Bert Robbins wrote:

wrote in message
nk.net...

Leave it to a right-winger to get it all wrong.

This is the same Clinton that went through the impeachment process because
he knew in the end he would be found innocent. (As in not guilty, the
finding returned by the US Senate)


I think that you have it wrong. Clinton was found "guilty" of lying to a
Federal judge and that is called impeachment and is performed by the House
of Representatives. However, the Senate did not believe that the crime
Clinton committed warranted removal from office.

Try to spin Clinton's sexaul misdeeds, to put it very lightly, anyway you
want the evidence is there that he did the things he was accused of doing.


Sadly, at the moment, we cannot impeach Bush for his horrific lies to
the American people because the Republ-thugs control the House. I'd love
to see the jerk twist a bit in the wind when the details of the
Bush-Bandar meetings come out.