Bert Robbins wrote:

wrote in message
nk.net...

Leave it to a right-winger to get it all wrong.

This is the same Clinton that went through the impeachment process because
he knew in the end he would be found innocent. (As in not guilty, the
finding returned by the US Senate)


I think that you have it wrong. Clinton was found "guilty" of lying to a
Federal judge and that is called impeachment and is performed by the House
of Representatives. However, the Senate did not believe that the crime
Clinton committed warranted removal from office.

Try to spin Clinton's sexaul misdeeds, to put it very lightly, anyway you
want the evidence is there that he did the things he was accused of doing.


Sadly, at the moment, we cannot impeach Bush for his horrific lies to
the American people because the Republ-thugs control the House. I'd love
to see the jerk twist a bit in the wind when the details of the
Bush-Bandar meetings come out.

No,, Bush hasn't done anything unethical to justify impeachment process,
otherwise your opposition would be jamming impeachment into every newspapers
and news media. Clinton did.
Clinton was selfishly satisfying himself that caused his impeachment
problems, Bush is presently taking the long term meaning of peace for the
world in his daily doings. Not hiding around the house sneaking off with
students half his age, then lying about it.
So who can you really trust anyway? I do not see any hidden agendas behind
Bush's push to rid the world of terrorism. I mean in his shoes now, I
wouldn't give a **** what you say about me,,, if I can save millions of
lives because I have the power to. LOL,,, Wow,, I would do exactly what he
is doing and use all my powers to eradicate the world of these killers who
want to kill all Christians and Americans, and who already have been
successful in starting their objective, Bush would be thought of more of a
hero in 10 years time from now if this mission picks up and is successful.
If he listens to you people, he will go down in history as a president who
didn't react or no backbone, or did nothing to eradicate terrorism......
Why do you people want to leave terrorism alone anyway? Why are you not
supporting Bush's attack on terrorism? There is no excuse why your not, the
world should be in the coalition forces.
Hey,,, I am not an American but am a Christian,,, I hope Bush gets to them
killers before they get to me.......... or anyone else for that matter,,,Why
you wouldn't one will never know,,,,,,,









"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:

wrote in message
nk.net...

Leave it to a right-winger to get it all wrong.

This is the same Clinton that went through the impeachment process
because
he knew in the end he would be found innocent. (As in not guilty, the
finding returned by the US Senate)


I think that you have it wrong. Clinton was found "guilty" of lying to a
Federal judge and that is called impeachment and is performed by the
House
of Representatives. However, the Senate did not believe that the crime
Clinton committed warranted removal from office.

Try to spin Clinton's sexaul misdeeds, to put it very lightly, anyway
you
want the evidence is there that he did the things he was accused of
doing.


Sadly, at the moment, we cannot impeach Bush for his horrific lies to
the American people because the Republ-thugs control the House. I'd love
to see the jerk twist a bit in the wind when the details of the
Bush-Bandar meetings come out.

Tuuk wrote:

No,, Bush hasn't done anything unethical to justify impeachment process,


How the hell would you know? You're five cans short of a six pack.