Clinton Told Bush That Bin Laden Top Security Threat
 

Tuuk wrote:

That the same Clinton that embarrassingly put America through impeachment
process? Same Clinton who abused his power and raped an intern?
Same Clinton who cheated on his wife every time he could?
The Same Clinton who smoked marijuana but never exhaled it??????

I thought I recognized your top posting style.

http://tinyurl.com/3enyg
Is this your secret on building WMD.
Do you hear noises when you shake your head?
Does it sound the same as when you shake that bottle of Milk of Magnesia?

Nah,,,never mind, I don't even care.
--
__________m___~¿Ô___m____________________________

Clinton Told Bush That Bin Laden Top Security Threat
 

No,, Bush hasn't done anything unethical to justify impeachment process,
otherwise your opposition would be jamming impeachment into every newspapers
and news media. Clinton did.
Clinton was selfishly satisfying himself that caused his impeachment
problems, Bush is presently taking the long term meaning of peace for the
world in his daily doings. Not hiding around the house sneaking off with
students half his age, then lying about it.
So who can you really trust anyway? I do not see any hidden agendas behind
Bush's push to rid the world of terrorism. I mean in his shoes now, I
wouldn't give a **** what you say about me,,, if I can save millions of
lives because I have the power to. LOL,,, Wow,, I would do exactly what he
is doing and use all my powers to eradicate the world of these killers who
want to kill all Christians and Americans, and who already have been
successful in starting their objective, Bush would be thought of more of a
hero in 10 years time from now if this mission picks up and is successful.
If he listens to you people, he will go down in history as a president who
didn't react or no backbone, or did nothing to eradicate terrorism......
Why do you people want to leave terrorism alone anyway? Why are you not
supporting Bush's attack on terrorism? There is no excuse why your not, the
world should be in the coalition forces.
Hey,,, I am not an American but am a Christian,,, I hope Bush gets to them
killers before they get to me.......... or anyone else for that matter,,,Why
you wouldn't one will never know,,,,,,,









"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:

wrote in message
nk.net...

Leave it to a right-winger to get it all wrong.

This is the same Clinton that went through the impeachment process
because
he knew in the end he would be found innocent. (As in not guilty, the
finding returned by the US Senate)


I think that you have it wrong. Clinton was found "guilty" of lying to a
Federal judge and that is called impeachment and is performed by the
House
of Representatives. However, the Senate did not believe that the crime
Clinton committed warranted removal from office.

Try to spin Clinton's sexaul misdeeds, to put it very lightly, anyway
you
want the evidence is there that he did the things he was accused of
doing.


Sadly, at the moment, we cannot impeach Bush for his horrific lies to
the American people because the Republ-thugs control the House. I'd love
to see the jerk twist a bit in the wind when the details of the
Bush-Bandar meetings come out.

Clinton Told Bush That Bin Laden Top Security Threat
 

Tuuk wrote:

No,, Bush hasn't done anything unethical to justify impeachment process,


How the hell would you know? You're five cans short of a six pack.

Clinton Told Bush That Bin Laden Top Security Threat
 

No Bert, you have it wrong.

Congress (the house of representatives) holds hearing to see if there are
grounds for impeachment. If they feel there is, they draw up Articles of
Impeachment which are then forwarded to the Senate for an impeachment trial.

Bill Clinton was charged, and found innocent in trial.

It grieves me to think all these people will talk the talk, but I can prove
them wrong in less than 3 minutes.

http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa091898.htm
The Impeachment Process
In the House of Representatives:

1.. The House Judiciary Committee decides whether or not to proceed with
impeachment. If they do...
2.. The Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Rep. Henry Hyde (R-Il) will
propose a Resolution calling for the Judiciary Committee to begin a formal
inquiry into the issue of impeachment.
3.. Based on their inquiry, the Judiciary Committee will send another
Resolution to the full House stating that impeachment is warranted and why
(the Articles of Impeachment), or that impeachment is not called for.
4.. The Full House (probably operating under special floor rules set by
the Rules Committee) will debate and vote on each Article of Impeachment.
5.. Should any one of the Articles of Impeachment be approved by a simple
majority vote, the President will be "impeached." However, being impeached
is sort of like being indicted of a crime. There still has to be a trial,
which is where the US Senate comes in.
In the Senate:

1.. The Articles of Impeachment are received from the House.
2.. The Senate formulates rules and procedures for holding a trial.
3.. A trial will be held. The President will be represented by his
lawyers. A select group of House members will serve as "prosecutors." The
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court will preside with all 100 Senators acting
as the jury.
4.. The Senate will meet in private session to debate a verdict.
5.. The Senate, in open session, will vote on a verdict. A 2/3 vote of the
Senate will result in a conviction.
6.. The Senate will vote to remove the President from office.
7.. The Senate may also vote (by a simple majority) to prohibit the
President from holding any public office in the future.
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
nk.net...
Leave it to a right-winger to get it all wrong.

This is the same Clinton that went through the impeachment process
because
he knew in the end he would be found innocent. (As in not guilty, the
finding returned by the US Senate)

I think that you have it wrong. Clinton was found "guilty" of lying to a
Federal judge and that is called impeachment and is performed by the House
of Representatives. However, the Senate did not believe that the crime
Clinton committed warranted removal from office.

Try to spin Clinton's sexaul misdeeds, to put it very lightly, anyway you
want the evidence is there that he did the things he was accused of doing.