at, where the most militant and vocal students were located. The students assumed the confrontation was over. Many students began to walk to their next classes. As the Guard reached the crest of the Blanket Hill, near the Pagoda of Taylor Hall, about a dozen members of Troop G simultaneously turned around 180 degrees, aimed and fired their weapons into the crowd in the Prentice Hall parking lot. The 1975 civil trials proved that there was a verbal command to fire. A total of 67 shots were fired in 13 seconds. Four students; Allison Krause, Jeffrey Miller, Sandra Scheuer and William Schroeder were killed. Nine students were wounded: Joseph Lewis, John Cleary, Thomas Grace, Robbie Stamps, Donald Scott MacKenzie, Alan Canfora, Douglas Wrentmore, James Russell and Dean Kahler. Of the wounded, one was permanently paralyzed and several were seriously maimed. All were full-time students. "Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Harry are you talking about those bunch of scared kids who were surrounded by 1000's of anger protestor throwing rocks and bottles? Oh, Christ!!! Some things cannot be left unchallenged. Aplogies in advance to all: No. Harry is not talking about a group of scared kids "surrounded by 1000's of anger (sic) protestors throwing rocks and bottles" Shut off the Limbaugh show and do some acutal research on Kent State. Think it might be signfiicant that not a *single* guardsman was injured? Those thousands of protestors with rocks and bottles must have all been lousy shots. If no t, thousands of peope throwing rocks would have simply killed off the entire squad on the spot. The shooters were initially separated from the crowd by the brow of a hill, and had to crest that hill in order to open fire. You must be very young. Here are a few incidents related to Kent State and its aftermath to help you begin your liberation from propanganda and set you upon your quest for truth. May 3 Ohio Governor James A. Rhodes personally appears on campus and promises to use "every force possible" to maintain order. Rhodes denounces the protesters as worse than brownshirts and vows to keep the Guard in Kent "until we get rid of them." May 4 Four students are killed and nine others are wounded when a contingent of Guardsmen suddenly opens fire during a noontime demonstration. July 23 Key portions of a secret Justice Department memo are disclosed by the Akron Beacon Journal. The memorandum describes the shootings as unnecessary and urges the Portage County Prosecutor to file criminal charges against six Guardsmen. October 4 The President's Commission on Campus Unrest concludes: "The actions of some students were violent and criminal and some others were dangerous, reckless, and irresponsible." The shootings are branded as "unnecessary, unwarranted, and inexcusable." October 16 The "special" state grand jury exonerates the Guardsmen, but indicts 25 individuals, mostly students, for a variety of offenses that occurred on campus before the shootings. Late October-November Demands for a federal grand jury mount after it is revealed that the "special" state grand jury ignored key evidence and that one of the "special" prosecutors told a newsman he felt the Guardsmen should have shot more students. Following year: The "special" state grand jury is even further discredited when Ohio officials dismiss charges against 20 of the 25 individuals indicted by the grand jury. Ohio prosecutors claimed they had insufficient evidence to convict any protesters. 1973: May 10 In a meeting with the student petitioners, K. William O'Connor, a high-level Justice Department official, admits that the Justice Department already has sufficient evidence to prosecute six Guardsmen. A bit of truth leaks out: August 3 Assistant Attorney General J. Stanley Pottinger announces that the Justice Department will officially conduct a new inquiry. Senator Birch Bayh follows Pottinger's announcement by releasing a letter he received from one of the Guard's company commanders. On the basis of that letter Bayh charges that armed FBI informant Terry Norman may have been "the fatal catalyst" for the tragedy. NOTE: That letter was from one of the Guard's own company commanders, not some left wing apologist. 1974: October 7-17 Attorneys for James A. Rhodes unsuccessfully try to block the release of Rhodes's deposition in the civil case until after the Ohio gubernatorial election. The deposition reveals that Rhodes's attorney, in a move reminiscent of the Watergate cover-up, offered into evidence an incomplete transcript of Rhodes's May 3, 1970, press conference. Among the remarks deleted was a comment by an official that the Guard would resort to shooting if necessary. Etc, etc, etc, Now, other than "Everybody knows" and/or "I heard on Fox News, Hannity, or Limbaugh" what facts can you cite that support your allegation that thousands of angry protestors surrounded the troops and pelted them with rocks and bottles? Those innocent kids exercising their First Amendment Rights don't deserve to have their memories villified, especially when there isn't a shred of evidence supporting the wild allegation. A real man would apologize for such a slanderous error. |
( OT ) In Search Of A Plan
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:gZXhc.5422$IW1.488827@attbi_s52... Harry are you talking about those bunch of scared kids who were surrounded by 1000's of anger protestor throwing rocks and bottles? Unfortunately a small group of the guardsmen feeling in danger of their life, freaked out and shot into the crowd trying to disperse the angry students. You should not be angry at the guardsmen, you should be upset at LBJ who sent young Americans to an war that we could never win. If LBJ had not escalated the war, the protestors would not have threaten the guardsmen, and the guardsmen would have been home with their family. You do seem to make a habit of placing the blame on the wrong people. Here we go again: Lights on, nobody home. Truman authorized the war in Vietnam. |
( OT ) In Search Of A Plan
"John H" wrote in message
... Has Hannity or Limbaugh discussed this recently? You must listen to them a lot more than I, Chuck, as I don't recall anything about this matter. Of course, I focus a lot more on Mr Colmes. :) John, I have to tell you something. Sit down. This is serious. Are you ready? Really ready? You are a corpse. |
( OT ) In Search Of A Plan
No apologies necessary. Harry needs all the help he can get now. His
credibility seems to have taken a big hit. John H I'm not standing up for Harry. He makes his own bed here, and enjoys the abuse. I'm protesting the vile, hateful, inaccurate misrepresentation of a tragic incident. Most National Guardsmen would have never shot into a crowd of protestors, but some did. Trying after all these years to characterize the tragedy as a case of the Guardsmen acting in self defense is pure BS. Hell, even the NIXON administration concluded the shootings were "inexcusable". Is Nixon suddenly too liberal for our politically conservative sect? |
( OT ) In Search Of A Plan
Doug,
Do you have a problem comprehending English? I said LBJ "escalated the war. As far as your other comment about Truman, Truman did provide financial assistance to the French and provided a few military advisors (35 in 1950) to help train the Vietnamese troops, but it was the French-Indochina War until May, 1954. Truman's presidency ended before the French had withdrawn from Vietnam. Please turn on the lights. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "John Smith" wrote in message news:gZXhc.5422$IW1.488827@attbi_s52... Harry are you talking about those bunch of scared kids who were surrounded by 1000's of anger protestor throwing rocks and bottles? Unfortunately a small group of the guardsmen feeling in danger of their life, freaked out and shot into the crowd trying to disperse the angry students. You should not be angry at the guardsmen, you should be upset at LBJ who sent young Americans to an war that we could never win. If LBJ had not escalated the war, the protestors would not have threaten the guardsmen, and the guardsmen would have been home with their family. You do seem to make a habit of placing the blame on the wrong people. Here we go again: Lights on, nobody home. Truman authorized the war in Vietnam. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com